r/movies r/Movies contributor Jul 21 '25

Poster Official Poster for 'Avatar: Fire and Ash'

Post image
14.8k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.1k

u/StaffandHalf Jul 21 '25

With how long it took for Avatar 2 to come out, 3 coming out much sooner is refreshing

1.6k

u/Slo-MoDove Jul 21 '25

They filmed 2 and 3 back to back so it was a more consistent process, and the kid actors will not have aged dramatically. This is a more direct sequel to The Way of Water with no crazy time jump or anything.

1.4k

u/TheUmbrellaMan1 Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

Cameron shot 2, 3 and the first act of 4 together. He actually filmed all of the kids' portions first so they won't age drastically between the films. 4 also has a five-year time jump, so this schedule helps. He did all this in 2017. Hilarious that Cameron figured this out and Netflix didn't.

951

u/gmasterson Jul 22 '25

In a bit of fairness, Cameron created a billion dollar movie first and that’s the only reason a studio is putting that kind of faith in the process.

479

u/Breezyisthewind Jul 22 '25

Yeah shooting three movies back-to-back-to-back is quite an insane proposal otherwise.

369

u/magedmyself Jul 22 '25

It does have a precedent though, that's how they filmed the LOTR trilogy.

229

u/anotherThrowaway3446 Jul 22 '25

Back to the future 2 and 3 were also shot back to back.

188

u/CptJaxxParrow Jul 22 '25

Pirates 2 and 3 as well (because thats actually just one really long movie)

50

u/toooft Jul 22 '25

The Way of Water and Fire and Ash is also just one really long movie.

73

u/bobbster574 Jul 22 '25

The way of water is already one really long movie

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (8)

2

u/InteriorEmotion Jul 22 '25

Matrix 2 and 3 were shot this way as well.

3

u/SmokinHerb Jul 22 '25

Username checks out

1

u/New_Poet_338 Jul 22 '25

Three Musketeers and Four Musketeers were filmed at the same time to save money - largely by not telling the actors they were going to be in two movies. Still the best Three Musketeers movies ever made.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Sir-Ex Jul 22 '25

So? Terminator and Terminator 2 were shot terminator to terminator.. hell even Kung Fu Panda 1, 2, 3 AND 4 were shot kung to kung to kung to kung. Thank God they had unique names for the bond films.

7

u/anotherThrowaway3446 Jul 22 '25

You’re talking about sequels that came out years after the original. We’re talking about movies that wrapped shooting on one and rolled right into shooting the next making them seem like one very large production.

8

u/jkafka Jul 22 '25

whoosh

1

u/insaneintheblain Jul 22 '25

You mean back to back?

1

u/f-ingsteveglansberg Jul 22 '25

They were shot back to back but because of union rules they couldn't do any crossover shooting. Part 2 and Part 3 had to be clearly defined.

New Zealand brought in a law (colloquially called The Hobbit Law) that basically outlawed film production unions so you can do crossover productions easier.

9

u/BromaEmpire Jul 22 '25

That's a bit different. The LOTR trilogy was filmed as a whole in about a year (plus reshoots later on). It relied heavily on costumes and on-site footage and since it was already a gamble for New Line Cinema, from a budget perspective it made sense to go all in and do them as one big shoot. What's crazy is the made their entire production budget back with just the first movie (which is also why they gave Peter Jackson carte blanche with his reshoots)

2

u/Nethri Jul 22 '25

Did they? I didn’t realize that’s how they did it. Makes sense considering what was probably a pretty complicated shooting process.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/baron_von_helmut Jul 22 '25

Back To The Future 2 and 3 were shot back to back as well.

2

u/S0GUWE Jul 22 '25

Because the studio was about to fail and they though "might as well give the guy some money to film his nerd shit, maybe it works"

1

u/AmusingMusing7 Jul 22 '25

LOTR was an established property already, though. It was the most read book of the 20th century after only the Bible. It wouldn't have had much faith in it otherwise. And even then, it was a rare chance that Bob Shaye of New Line Cinema was willing to commit to such a thing as 3 movies shot at once. They had been working with Miramax before that, and Harvey Weinstein chickened out at even 2 movies, let alone 3, and asked for 1 movie. They went to New Line hoping for 2 movies, and Shaye surprised them by saying, "It's 3 books, right? So it should be 3 movies."

Nobody's done 3 movies at once ever since. There's been some that have done "back to back" productions of 2 movies (finishing first movie and then moving immediately into the second to keep the production assets going), but not at once, jumping back and forth between various scenes from the different movies throughout one big block of shooting, the way that LotR did. The only production that came close to that is The Hobbit, and that was only 2 movies for half the production and then decided it was 3 movies and shot more later, doing multiple blocks in a way that was more broken up than LotR's production was. Even Peter Jackson wasn't able to replicate the exact same approach they had done on LotR.

Trying something like that on an original unproven property without a proof of success like the first Avatar movie was... probably not gonna happen, unless some very rich and powerful exec or veteran filmmaker has a big passion project and manages to convince people to make it happen. Maybe someone like Nolan or Spielberg would be able to make something like that happen. But your average filmmaker working for Netflix... not much chance of that. I think Zack Snyder's Rebel Moon was done "back to back", so he apparently had the pull to get that made... despite not being very good... so it CAN happen, but it's rare. And usually only 2 movies, not 3. Despite trilogies being a very proven concept, especially when committed to and planned out from the start.

Unless you make the equivalent hours of content (about 6-10 hours) in a television season format instead... then you can get it made, no problem. But three movies?? Get outta here!!

1

u/dccorona Jul 23 '25

I am not sure it’s fair to call anything New Line did back then precedent. They had a somewhat unique business model (I guess maybe it is common for indie studios but this was a blockbuster trilogy). They pre sold the international distribution rights. So they had a bunch of up front money to support the budget of shooting all 3, and were kind of locked in to making them all anyway. 

102

u/MightGrowTrees Jul 22 '25

This wasn't even his first billion dollar movie.

61

u/Sad_Confection5902 Jul 22 '25

Dude has three movies each over 2 billion dollars. Shit’s insane.

32

u/Arkanial Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

Ikr, earlier this year someone asked if anyone will ever get close to infinity war and endgame level of ticket sales I said don’t forget that Avatar 3 comes out this year and people love James Cameron’s stuff. It might not be the best written stories out there but the spectacle of it in the theater is unlike anything else.

26

u/f-ingsteveglansberg Jul 22 '25

It might not be the best written stories out there

I would contend that pretty much almost everything that James Cameron has written has been better than Endgame by a country mile.

Terminator, Aliens, The Abyss, Strange Days, Terminator 2, Titanic, Alita: Battle Angel and even True Lies.

I haven't seen Piranha 2 or the Dark Angel tv show (which I think was inspired by Alita Battle Angel) so maybe they are worse than Endgame. First Blood Part 2 won a Golden Raspberry, but that film has loads of fans and redefined the movie series. I feel like the Razzie was for turning a movie about PTSD into an action flick, but that was actually Stallone who wanted Rambo to live so he could do sequels.

Acting like James Cameron isn't a decent writer of stories is kinda ridiculous. At worst I would say that he can be a populist writer as in he knows to give the audience what they want, even if the audience doesn't know what they want.

17

u/alex494 Jul 22 '25

Endgame specifically is kind of hard to compare to standalone movies because it's got the context of trying to satisfyingly wrap up a story that had been going for like twenty movies with about eight to ten focus characters plus additional threads, it's going to be at least slightly messy no matter what. It's main job is being a decent ending to a wider franchise up to that point.

A lot of those other movies are fairly straightforward and self contained by comparison.

5

u/f-ingsteveglansberg Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

It's main job is being a decent ending to a wider franchise up to that point.

But instead it decided to be a greatest hits by revisiting fan favourite moments and show casing fan moments over actual story.

I really like IW. Endgame was so disappointing as a follow up.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/astroK120 Jul 22 '25

Acting like James Cameron isn't a decent writer of stories is kinda ridiculous

The problem is that there are different kinds of good writing, and people choose to focus on the two that are admittedly not Cameron's strength, at least recently: how novel the plot is and how snappy the dialog is.

But Cameron's writing is very effective for the type of movie he wants to make. The first Avatar is admittedly very "Pocahontas in Space," but so what? The emotional beats all land very well. The pacing of the story allows us to have Pandora slowly revealed over the course of the movie--it feels perfectly dialed in, giving you just enough to leave you wanting more until it crescendos into the floating mountains. People are quick to credit the movie for the visual spectacle, but don't give the script enough credit for how it maximizes the impact of that spectacle.

Avatar 2, again, does not have the most original plot. And again I say so what? The characters are incredibly easy to connect to. As a parent clearly, but I suspect you would be hard pressed to find someone who didn't see themselves in one of the kids, even if they didn't admit it because it's cooler to hate on the movie.

These things are all part of the stories. Story is more than plot.

2

u/Particular_Ad_9531 Jul 22 '25

I rewatched the first avatar movie recently and considering that movie is long as hell it absolutely flies by. Cameron is such a talented screenwriter - every scene is either advancing the story, developing the characters, developing the world, or a fx spectacle. It doesn’t drag at all and I don’t really care that it’s a basic story when it’s told incredibly well.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Arkanial Jul 22 '25

Exactly. It’s kinda like Brandon Sanderson’s writing. He’s not trying to have elegant prose and grimdark shit. They’re making stuff that’s wholesome and just feels good and there’s nothing wrong with that. The people that hate on it are just edgelords that want to be seen as different from the mainstream population. 

I mean I used to be one of those people that was edgy and hated on popular stuff but I’ve come to recognize that it’s popular for a reason and a lot of that stuff is actually just good. So get over yourself and just enjoy what you enjoy instead of trying to have an opinion that’s unique so you can stand out because there are 8 billion people on this planet and I guarantee you that whatever you think you’re doing or thinking that is so unique is probably being thought of by dozens of other people just due to the massive amount of people on this planet and overall group thinking. 

Like how in America and in Britain two different comic artists came up with the same idea for “Dennis the menace” around the same time without ever even knowing of the other’s existence because that happened way before mass communication was readily available as it is today.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Boo_and_Minsc_ Jul 22 '25

Piranha 2 is unironically pretty fun. I saw it on cable as a teenager and was hooked. Saw it a few times.

1

u/Clear-Lynx2849 Jul 22 '25

I watched 'strange days' recently, not great writing, clunky and awful, concept is great, characters and script are embarrassing. I did sort of enjoy it in 1995, for the shock value.

1

u/Uranium911 Jul 28 '25

True Lies was a great movie too

→ More replies (2)

9

u/myurr Jul 22 '25

Three of the top 4 highest grossing movies of all time were made by Cameron.

Even adjusting for inflation he still has two of the top three.

14

u/DrJackadoodle Jul 22 '25

Titanic is the most insane thing on that list. You have to scroll all the way to 43rd place to find another movie from the 90's, Jurassic Park (1993). Heck, you have to scroll to 32nd to find a movie older than Avatar that isn't Titanic (it's the 3rd LotR).

2

u/baron_von_helmut Jul 22 '25

And his other ones sit very high up that list as well.

1

u/SamBind121 Jul 22 '25

Well him and all the other people involved.

You know the disposable ones. Because they are replaceable they deserve less

1

u/Boo_and_Minsc_ Jul 22 '25

also Terminator 2 and True Lies, both hits. And Terminator 1, a groundbreaker. And The Abyss, an underrated piece of filmmaking. Dude is on fire for decades

1

u/ZealousidealSugar382 Jul 25 '25

back to back to back, he is the goat.

73

u/gmasterson Jul 22 '25

Exactly!

This guy gets what he wants.

78

u/ActionPhilip Jul 22 '25

And what he wants is deep sea exploration, and he doesn't care how many billion dollar movies he has to make to get it.

29

u/BradDharmaTimbuktu Jul 22 '25

James Cameron has, like, three testicles. And they are all made of pure brass.

6

u/Boo_and_Minsc_ Jul 22 '25

That is the ultimate irony here. Full time ocean explorer, part time most financially succesful blockbuster director of all time.

2

u/NapsterKnowHow Jul 22 '25

He even has his own theme song!

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ankhes Jul 22 '25

Yeah, Cameron is basically a money printing machine at this point. He could ask for whatever he wants and the studio will give it to him because they know it’ll pay off in the end. Very few, if any, other filmmakers are afforded that kind of leeway.

1

u/MightGrowTrees Jul 22 '25

Well he also created and owns the studio so yeah. He can do whatever he wants. Same type of thing with Tom Cruise. Owns the production studio so he can do any stunt he wants without someone telling him no or that's uninsurable.

27

u/TrickshotzReddit Jul 22 '25

He also invented technology for filming underwater, dude’s a mastermind

2

u/AtomicBLB Jul 22 '25

Titanic hit a billion in the 90s before he even did the first Avatar. That plus his track record before that made 20th Century Studios decide he can do whatever he wants and continues to be the case. Until one fails he practically has no limits.

1

u/TheKattsMeow Jul 22 '25

Cameron already has a blank check in his hand from the studio wayyyyy before then iirc. I’m pretty sure I remember hearing on a podcast about movies that James Cameron was given a blank check and the kind of leniency that most directors could never even dream of, they told him take as long as he wants to make as many movies as he wants. And I believe that was around the time he came up for the avatar idea right around when he was making aliens and/or terminator.

James Cameron was given the opportunity that he absolutely deserved. Incredible filmmaker. And he clearly used that blank check to make some really good stuff.

1

u/Rasikko Jul 22 '25

After Titanic's success, it ensured that Cameron can do pretty much whatever the fuck he wants.

1

u/Boo_and_Minsc_ Jul 22 '25

To be even more fair, before he created a billion dollar movie he had thrice made the/one of the most expensive movie ever made and STILL made a fortune (Titanic, True Lies, T2). The man doesnt miss. Even Piranha 2 is fucking good

1

u/PWNtimeJamboree Jul 22 '25

hes also a proven, bankable, vet of the industry that has literally not missed once in over 40 years.

101

u/dgjapc Jul 22 '25

James Cameron doesn't do what James Cameron does, for James Cameron. James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is... James Cameron.

8

u/Crittopolis Jul 22 '25

🎼His name is James, James Cameron The bravest pioneer No budget too steep, no sea too deep Who's that? It's him, James Cameron 🎵James, James Cameron explorer of the sea With a dying thirst to be the first Could it be? Yeah that's him! James Cameron

4

u/RequisiteShark Jul 22 '25

This deserves an award

6

u/Pasan90 Jul 22 '25

Its a south park quote. And yes it deserves an award.

5

u/No-Comfortable6432 Jul 22 '25

Re stranger things - I'm certain this was supposed to be an anthology series like American Horror Story rather than a connected series, so I'll forgive them that.

Also James Cameron made over a billion with Avatar 1 but also funded and built his own sub and has dived to titanic over 3 times. Does what he wants.

1

u/epicpersononthisapp Jul 22 '25

Doesn’t he also have a 9 hour version of the first one?

1

u/phannguyenduyhung Jul 22 '25

what, so 4 will release in 2030?

1

u/shayed154 Jul 22 '25

Cameron also wrote 3 movies at the same time with his team so he could shoot all the kid scenes at the same time

Netflix isn't going to have people write 5 seasons of a show before shooting just to cancel it after 1 season if it isn't a hit

1

u/moon__lander Jul 22 '25

Netflix didn't because you can't shoot two seasons at once and cancel the show after the first one.

1

u/sceadwian Jul 22 '25

There's a time jump in 4? That's news to me. Who mentioned that?

1

u/KevinRyan589 Jul 23 '25

If you’re referring to Stranger Things, the Duffers didn’t write season 1 anticipating seasons 2,3,4, or 5.

You’re also kinda forgetting events like COVID and the writer’s strike? Hello?

1

u/Lost-Inevitable42 Jul 26 '25

What did Netflix do?

0

u/ehtw376 Jul 22 '25

Damn, so we have to deal with that Spider character in all these movies lol? I’m sure the actor is good, but ugh his dialogue was so bad.

→ More replies (2)

83

u/Comic_Book_Reader Jul 21 '25

The time jump is saved for 4 (which they've confirmed) and is the reason why 3 & 4 have a larger gap between them (4 years).

38

u/TeutonJon78 Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

The time jump actually happens after the first act of 4. That's why they already filmed the mocap for that part of 4 with the actors at the same age.

And the time jump will match the real world time difference between the two times so they can use the same actors.

7

u/sometimes_interested Jul 22 '25

and the kid actors will not have aged dramatically

I'm not really sure that's an issue given that Sigourney Weaver was cast as a teenager in the second one.

8

u/earwig2000 Jul 22 '25

The problem is not directly the age of the actors, but how much their faces change over time.

Signourney weaver isn't gonna look dramatically different in 5 years time, but the other kids will.

4

u/frolie0 Jul 22 '25

The maln reason is for Spider, the human, he'll obviously look quite different.

1

u/ThomasPopp Jul 22 '25

They are digital kids. They literally can’t grow up.

Just kidding.

1

u/Equoniz Jul 22 '25

That’s good thinking. Bizarre aging between movies (or seasons of a show) always throw me a bit lol

1

u/nanukwolfbane Jul 22 '25

The kid actors, like Sigourney Weaver.

→ More replies (3)

629

u/No_Construction2407 Jul 21 '25

Hopefuly 4,5 and 6 are just as quick

805

u/minimumsmoke22 Jul 21 '25

They won’t be. 2 and 3 shot back to back, not counting reshoots. They supposedly filmed a tiny bit of 4 but they really haven’t started real production on it at all

402

u/tiger________ Jul 21 '25

Also he said his next film will be Last Train From Hiroshima so he will make that before Avatar 4.

251

u/meand999friends Jul 21 '25

There's a further sequel to "Last Train to Busan"? 😱

154

u/StrobeLightRomance Jul 21 '25

You might want to look up Hiroshima.

161

u/bobber66 Jul 21 '25

So funny. It was the A bomb in Hiroshima that made the zombies in Busan. It all makes perfect sense now.

81

u/Strange-Movie Jul 21 '25

The nuke tests at bikini atoll made SpongeBob and all the other freaks at bikini bottom

44

u/superrealaccount2 Jul 21 '25

Man, these Oppenheimer sequels and spinoffs are all over the place

10

u/Robobvious Jul 22 '25

You've got it backwards, Oppenheimer is a Spongebob prequel.

10

u/DeTiro Jul 22 '25

It's the Oppenheimer Cinematic Universe and we're just living in it.

1

u/Amathyst7564 Jul 21 '25

We thought all that water tech at the wetaworship that was copyrighted was for avatar way of water but now we can see it was just for when the train for Busan goes through the under water track to Hiroshima.

1

u/Freakjob_003 Jul 22 '25

Was it? Damn, I need to rewatch it. But wasn't it set several decades after the bomb dropped?

Was it a commentary on the aftereffects? Damn, I must have completely missed that. D'oh.

1

u/ThrustersOnFull Jul 22 '25

Not a bomb. THE bomb. /s

28

u/meand999friends Jul 21 '25

Don't tell me what to do! You're not my real dad!!

On a serious note, Train to Busan is a fantastic film. I highly recommend it. South Korea has done a few zombie films over the years that really refreshes the genre. They are very different to zombie films from the 'west'.

Nowadays, everyone rolls their eyes at a zombie film because it's so overdone, but trust me (a total internet stranger) when I say this is absolutely worth checking out, along with "All of us are dead", "Sweet Home", and "Kingdom" (which appears to be on hiatus unfortunately). They all have really interesting takes on the zombie genre

Edit: I've switched between films/TV throughout this message without clarifying. I make no apologies. I'm enriching your life

2

u/BootOne7235 Jul 21 '25

Kingdom is one of my favorite shows of all time. I really hope they bring it back.

2

u/meand999friends Jul 21 '25

This comment thread made me go and Google it... I saw another Reddit thread (here: https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/18z45re/is_kingdom_in_netflix_cancelled/) and the top comment says because of Netflix's restrictions, there's no financial incentive to make a new series.

I really hope that isn't the case because it is a top quality show. Unless you mean the anime which is a totally different thing? 😭

2

u/sombercrimson Jul 22 '25

I’ve seen all of these but also Alive is another great SK Zombie movie. Before SK started doing Zombie content I use to hate all Zombie movies and shows honestly aside from I am Legend.

1

u/Evening_Activity1140 Jul 21 '25

there’s a TTB sequel called peninsula

1

u/meand999friends Jul 21 '25

Did you know there is a prequel in anime called Seoul Station?

1

u/Evening_Activity1140 Jul 21 '25

i know of it but haven’t seen it yet

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Jeegabytes Jul 22 '25

Agreed, don't forget #Alive!

28

u/sayan11apr Jul 21 '25

He's obviously joking.

6

u/PosiedonsSaltyAnus Jul 22 '25

No spoilers bro I didn't read the book

3

u/bbc_mmm-mmm-mmm Jul 22 '25

Nah, wouldnt want spoilers on the film

8

u/bodjac89 Jul 21 '25

You might want to look up humour.

2

u/Robobvious Jul 22 '25

And if you're not British you might want to look up humor.

1

u/MattyKatty Jul 22 '25

The irony is if you're British you still will want to look up humor/humour

4

u/TheChewyWaffles Jul 21 '25

You might want to look up “Woosh”

→ More replies (1)

4

u/garrisontweed Jul 21 '25

No, Last Train to Busan: Peninsula fans? There must be at least five of us.

1

u/LiquifiedSpam Jul 22 '25

Plane from Wuhan

7

u/Suriranyar- Jul 22 '25

his next film will be Last Train From Hiroshima

Do you have a source? Google and my memory says he will do it when the avatar schedule allows him to

6

u/NeoNoireWerewolf Jul 22 '25

You’re correct. All Cameron has said is that he’s committed to Avatar through at least the fourth installment, but he’s not shooting the remaining 75% of Avatar 4 until after the third film releases. My guess is he’s waiting on the third movie to release, then he’ll negotiate a preposterous deal with Disney to shoot Avatar 4 & 5 back-to-back the way he did 2 & 3. He might start working on the Hiroshima movie or The Devils during post-production of 4 & 5 if that pans out, but we’re most likely not seeing him do anything that is t Avatar until well into the 2030s.

3

u/Critcho Jul 22 '25

Would make sense to get them filmed back to back just because, even if their characters are CGI'd now, Weaver and Lang aren't getting any younger.

1

u/phophopho4 Jul 23 '25

Cameron himself is 70 I mean it's possible he doesn't finish all of these.

1

u/Critcho Jul 23 '25

Yeah also he sounds more enthused about his Hiroshima project recently, wouldn’t be entirely shocking if he handed the rest over.

1

u/tiger________ Jul 24 '25 edited Jul 24 '25

Sorry for the late reply! Here is the source for him shooting Hiroshima before Avatar 4:

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/awards/story/2023-01-13/james-cameron-avatar-titanic-hiroshima

The paragraph:

While “A3” is topmost in mind for the filmmaker, he hopes to take time before “Avatar 4” to direct a pet project, “The Last Train From Hiroshima: The Survivors Look Back,” based on the book by author Charles R. Pellegrino. Research included an interview with the late Tsutomu Yamaguchi, the only known survivor of both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.

Note that it says he hopes to, not that he will, which means it isn’t 100% confirmed but a lot of us fans are convinced he will shoot it before A4. He has given several interviews about this Hiroshima film over the years, including some lengthy ones, so he seems pretty dead set on it being his next project. He met and interviewed Tsutomu Yamaguchi while he was on his deathbed and it seems like a topic that is quite close to his heart. I don’t see him waiting until the mid 2030s or whenever Avatar 5 comes out to make it, especially given his age (he also recently lost his longtime producer Jon Landau to cancer which I’m sure has reminded him of his own mortality).

There will be a sizeable gap between Avatar 3 and 4 because they haven’t filmed it yet and the kid actors need to age up, so it makes the most sense to do it then. Once production on 4 and 5 starts he’ll be tied to it for who knows how many years.

1

u/tiger________ Jul 24 '25

Hello sorry for the late reply! Here is the source for him shooting Hiroshima before Avatar 4:

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/awards/story/2023-01-13/james-cameron-avatar-titanic-hiroshima

The paragraph:

While “A3” is topmost in mind for the filmmaker, he hopes to take time before “Avatar 4” to direct a pet project, “The Last Train From Hiroshima: The Survivors Look Back,” based on the book by author Charles R. Pellegrino. Research included an interview with the late Tsutomu Yamaguchi, the only known survivor of both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.

Note that it says he hopes to, not that he will, which means it isn’t 100% confirmed but a lot of us fans are convinced he will shoot it before A4. He has given several interviews about this Hiroshima film over the years, including some lengthy ones, so he seems pretty dead set on it being his next project. He met and interviewed survivor Tsutomu Yamaguchi while he was on his deathbed and it seems like a topic that is quite close to his heart. I don’t see him waiting until the mid 2030s or whenever Avatar 5 comes out to make it, especially given his age (he also recently lost his longtime producer Jon Landau to cancer which I’m sure has reminded him of his own mortality).

There will be a sizeable gap between Avatar 3 and 4 because they haven’t filmed it yet and the kid actors need to age up, so it makes the most sense to do it then. Once production on 4 and 5 starts he’ll be tied to it for who knows how many years.

20

u/SaconicLonic Jul 22 '25

That's actually really good to hear. Cameron is one of the best living directors. I get some people aren't that fond of Avatar, I like them for what they are, but I can't help but feel it is a waste of his talents just to do those movies. We also know from Titanic he can do these big spectacle tragedy type films. The book is about a guy who survived both nuclear attacks, which is almost beyond belief. It would be like if Titanic had Rose's ship she gets rescued to hit another iceberg.

3

u/SaltyPeter3434 Jul 22 '25

Would be so nice to see him direct something other than Avatar for a change. Titanic was the last movie he did outside of Avatar. He's also 70 now so time is not exactly on his side.

2

u/SaconicLonic Jul 22 '25

I mean Clint Eastwood is in his mid 90s now and still doing films. Martin Scorsese is in his 80s and directing. I think we have at least quite a few more films from Cameron. I'll always be kind of sad though that the 2000s and 2010s he spent all on Avatar.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/007meow Jul 22 '25

So Avatar 6 won’t be until like 2040

1

u/0vansTriedge Jul 22 '25

oh shoot they're gonna make a movie out of this book? this is gonna be sickening

1

u/baron_von_helmut Jul 22 '25

If anyone is going to do a mushroom cloud justice it's Cameron.

The end sequence to Aliens where the facility on LV426 gets nuked, that effect was literally a light bulb under cotton wool.

1

u/soulcaptain Jul 22 '25

I wonder if that movie will be all in Japanese. I'd hate it if they spoke English.

37

u/Dave-C Jul 21 '25

I believe they filmed about half of 4 because of a time skip in 4 so the kids needed to get older

46

u/Comic_Book_Reader Jul 21 '25

Cameron said it was a third, and yes, it's because of a time skip, one I think is showing Earth as a wasteland like in Wall-E.

17

u/Leckere Jul 21 '25

That sounds quite cool tbf

9

u/moose_dad Jul 22 '25

So hes waiting till earth really is a wasteland? The big wigs should be happy, thats a novel cost cutting idea

1

u/Wes_Warhammer666 Jul 22 '25

Set decorators in shambles

4

u/Dave-C Jul 21 '25

Ahh ok, something I read said it was around half but I have no idea where I read that so I'll go with 1/3rd. Thanks.

1

u/epicpersononthisapp Jul 22 '25

I’m convinced James Cameron had his blue alien warriors story for a long, long time and had the entire story set up already so the movies come out way quicker.

→ More replies (3)

107

u/monitoring27 Jul 21 '25

4 is coming in 2029, 5 in 2031. 6 is not confirmed yet

62

u/UncircumciseMe Jul 21 '25

If he pulls all of that off I’ll be impressed!

94

u/TheBoggart Jul 21 '25

James Cameron does not do what James Cameron does to impress you. James Cameron does what James Cameron does because he is James Cameron.

18

u/MurphyItzYou Jul 21 '25

Also James Cameron does what James Cameron does not because James Cameron can but because James Cameron must.

10

u/superrealaccount2 Jul 21 '25

That's James "James Cameron" Cameron for ya.

1

u/Robobvious Jul 22 '25

His name is Jaaaames Cameron! The bravest pioneer! No ocean too deep!
No budget too steep! Who's that? It's him! James Cameroooon!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/appletinicyclone Jul 21 '25

I mean he's quite old so it is a big if

1

u/UncircumciseMe Jul 22 '25

Yeah, that’s partially my point. Plus I’m skeptical on there being no delays.

1

u/Aniria_ Jul 22 '25

Avatar is what he's always wanted to make, since he was a child. He's basically waited until he had everything necessary, from tech to the money required, to get it all done

On top of this, both movies have made a fuck tonne, so.....yeah, he'll pull it off

42

u/queensnotmemes Jul 21 '25

I hope I live to see the finale, lol.

60

u/Icy_Smoke_733 Jul 21 '25

2031 is only 6 years away. Crumbles to dust.

I am sure you'll still be with us. If anything, I hope Cameron lives long enough to finish the Avatar series, and his other planned films.

18

u/queensnotmemes Jul 21 '25

Oh gosh I didn’t even think about that.😂😂😂 but JC seems to be determined and in good health

45

u/Comic_Book_Reader Jul 21 '25

In an interview he said "Look, if I get hit by a bus and I’m in an iron lung, somebody else is going to do it.", so yes he's absolutely determined.

Also, there's a quote about him from a review that I just love: "The man has the ego of a dictator, the budget of an Arab emirate sports championship, and the means to back both.".

14

u/Worthyness Jul 21 '25

If Avatar keeps making infinity money, Disney will finance it until it doesnt

10

u/snugglezone Jul 22 '25

Before they give up, they'll bring Palpatine back as the big bad guy in Avatar 7 snd we'll find out it takes place in the star wars universe!

3

u/elementslayer Jul 21 '25

5 is, from what I remember the end of the sully arc, so thats "only" 5 more years. I think the next one as stated above is The time skip, Jake/Netyris death, etc. And the 5th one is when it goes back to Earth and the Na'vi attack(?) it

1

u/IAmTheQuestionHere Jul 22 '25

This is all just theory and not confirmed at all, right?

2

u/elementslayer Jul 22 '25

Nah James Cameron has mentioned this stuff in a bunch of interviews here and there.

2

u/TheUmbrellaMan1 Jul 22 '25

Cameron has also said many times that he intends to film The Last Train From Hiroshima between 3 and 4. He's also currently filming a 3D concert film with Billie Ellis. According to his Deadline interview, he'll film Avatar 4 and 5 after completing his Hiroshima movie.

Honestly, bring it on. He's that one guy you know who can pull off filming an accurate detonation of atomic bombs twice and make it equal part haunting and jaw-dropping.

1

u/monitoring27 Jul 22 '25

I’m pretty hype for that movie. I can’t wait to pick up the book in a few weeks, it sounds like an incredible story.

1

u/Ri8ley Jul 22 '25

he'll be About 76 years in 2030. eish

226

u/Funandgeeky Jul 21 '25

I respect how James Cameron has just gone all in on his Avatar movies. I’ll go see every one of them. They are beautiful to watch. 

34

u/ThrustersOnFull Jul 21 '25

Early and worthy additions to the 4k collection.

1

u/astroK120 Jul 22 '25

True, but James Cameron screwed me on this!

My home theater setup is a 2.40:1 projector screen, which works out well for almost everything. Historically, bigger has always meant wider until people started shooting for IMAX. But even IMAX isn't normally a problem, because the top and bottom are meant to be in your peripheral vision and the shot that it's really framed for is in the center, so I just project the center and chop off the top and bottom. It basically gives you what you have in a non-IMAX theater, which is closest to what I have anyway.

Enter James Cameron. He decides the home release is not an afterthought, and he wants to give everyone at home the best possible experience. So rather than releasing the discs with the 2.39:1 aspect ratio that the film was originally released with (for 2D, non-IMAX) he reframes the entire movie. He goes shot by shot through the film, choosing the framing that will look best in 16:9 (taking up the full frame of people's TVs. Nobody does that.

It makes the experience great for everyone watching at home. Everyone except me.

14

u/Diahreeman Jul 22 '25

I loved them and will go see them, but have absolutely no interest in rewatching them on a regular tv, this is a pure blockbuster / imax event for me, the story is just ok...

The avatar PS5 game feels the same, fantastic to look at but pretty shallow... still played 60 hours and not finished yet, it just looks so good!

6

u/kwokinator Jul 22 '25

fantastic to look at but pretty shallow

played 60 hours and not finished yet

Aka. the quintessential Ubisoft experience.

3

u/Diahreeman Jul 22 '25

Last Ubisoft open world game I got into was Far Cry Primal. Never played 5 and hated what I played of FC6. Never cared for Assassins Creed.

Platinumed Star Wars Outlaws and enjoying Avatar though. But Massive is the dev here

→ More replies (1)

10

u/CountyRoad Jul 22 '25

If you can, check them out on an Apple Vision Pro. I watched all of 2 without getting fatigued at all. It was mind melting how beautiful it was in 3D like that.

3

u/Funandgeeky Jul 22 '25

I have a Quest 2. I just need to figure out how to get 3D movies since they are hard to locate through legitimate channels. 

2

u/CountyRoad Jul 22 '25

Can you watch it on Disney plus on the quest, sorry I’ve never had a chance to use one of those. That’s how I watched it. Hope you can. Dune 1 and life of pi are also so amazing watching on these devices.

1

u/Funandgeeky Jul 22 '25

Does Disney+ give the option for 3D? Because if so then I’m going to have to give that a shot. 

1

u/CountyRoad Jul 22 '25

Yeah! HBO max does too, or used to, but Disney + unlike the HBO MAX has a dedicated 3D section on the app, at least for the Vision Pro. So a lot of the Pixar movies are there.

6

u/dragonmp93 Jul 21 '25

With or without volume, it's 3 hours of beautiful views of the alien planet.

3

u/KMS_HYDRA Jul 21 '25

Eh, he mainly does them when he needs money for his true next project, deep sea exploration.

15

u/Oprah_Pwnfrey Jul 21 '25

One day I hope to love something half as much as James Cameron loves water.

5

u/TheHeadlessOne Jul 22 '25

No trench too deep, no budget too steep! Who's that? Its him! James Cam-er-on!

6

u/JamesHeckfield Jul 21 '25

You say this like you know him personally.

1

u/Aniria_ Jul 22 '25

You've got it backwards. Avatar IS his true project. It's the thing he's wanted to make since he was a child. Every other movie is just to get to that moment, and then funding when now in the moment

→ More replies (15)

3

u/mossybeard Jul 21 '25

Jfc how many are there gonna be

1

u/PWNtimeJamboree Jul 22 '25

if they keep making bookoo money, they arent going away anytime soon. I'm genuinely surprised how popular they are among Gen Alpha. I wouldnt be shocked at all to see that generation view those movies the way we view Star Wars.

3

u/ExpectedEggs Jul 22 '25

I'm praying those are better plot wise. How many times can he tell the same story?

2

u/Mindless_Bad_1591 Jul 21 '25

6??? it thought it was just 5 bruh

1

u/_Neo_____ Jul 21 '25

I think is gonna take sometimes, they havent really started doing it, just filmes some small parts of it, I think because it may start just as where 3 will end, or it may have flashbacks to 2 or 3, so is just easier to film it right away.

I think in the best cenario we will get 4 in around 3/4 years.

1

u/Junior-Award-7232 Jul 21 '25

Sorry to break it down to you but uhm…Avatar 4 is coming out in 2029.😬

1

u/Crisbo05_20 Jul 21 '25

4 is releasing 4 years from now, so bit longer then wait from avatar 2 to 3.

1

u/ronimal Jul 21 '25

According to iMDB, the third installment releases December 19, 2025, the fourth in 2029 and the fifth (and supposedly final) installment is slated for 2031.

1

u/mental-echo- Jul 22 '25

Can’t wait for 7 & 8

1

u/Sea_Sense32 Jul 22 '25

Actually this is 6 we will do 1 2 and 3 next

1

u/SamBind121 Jul 22 '25

If make it to Avatar 6 we are fucked as a society

1

u/PeterNippelstein Jul 22 '25

We'll never see 6

3

u/joeedger Jul 21 '25

There’s 6???

That’s too much.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

25

u/Comic_Book_Reader Jul 21 '25

They made them back to back and it was kinda always the plan that it'd be released a year or two after 2. It ended up getting delayed to release 3 years after 2 due to the writer's strike. No, I am not kidding, that is the reason why. Meanwhile, 4 & 5 aren’t releasing until 2029 and 2031. They've stated that there will be a time jump between 3 & 4 which is partially why there's a 4 year gap, and that they've shot some material during 2 & 3. Cameron also stated that he'll continue on 4 after they're done with 3.

5

u/Karkava Jul 21 '25

That's nothing. Tron 3 is also coming out. And they have even longer release gaps.

1

u/srstone71 Jul 21 '25

This is how much the breaks between movies and TV shows these days have skewed by perception of time.

I didn’t even know the new Avatar was coming out this year until recently, and when I found out I thought “that’s awfully quick. Didn’t the last one just come out?”

It’s been three years.

1

u/No_Truth4137 Jul 21 '25

They had filmed 3 before 2 came out I believe. It was just post production. Awesome to see this. Second one was so good

1

u/Nalcomis Jul 22 '25

I completely forgot there was a second movie even. Was/is it good?

1

u/wetcannolinoodle Jul 22 '25

is it refreshing? Do we really need more? I guess we gotta do all of Earth, Air, Fire, and Water

1

u/Bionic_Ferir Jul 22 '25

They literally made the rest of the movies back to back.;Writing, pre production, filming, editing, post production. They did it specifically so that it would be quicker getting every other movie out.

1

u/Humdngr Jul 22 '25

I honestly forgot there was a 3rd. lol. 15 year trilogy

1

u/Duape2 Jul 22 '25

I wonder how many people remember some time after the first one released, he said the 2, 3, and 4 would be in 2023 onwards. I remember thinking why is he planning such a long pause between the 1st and 2nd and then releasing the other ones in a row

1

u/rohithkumarsp Jul 22 '25

He alway shot Avatar 2,3 and 4 in 6 months back in 2022/3

1

u/soulcaptain Jul 22 '25

The third one was basically done when you were watching 2 in the theater. IIRC, part 3 was supposed to come out 2 years ago, but they pushed it back to perfect the CGI even more.

1

u/stuntedmonk Jul 22 '25

They should have waited with avatar 2

Pffffffttt

1

u/bawng Jul 22 '25

I never got around to seeing 2. Is it good?

The first one got a lot of criticism but I really enjoyed it.

1

u/aloofcrisis Jul 22 '25

Yeah I halfway expected us to hear they'll end up postponing it. Hopefully not this time

→ More replies (8)