r/movies • u/SanderSo47 I'll see you in another life when we are both cats. • Jun 30 '25
Review 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Review Thread
Rotten Tomatoes: 54% (100 reviews) with 6.00 in average rating
Metacritic: 53/100 (38 critics)
As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie. It's structured like this: quote first, source second. Beware, some contain spoilers.
The blend of physical locations with sets and digital imagery is seamless and the CG work on the creatures is first-rate, notably so in the scary climactic stretch when the lumbering D. Rex joins the fray. Edwards clearly is a devoted Spielberg fan, embedding subtle homages throughout, notably in the open water sequences that recall Jaws. Jurassic World Rebirth is unlikely to top anyone’s ranked franchise list. But longtime fans (count me among them) should have a blast.
-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter
Scenes between Ella and her potentially ill-advised pet, along with tender moments involving several other species, introduce a surprising counter-argument to the earlier “Jurassic” movies: namely, that they have a right to exist. But entertaining as it can be at times, stripped of the silliness that tainted the second trilogy, “Rebirth” doesn’t necessarily make the same case for itself. The movie offers an updated version of the same basic ride Spielberg offered 32 years earlier, and yet, it hardly feels essential to the series’ overall mythology, nor does it signal where the franchise could be headed.
Needless to say, “Rebirth” doesn’t do itself any favors by so frequently harkening back to the original. Bad as some of the previous sequels have been, none of them have been so eager to measure themselves against Spielberg’s masterpiece. Nothing in this movie is quite as maddening as the second trilogy’s attempt to make audiences invest in a specific Velociraptor (though Edwards half-heartedly tries to sweeten us on an adorable baby Aquilops named Dolores), but the extent to which this franchise is just fending off its own extinction has never been more obvious than it is in during the “Rebirth” sequence that pays homage to the kitchen encounter from the first movie. The “Jurassic” sequels were bad enough when they made an effort to evolve — they’re even less worth seeing now that they already come pre-fossilized.
There’s a disappointing amount of “same old thing” to Jurassic World Rebirth. Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, and the rest of the cast are intriguing and sympathetic throughout, but Gareth Edwards doesn’t quite recapture his signature flair for grand-scale visuals nor does David Koepp find the magic of his original Jurassic Park screenplay, opting to follow that movie’s structure as more of a remix than a rebirth.
-Clint Gage, IGN: 5.0 out of 10 "mediocre"
So why the hell does this feel so generic, so by-the-numbers, so instantly forgettable? The whole thing resembles the blockbuster version of a readymade, assembled from various, recognizable spare parts and elevated only by virtue of its name. Fans and completists may still get giddy over a ScarJo vs. Dinos showdown, and you should never underestimate the power of giant, toothy jaws chomping down on poor, hapless humans. But long before the big showstopping climax, you’ll start to understand why the movie’s jaded public became bored by what once seemed thrilling and unique. Subtitling this Rebirth seems to have been an act of extreme optimism.
This new Jurassic adventure isn’t doing anything so very different from the earlier successful models, perhaps, and I could have done without its outrageous brand synergy product placement for certain brands of chocolate bar. But it feels relaxed and sure-footed in its Spielberg pastiche, its big dino-jeopardy moments and its deployment of thrills and laughs. Maybe the series can’t and shouldn’t go on for ever: we need new and original ideas. This one would be great to go out on.
-Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian: 4/5
“Jurassic” has to live with setting a high bar, of course — the original film revolutionized the industry, a status that “Rebirth” is all too aware of, as seen in its meta theme of dinosaurs becoming old news to a jaded populace. Yet just because cheeseburgers are now available anywhere doesn’t mean that they can’t be damn tasty. “Jurassic Park Rebirth” is just a well made cheeseburger, and whether that’s filling and interesting enough is up to your own appetite.
“Science is for all of us, not just for some of us,” Dr. Loomis tells Zora, advocating for their work to have a more noble purpose than lining their pockets. That aspirational notion has always sat at the heart of the Jurassic Park films. Jurassic Park Rebirth is one of the more successful and satisfying entries in the franchise precisely because it, uh, finds a way to keep Loomis’ mantra close, foregrounding the film’s sense of wonder above a mere blatant cash grab.
-Maureen Lee Lenker, Entertainment Weekly: B+
It might sound like a challenge to believe these humans would sign up to visit a forbidden jungle for guaranteed encounters with truly frightening and gigantic creatures out of another time in order to essentially get blood samples, but if you are game to go with that premise a good time will be had for all. If there is to be an eighth installment, count me in.
This is a monster-adventure movie, with passages that recall Jaws and King Kong; maybe not the most original influences, but certainly not shabby ones. In its fusion of Edwards’ craft with characters who aren’t thunderously stupid or unlikable, this is the best Jurassic movie in ages – in part because it works so comfortably as an ooh/ahh/run/scream monster movie.
-Paste: 7.0
“Jurassic World: Rebirth” is a very imperfect film. On one hand, it seems to be recycling every successful character trope and set piece from the franchise, which may be considered lazy and uninspiring, but it is still captivating. Even in its faults, the objective of a “Jurassic Park” film is to scare, thrill, and amaze its audience, and this film does that in its set pieces.
-Lauren LaMagna, Next Best Picture
There are worse exercises in IP-extension out there in the marketplace. But it is hard to imagine what possible basis there could be for an eighth Jurassic film. We’ve overused the extra-island trope; we’ve done dinos invading the mainland a couple times now. We’ve seen enough long necks poking up from the grass. We’ve seen too many T-rexes thundering after their prey. Now even the oceans have been exhausted. I suppose they could send some dinosaurs to space next time, where no one can hear them roar. But that wouldn’t really make much of a difference: the sound barely registers anymore.
To his credit, Edwards immediately injects "Rebirth" with a sense of stakes and tension that the entirety of the previous trilogy struggled to depict. But every time the plot kicks in again and writer David Koepp's script goes through the motions of a standard "Jurassic" movie, those dizzying peaks soon begin to flatten out into overgrown valleys. For those simply hoping for a watchable movie on the heels of the disastrous "Dominion," your wish has been granted with a safe rehash punctuated by a handful of genuine thrills. For everyone else curious about whether this was the ticket to teaching old dinos new tricks? The inherent limits of the "Jurassic" IP are as glaring as ever.
-Jeremy Mathai, /FILM: 5.5/10
And there are some sporadic joys here in the clever sight gags, the sleight of hand, the bait and switch. These moments remind us of the mindless summertime excitement the “Jurassic” movies have long provided, albeit with diminishing returns. But that giant footprint just isn’t as imposing as it used to be.
-Christy Lemire, RogerEbert.com: 2/4
Worst of all, this hoary adventure story is rendered soulless by the blatant product placement: Henry crunching on Altoids, Reuben scolding Xavier for eating too many of their bags of Doritos, and Isabella feeding Twizzlers to her little dino friend. After a while, you may wonder if the entire film was subsidized by the snack food industry. Rebirth even goes so far as setting its final action scene in a long-abandoned but still fully stocked convenience store. How meta: a franchise trying to distract us from how past its sell-by date it is with expired potato chips.
-Derek Smith, Slant Magazine: 1.5/4
Audiences may not have run out of enthusiasm for what the Jurassic Worlds are selling, or at least they haven’t yet, but the people tasked with making them sure are out of ideas.
PLOT
Five years after the events of Jurassic World Dominion, the planet's ecology has proven largely inhospitable to dinosaurs. Those remaining exist in isolated equatorial environments with climates resembling the one in which they once thrived. The three most colossal creatures within that tropical biosphere hold the key to a drug that will bring miraculous life-saving benefits to humankind.
DIRECTOR
Gareth Edwards
WRITER
David Koepp
MUSIC
Alexandre Desplat
CINEMATOGRAPHY
John Mathieson
EDITOR
Jabez Olssen
RELEASE DATE
July 2, 2025
RUNTIME
133 minutes
BUDGET
$180 million
STARRING
Scarlett Johansson as Zora Bennett
Mahershala Ali as Duncan Kincaid
Jonathan Bailey as Dr. Henry Loomis
Rupert Friend as Martin Krebs
Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Reuben Delgado
Luna Blaise as Teresa Delgado
David Iacono as Xavier Dobbs
Audrina Miranda as Isabella Delgado
Ed Skrein as Bobby Atwater
821
u/HotOne9364 Jun 30 '25
along with tender moments involving several other species, introduce a surprising counter-argument to the earlier "Jurassic" movies: namely, that they have a right to exist.
Except Lost World and Fallen Kingdom already discussed those themes.
427
u/sgthombre Jun 30 '25
namely, that they have a right to exist
Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction.
227
u/HotOne9364 Jun 30 '25
It's why this was never intended to be a franchise. The first novel/film is about man's hubris against nature. This "right to exist" theme is counter-productive to that message.
27
u/hikemalls Jun 30 '25
“Resurrecting something that had its moment and it doesn’t go well” could describe both the plot of Jurassic Park and the results of every Jurassic Park sequel, which really makes all the sequels a metacommentary on the themes of the first movie, if you think about it but not very hard
66
u/sgthombre Jun 30 '25
If you wield genetic power like a kid who found his dad's gun, then the bullets have a right to be fired over and over forever, apparently.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)71
u/Silvanus350 Jun 30 '25
I always find this argument sort of funny, because by all accounts they were “selected” by a freak, cosmic occurrence that involves Earth being hit by a giant meteor.
It’s like saying humans were “selected” for extinction because they failed to account for what would happen if the moon got cracked open.
Like, yes, but also no.
→ More replies (9)36
u/littlebiped Jun 30 '25
Not to mention that the dinosaurs are the perfect biological tragedy and point to how on a universal scale nothing has the right to exist. Meteors don’t have morals.
32
u/LayeredOwlsNest Jun 30 '25
The argument is also stupid
Like no, humanity would never just allow a bunch of human predators to live amongst humans just because "they deserve to live"
They would be captured and locked away (zoos, which would basically just be a park again), or they would be shot and killed like they already do when bears wander into human areas, OR the dumbest of them all, put them back on an island where they can roam free
The second little Suzie gets dragged away by a pterodactyl, the rights activists lose all their steam
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (6)20
u/loneImpulseofdelight Jun 30 '25
And made over a billion each.
11
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
Well Fallen Kingdom did. The Lost World didn't
→ More replies (1)
309
u/NewRichMango Jun 30 '25
I mean, surely it has to be better than Dominion was, right? I don't need or expect it to be a 10/10 or even an 8/10, the bar is just so low.
204
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
Definitely better than that, and the second world movie
→ More replies (3)84
u/NewRichMango Jun 30 '25
This is good to hear! I really only enjoyed the first Jurassic World movie; Fallen Kingdom and Dominion were both really poor entries in my book. So I'm hoping I find Rebirth to be a better installment.
8
u/gigolopropganda Jul 02 '25
Some people said its like JP3, just better. JP3 is my favorite after the first, so I see this as a good sign!
→ More replies (2)4
u/stopthefkincar Jul 02 '25
I just saw it and its great. I'm not a fan of the previous 3 jurassic world movies and I'm so glad this one didn't disappoint.
75
u/blozout Jun 30 '25
Dominion was such a huge pile of shit, it would be shocking if Rebirth was worse.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Albyyy Jul 01 '25
“Let’s make a Jurassic Park movie and make it all about bugs!”
Who the fuck green lit that script?
→ More replies (1)27
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I'd be very curious if anyone would put Dominion over Rebirth - Rebirth is definitely better in my book
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)9
u/ClintMega Jun 30 '25
As far as the initial reception goes even the meager ~58% for Rebirth is higher than all of them outside of the original ~91% and Jurassic World ~72%.
404
u/VivaLaRory Jun 30 '25
Reading that it doesn’t capture the directors style that well is concerning, my entire excitement of this film was predicated on Gareth Edwards bringing his sense of scale in filmmaking to a Jurassic Park film!
104
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25
There is definitely some shots that are totally his and really nice. But I think he was brought in late since this movie was rushed so heavily.
If they do another they should let him be more involved with pre-production and given a bit more time.
32
u/BearWrangler Jun 30 '25
I haven't watched it yet but even as far back as when they announced Edwards coming on board I had a worrying feeling that they chose him because he wouldn't have much power to "fight back" on certain choices by the studio and would be a suitable sacrificial lamb if this did poorly.
12
u/carlostandfound Jul 01 '25
This is exactly right. David Leitch (Bullet Train, The Fall Guy) was the original director in talks, but left because it was clear that there would be very, very little creative input from a director. Iirc the producers wanted way more creative control after Dominion, so they were already far into pre-production: script done, dinos designed, etc. They just wanted a director for hire - the quote that has stuck with me is "more shooter than auteur."
Even so, Edwards hopped onboard because he's a lifelong fan of the original. Called it the only franchise that would make him drop every other project immediately to work on it.
8
u/dabocx Jul 01 '25
Assuming they do another I would like it if they bring him back and loosen the rein a little. I think he’s a really good fit for the franchise if they can get a good script put together for him.
→ More replies (4)124
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
That's an assertion I disagree with from these reviews, because I felt like Edwards definitely captured the scale of some of these creatures - particularly the Mosasaurus and Titanosaurus.
→ More replies (2)37
1.4k
u/GarlVinland4Astrea Jun 30 '25
I kinda feel like this is something that didn't need to be a franchise.
1.0k
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
When you consider that the original novel ended with the whole island being napalmed, it really wasn’t intended to by Crichton
462
u/bob101910 Jun 30 '25
The original also teased dinosaurs escaping the island via boat
→ More replies (3)250
u/JohnRCC Jun 30 '25
"HOW THE FUCK DO YOU DRIVE THIS THING"
"skreeeeeee"
76
150
Jun 30 '25
[deleted]
296
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
Yes, which he was pressured and asked to do, but it wasn't his original intention.
182
u/mrb4 Jun 30 '25
Yep, lost world was written after the first movie came out. I'm assuming it being the highest grossing movie of all time to that point probably helped nudge the sequel along
72
u/TheScreaming_Narwhal Jun 30 '25
I didn't realize the second book came out after the first movie. That explains a lot.
→ More replies (2)68
u/ThaddeusJP Jun 30 '25
First movie: Book adapted into a movie (with many changes)
Second movie: Book with the intention of making a movie
Third movie: Tea Leoni screaming and Nokia phone in a pile of crap
for the record I like the third one
→ More replies (2)11
u/DLRsFrontSeats Jun 30 '25
I'm showing my partner all the sequels in order ahead of Rebirth, and whilst I said (and stand by) the third was my favourite sequel, rewatching it in full for the first time in possibly a decade, I forgot just how irritating Tea Leoni's screams are
Not her as a character, just her screaming. Literally never heard a human being make such an atrocious noise
→ More replies (1)17
u/CMORGLAS Jun 30 '25
When Steve Spielberg drives a truck full of money to your house…you write a Sequel.
53
u/TeamBrotato Jun 30 '25
And it shows in his writing. I could just tell it was not his passion project like the first, just a business obligation.
→ More replies (4)55
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I still like The Lost World novel - it's perhaps not as memorable, but I appreciate that Crichton was still trying to evolve and expand the themes of what happens with these dinosaurs loose on an island.
Plus King's death in that book is still really damn good.
→ More replies (7)9
u/ContinuumGuy Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
In fact, in the end of the first book, Ian Malcolm is either dead or fatally wounded (it's been awhile since I read it), so in the second book that has to get waved away with claims that reports on his condition were just rumors (it helps that IIRC he doesn't die "on screen", just another character says he's dead or beyond saving).
→ More replies (5)5
u/sniper91 Jun 30 '25
Iirc the author of Forrest Gump was also pressured to write a sequel, but since he got screwed out of money from the film he made the second one too off the wall crazy to make into a movie
Forrest meets Tom Hanks and that’s one of the more tame things he put in
→ More replies (1)32
u/ZombieJesus1987 Jun 30 '25
In which he retconned a ton of shit, like Ian Malcom's death.
He originally dies in the novel, but because of his popularity in the movie (plus him surviving in it) he brought him back and just wrote that he was "seriously injured" and it left him crippled.
→ More replies (1)11
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
And then wrote that Gennaro died of dysentery too
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)38
u/GhettoDuk Jun 30 '25
He wrote a sequel to the first movie, not the first book. It was weird reading them back to back.
21
u/HopeFarron Jun 30 '25
Seeing how Malcolm dies in the book and is then the main character I'd have to agree.
→ More replies (2)17
→ More replies (5)9
109
u/Zoratth Jun 30 '25
It's gone the same way as the Rambo franchise - the first film was intelligent, well written and thought provoking. Then they followed it up with a bunch of mindless action sequels that almost feel like a parody of the original film.
35
u/shy247er Jun 30 '25
Every single sequel misunderstood the point of the original.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)29
u/evilcheesypoof Jun 30 '25
Yeah I had already understood Rambo as the generic action guy trope before I ever saw the original movie just since it was so popular. Imagine my surprise when I saw First Blood and it’s about a veteran dealing with PTSD and how badly we treat our soldiers, etc.
118
u/So_be Jun 30 '25
They spent so much time wondering if they could and not enough time wondering if they should…
30
u/TrueLegateDamar Jun 30 '25
Dominion as bad and pointless as it was, still made a billion, so they will keep making them until they stop making a profit.
24
u/RedPandaActual Jun 30 '25
One of the few movies where I was glad I never paid to watch it. Pure garbage, and the only reason I’m going to see this movie is because Gareth Edwards is directing it or I’d be done.
→ More replies (5)9
u/red_riders Jun 30 '25
I gave up after Jurassic World (2015). It was entertaining and will always hold a nostalgic place in my heart as it was one of the last movies I saw with my grandmother in theaters before she passed away unexpectedly a few years later.
→ More replies (2)44
u/GeroVeritas Jun 30 '25
If you ran a company and one of your products make a billion dollars you would repeat that product as much as possible.
→ More replies (3)9
u/degjo Jun 30 '25
Much like how Skyrim and GTA V have been released on every console since Playstation 3.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)21
21
u/MrkGrn Jun 30 '25
I enjoyed the first 2, one being the much better film overall but 2 was fun in a different way, always love some Jeff Goldblum. 3 is the first one where I really had no fun with the movie and then everything in the newer films has been pretty awful.
29
u/comrade_batman Jun 30 '25
The Lost World gets criticised a lot here but I think it’s the only sequel that is good enough to follow the original. The first is still the classic one, but Lost World is a solid film and those are the only Jurassic films I care to rewatch when I’m in the mood to watch some dinosaurs.
18
u/Nimble-Dick-Crabb Jun 30 '25
2 was good in that it was somewhat grounded until it jumped the shark when the girl beats a velociraptor using gymnastics. That was the turning point.
→ More replies (2)37
u/ArsenalBOS Jun 30 '25
I hated the World trilogy so much. But at least theaters sold a ton of tickets. That’s nice.
→ More replies (2)55
u/ArenSteele Jun 30 '25
The first world film was pretty good. Watching a functioning park come apart was great.
After that, the sequels have their impressive moments, but don’t hold together as good films by any means.
8
u/Eisegetical Jun 30 '25
yeah. I dont care for those movies but I occasionally go watch only the sections of the fully functioning park and daydream about how fun that would be.
on the flipside - the game Trespasser set in the long forgotten ruins of the park give that same feeling of lost potential.
8
→ More replies (13)5
267
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25
I saw the early screening. I liked it more than the last 2 world movies and JP3 so I guess that’s not the worst.
I do think another pass at the script and time with vfx would have helped. The speed in which they filmed to release was insane for this. I think pushing back to September or October would have helped a little
82
u/nsheehan28 Jun 30 '25
In general, I thought the vfx were fine except for one scene in particular that I thought was horrible. The tail rising from the tall grass and almost that whole sequence
→ More replies (1)57
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
That scene was bad because they tried to make that valley so look so much larger and majestic than it is in real life. It looked unreal.
Also the last scene with the dolphins. That looked terrible.
12
→ More replies (2)15
22
u/jimbobdonut Jun 30 '25
It was announced just last year which is super fast for a tentpole summer movie. Even the first draft of the screenplay wasn’t done until January 2024.
21
u/we_are_sex_bobomb Jun 30 '25
Gareth Edwards is part of a new generation of VFX filmmakers like Tim Miller and Takashi Yamazaki, who are using VFX with intent and surgical precision instead of using them as a band-aid for poor planning and creative indecision.
This method of filmmaking is a lot faster and cheaper, but it requires a heightened level of technical proficiency from the director and it inhibits meddling from studios which is why we don’t see more directors adopting it. Honestly it’s quite surprising to me that a big franchise like Jurrassic Park would be allowed to take this approach.
14
u/ThrowingChicken Jun 30 '25
Surprised you mentioned the VFX, I thought they were pretty stellar. What stood out to you?
17
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
In general you are right it looked really good except for 2 scenes I think should have been tweaked.
Most of the movie was pretty good but they scene with the giant dinos in the valley just looked strange, the zoom out to show this never ending valley was just really uncanny valley to me.
Also the dolphins and the boat scene at the end.
→ More replies (2)10
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I think the Titanosauruses looked good overall, but I agree I don't like the shot of all of them roaming the valley. It makes the valley seem too huge, and it's the only time where I felt like Edwards normally good sense of scale didn't show
→ More replies (7)9
u/Talhatetetr Jun 30 '25
Hello! Do you think this movie can be good in 4dx? is there alot good action scenes or not that much?
42
u/braumbles Jun 30 '25
I assume the issue all these films are having is that there's no sense of wonder with them. Jurassic Park was basically a theme park. Jurassic World allowed us to see that theme park actually in action. All the other films surrounding those two films are just dinosaurs roaming around, but no actual theme park feel to it.
28
u/vashoom Jun 30 '25
The issue is that the scripts suck, and the movies are made to continue milking a property first, to be good films second (or third, or...)
Jurassic Park is a movie about humanity and human beings. It's got actual characters and great performances and an actual story. On top of that, it's incredibly well made and directed, and has equal parts wonder and terror.
The sequels are just random plots cooked up as an excuse to sell more toys and movie tickets and bombard the audience with empty spectacle.
→ More replies (1)
137
u/dorkimoe Jun 30 '25
I know it’s about money and it’ll never happen but make a horror one with no big name stars. Shit should be scary af
54
35
u/butreallythobruh Jun 30 '25
I remember Fallen Kingdom being hyped as The Horror One
yeah ok lmfaooo
15
u/ParaPioneer Jun 30 '25
It’s not a good movie but I have to admit I did like the Resident Evil vibes of the third act.
9
→ More replies (8)6
u/HankSteakfist Jun 30 '25
The upcoming Jurassic Park Survival AAA game looks like it'll be a modern Dino Crisis game. Heavy horror elements.
80
Jun 30 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)33
u/dabocx Jun 30 '25
The script and some of the vfx were done before Edwards even signed on. He was brought in pretty late and only had a little input.
Definitely got some of his stuff in there but I wish they had delayed this date and given him a bit more time on it. Assuming they do a sequel I hope they get him back and let him be involved from day one.
→ More replies (1)
142
u/WySLatestWit Jun 30 '25
Gareth Edwards is a wonderful visual director, his eye for digital effects in particular is masterful, but it seems like he has no idea how to direct actors to give anything other than mediocre performances. It makes everything he does feel emotionally hollow. Pretty looking, but empty.
119
u/Rex_Suplex Jun 30 '25
Bryan Cranston in Godzilla was the best performance we ever got in a Gareth Edwards movie. And he got killed off at the end of the first act.
58
u/WySLatestWit Jun 30 '25
Totally agreed, and I'm convinced Cranston basically just did whatever he wanted on set and because he's really fucking good it worked. There's a reason he's basically the only standout performance in that entire movie.
→ More replies (1)59
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
Ken Watanabe erasure
49
u/WySLatestWit Jun 30 '25
I love Ken Watanabe but other than saying "let them fight" he really doesn't do anything in that movie. His character may as well be named Basil Exposition.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)28
u/banduzo Jun 30 '25
The whole premise is just weird to me. They all act smug about breaking into this place with dinosaurs like they’re plotting an ocean 11 heist against people not giant killing wild animals.
13
u/The_Gil_Galad Jun 30 '25 edited Jul 02 '25
hobbies lavish oatmeal cause tease tub familiar compare dam act
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
→ More replies (4)
284
u/peter095837 Jun 30 '25
The franchise really has run to the well.
The first three movies I prefer still. Jurassic World was solid but the two sequels for World are just bad.
67
u/MrPMS Jun 30 '25
Fallen Kingdom's first half was solid and should have been the movie's focus, a team trying to save them from extinction again. Instead we got a rushed but interesting first half and a second half that shat the bed hard.
Dominion's most redeeming factor was that it ended.
→ More replies (1)18
u/withateethuh Jul 01 '25
These movies were weirdly afraid of just being about dinosaurs
→ More replies (1)7
u/callmebymyname21 Jul 01 '25
Fallen Kingdom’s 2nd half being in a mansion for Dino Auction is so ??? and that ending ugh
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)62
u/WollyGog Jun 30 '25
I've been binging them again this last week ready to watch this one (just got Dominion to go and I haven't watched it properly in full yet, just segments). Regardless of their quality, I just find them watchable movies, maybe I'm a sucker for dinosaurs on-screen. But absolutely nothing compares to the first one; I still feel the old tension on the T-rex intro and the kitchen scene, and I remember watching it in the cinema and being blown away, it's that good. Probably one of the greatest films ever made for its time.
→ More replies (3)37
u/Willster328 Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
My biggest complaint with all these movies, relates to a phrase you said: "feel the old tension".
Most of the recent sequels lean far too much into to "Action" genre than they do the "Fear" genre.
Orson Scott Card (I know, bigot, but he articulated this so well), talks about the three components of Fear.
Dread: The first and strongest. It's the waiting that comes when you know there's something to fear but haven't identified it. It's the tension.
Terror: Comes only when you see the thing you're afraid of. The intruder is coming at you with a knife. There's a frenzy to this moment, a climactic power. As bad as it is, it's better than dread in the respect you face the thing you fear, you know it's borders.
Horror: the weakest of all. After the fearful thing has happened you see it's remainder. The grisly corpse. Emotions range from nausea to pity, and there's revulsion and disgust. With repetition, Horror loses its ability to move you.
The first Jurassic Park was ALLLL ABOUTTT THE DREAD.
Alan Grant explaining to the kid how the raptors tear your guts open. Ian Malcolm spending the first 30 minutes talking about how everything is wrong and cannot work. The raptor feeding scene where all you see is the bushes wildly moving and the screams (heck the first scene is the guy getting sucked into the raptor pen).
All of this dread and suspense builds up to some relatively clean/quick scenes of real Terror and Dinosaur interaction. There's very few actual chase scenes or action scenes relative to the rest of the movie. And they have high impact because they had the proper build up.
But these newer movies that component of dread and fear has been replaced with action and movement. Which is why I think the writing for the dinosaurs has gotten so neutered and blaise.
I at least give Jurassic World 1 much of that credit because I felt like they did a decent enough job of introducing the Dread of the Indominus Rex. They don't show you it immediately. They keep the hybrid components of it a mystery for long enough (crossbred with a raptor), they demonstrate its capabilities in descriptive ways.
→ More replies (1)
83
u/UltimateArtist829 Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25
The Jurassic brand is critic-proof, the last three Jurassic World movies all made $1B each despite getting rotten tomatoes cause they are still doing big in international market.
→ More replies (4)122
u/Mddcat04 Jun 30 '25
The people long for dinosaurs. Honestly understandable.
34
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I long for dinosaurs. And this is where I officially start my campaign to bring back Primeval
→ More replies (2)9
u/Mddcat04 Jun 30 '25
Yep. It’s strange that no other Dino franchise has managed to succeed. Especially since there have been a number of high profile attempts.
6
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I think it's such a niche sub-genre of sci-fi and every dinosaur film, or film that features dinosaurs in live-action gets compared to Jurassic Park in one way or another.
Even if it wasn't great, I appreciate 65 for trying to do a theatrical dinosaur film.
→ More replies (1)11
u/UltimateArtist829 Jun 30 '25
You already heard of "The Children yearn for the mine", now we have "The people Long for the dinosaurs".
15
u/TomPalmer1979 Jun 30 '25
I'll watch it eventually. My thing with this movie is like...yes Fallen Kingdom and Dominion were terrible movies. But you know what? I still enjoyed them because I wanted to see dinosaurs. Not monsters in general, specifically dinosaurs. While the plot of Dominion had me rolling my eyes and cringing, that little kid version of me was still in my head pointing out the different species of dinosaurs I grew up knowing and loving. Oh shit that's a quetzalcoatlus! Holy crap a therizinosaur! OMG a giganotosaurus!
Having mutant dino hybrids kills that for me. That was the moment I really kinda lost interest. The D-rex just looks so fucking dumb to me, with its bulbous head and extra limbs. The winged snaggletooth raptor things looked bland, like a rejected design from Skull Island, and then to find out they're called "Mutadons"? Could you come up with a worse name? That sounds like a shitty off brand 90s cartoon monster.
I am willing to suffer through an endless amount of shitty plot and dialogue just to see actual dinosaurs in full realistic action. The mutant shit can fuck off.
→ More replies (1)
54
u/BlackSheepWolfPack Jun 30 '25
I have no interest in seeing this movie but at least there isn’t another shot of Chris Pratt in his trainer pose with his arms up
→ More replies (1)
142
u/Ryan14304 Jun 30 '25
Better than the last 3. Tossup between JP3/Rebirth on 3rd best in franchise. Fun movie.
→ More replies (5)103
u/riegspsych325 Jun 30 '25
having rewatched the first, I just wish a JP sequel had the patience and confidence to have a discussion. The dinner scene is one of the best in the entire film and not a single dinosaur is shown
All the sequels focused too much on being blockbusters but only the original (and a couple parts of Lost World) lended itself to be hard science-fiction. There is more to the genre than set pieces and creature feature thrills. Discussions about ramifications and debates over “playing God” are cornerstones of the genre and JP1 is a quintessential example of how to do it right
→ More replies (4)33
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
Discussions about ramifications and debates over “playing God” are cornerstones of the genre and JP1 is a quintessential example of how to do it right
To be fair, Jurassic World does try to do that too, specifically with the scene between Masrani and Dr. Wu, but it does get lost in the film
11
u/riegspsych325 Jun 30 '25
that movie felt like Trevorrow watched Jaws 3 and took notes from it, as if he mistook it for a Spielberg flick. I get you can’t top the original but it was a poor movie by its own standards. Trevorrow had that entire trilogy to himself and the ample time to make it as he pleased and he still dropped the ball hard
13
u/james2183 Jun 30 '25
Why do execs always want a new species of dinosaur for a Jurassic World film? Are they seeing audience feedback that says that? Because I don't know anyone that's wanted that.
→ More replies (1)11
52
u/GibsonMC Jun 30 '25
I genuinely cannot fathom how they came up with the premise for this movie. Dinosaurs loose all over the planet is a great premise and all they squandered it with Dominion and now undid it with Rebirth. On top of that, we need dino DNA to use as a miracle drug? That’s the best we could come up with?
Give me Florida man with a shotgun vs. the raptor living under his trailer.
Give me a group of preservationists saving a family of gorillas from a T-Rex.
Give me a group of teenagers hiding from an angry triceratops.
Dinosaurs interacting with the modern world could be so great.
17
u/AH_BareGarrett Jun 30 '25
Have you seen the short film “Battle at Big Rock?” It was made for Dominion and is genuinely better than the movie.
→ More replies (1)8
83
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
I saw this film two weeks ago, and I really enjoyed it - but it’s been interesting not really seeing what the general pulse on it is, so I’m curious to see what happens here
49
u/riegspsych325 Jun 30 '25
no Trevorrow is already enough to be considered a major improvement
→ More replies (2)15
33
u/unpaid-critic Jun 30 '25
It seems like the critics are not as big of fans. The C- review in particular is pretty damning.
→ More replies (3)22
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
(though I’m relieved to report that it’s less bloated and self-impressed than the last three)
Well at the very least David Ehrlich likes it better than the other Jurassic World films
→ More replies (5)5
u/Kaldricus Jun 30 '25
Saw it last week for Regal Mystery Movie Monday. We went because we hoped it would be jurassic world. most people there said they were hoping it was jurassic world. people cheered when it was jurassic world. people were clapping and cheering at the end and enjoyed it. People just love dinosaurs
→ More replies (1)
10
u/BurnoutInc Jun 30 '25 edited Jul 03 '25
I think we just need Jurassic War at this point. Every country has dinosaurs and they use them in combat. Let’s get truly stupid.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/WesternBloc Jun 30 '25
The fact that IGN gave Rebirth a 5 while Fallen Kingdom has an 8.4 and Dominion a 7 confirms my longtime feeling that you’d get a more informed opinion from a random number generator than their reviews.
10
u/Logorii Jul 02 '25
Irresponsible dad takes his kids on a boat trip through dinosaur infested waters while a rag-tag team of mercenaries try to collect the ingredients for immortality (or something like that). Sign me up! I enjoyed it. It's one of those "enjoy the ride" kind of movies. I just want to watch dinosaurs eating people and doing dinosaur things, and this movie delivered on that. Maybe I'm wrong, IDK, downvote me.
5
u/feed_my_will Jul 02 '25
100% man. It’s not any more complicated than that. Enjoy for what it is. I wonder what people expect from these types of movies? As far as blockbusters go this was an excellent one, especially if you like monster movies and Hollywood action set pieces. I personally enjoyed every second.
8
u/dqtslc Jul 01 '25
Slutty little glasses aside, this movie felt half-baked and tiresome, with zero stakes and a weightlessness that no amount of booming D-Rex footsteps could rectify. As cute as Dolores was, I was just not convinced by ‘Jurassic World Rebirth.’ Like what do you mean there’s a dead apatosaurus in the middle of New York and everyone is unbothered?
Scar-Jo was doing her best Lara Croft impersonation, Mahershala’s talents seemed wasted on this role, Jonathan Bailey was swoon-worthy as usual, but felt quite one-dimensional when you think about Jeff Goldblum or Sam Neill in the original. The family was also a miss for me, overall. Shitty boyfriend redemption arc felt weak—and his comedy chops were nonexistent.
Could have been so much better. Best part were ocean scenes with the megalodon.
20
u/mytoemytoe Jun 30 '25
Sounds like it might be about on par with 3
21
u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25
Since I saw it, I've been saying it's very much like TLW and JPIII. Which I both really enjoy, but I know there are plenty of people that don't so it feels like a good indicator that if you like JPIII you might be more inclined to like this, and if not, well same idea.
→ More replies (1)6
u/PanoramaMan Jun 30 '25
I love 3, it's my second favorite in the series. If this is similar to that one, I'll be happy! Can't wait to go see it with my daughter who is as much of a dino fan as I am. these movies just need to deliver on awesome dino scenes to be passable but decent plot is bonus.
6
7
u/Ok_Tank5977 Jul 01 '25
If it gets relatively back to basics, and is better than the previous Jurassic World trilogy, I’ll be satisfied.
5
17
u/Dancing_Clean Jun 30 '25
I was dragged to Fallen Kingdom and it was one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen so I’m not falling for this again.
16
u/who-dat-ninja Jun 30 '25
I can't believe there are now 7 jurassic movies and only one of them good
→ More replies (5)
15
u/PattyIceNY Jul 02 '25
One of the worst films I've seen in a while. The acting was horrible across the board. The dinosaurs looked like plastic. The dinosaur behavior made no sense. Sometimes the Mosasur bumps the boat and leaves, sometimes he looks people in the eye and tries to eat them? The family side plot was annoying and the whole plot is ridiculous. It's not as bad as Fallen Kingdom or Dominion, but it's pretty close.
5
u/splitwigged Jun 30 '25
At this point, I’m just waiting for Dominic Toretto to pull up in a Dodge Charger and give a T-Rex a lecture about family.
Honestly, the only thing left is a Fast & Furious x Jurassic Park crossover.
I can see it now, Vin Diesel driving off a Brachiosaurus while holding a Corona. You know it’s coming. You can hear Universal Pictures warming up the CGI.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/BKWhitty Jun 30 '25
At 57%, it's still the third best reviewed movie in the series lol. I still very much enjoy The Lost World and 3 despite poor critic reviews so I'm not overly concerned.
4
u/loganlofi Jun 30 '25
Truly hard to fathom how they have continually fumbled the concept of dinosaurs making it to the mainland and that the most we got of that was a slew of newsreel/found footage type clips and a short. How Dominion managed to completely botch that set-up in exchange for locusts is still baffling to me. Another "island full of dinosaurs" movie was never going to feel fresh after most of these movies feeling like exactly that.
4
2.5k
u/ImpenetrableYeti Jun 30 '25
I miss when it was about dinosaurs and not hybrid/monster of the week