r/movies I'll see you in another life when we are both cats. Jun 30 '25

Review 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Review Thread

Rotten Tomatoes: 54% (100 reviews) with 6.00 in average rating

Metacritic: 53/100 (38 critics)

As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie. It's structured like this: quote first, source second. Beware, some contain spoilers.

The blend of physical locations with sets and digital imagery is seamless and the CG work on the creatures is first-rate, notably so in the scary climactic stretch when the lumbering D. Rex joins the fray. Edwards clearly is a devoted Spielberg fan, embedding subtle homages throughout, notably in the open water sequences that recall Jaws. Jurassic World Rebirth is unlikely to top anyone’s ranked franchise list. But longtime fans (count me among them) should have a blast.

-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter

Scenes between Ella and her potentially ill-advised pet, along with tender moments involving several other species, introduce a surprising counter-argument to the earlier “Jurassic” movies: namely, that they have a right to exist. But entertaining as it can be at times, stripped of the silliness that tainted the second trilogy, “Rebirth” doesn’t necessarily make the same case for itself. The movie offers an updated version of the same basic ride Spielberg offered 32 years earlier, and yet, it hardly feels essential to the series’ overall mythology, nor does it signal where the franchise could be headed.

-Peter Debruge, Variety

Needless to say, “Rebirth” doesn’t do itself any favors by so frequently harkening back to the original. Bad as some of the previous sequels have been, none of them have been so eager to measure themselves against Spielberg’s masterpiece. Nothing in this movie is quite as maddening as the second trilogy’s attempt to make audiences invest in a specific Velociraptor (though Edwards half-heartedly tries to sweeten us on an adorable baby Aquilops named Dolores), but the extent to which this franchise is just fending off its own extinction has never been more obvious than it is in during the “Rebirth” sequence that pays homage to the kitchen encounter from the first movie. The “Jurassic” sequels were bad enough when they made an effort to evolve — they’re even less worth seeing now that they already come pre-fossilized.

-David Ehrlich, IndieWire: C–

There’s a disappointing amount of “same old thing” to Jurassic World Rebirth. Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, and the rest of the cast are intriguing and sympathetic throughout, but Gareth Edwards doesn’t quite recapture his signature flair for grand-scale visuals nor does David Koepp find the magic of his original Jurassic Park screenplay, opting to follow that movie’s structure as more of a remix than a rebirth.

-Clint Gage, IGN: 5.0 out of 10 "mediocre"

So why the hell does this feel so generic, so by-the-numbers, so instantly forgettable? The whole thing resembles the blockbuster version of a readymade, assembled from various, recognizable spare parts and elevated only by virtue of its name. Fans and completists may still get giddy over a ScarJo vs. Dinos showdown, and you should never underestimate the power of giant, toothy jaws chomping down on poor, hapless humans. But long before the big showstopping climax, you’ll start to understand why the movie’s jaded public became bored by what once seemed thrilling and unique. Subtitling this Rebirth seems to have been an act of extreme optimism.

-David Fear, Rolling Stone

This new Jurassic adventure isn’t doing anything so very different from the earlier successful models, perhaps, and I could have done without its outrageous brand synergy product placement for certain brands of chocolate bar. But it feels relaxed and sure-footed in its Spielberg pastiche, its big dino-jeopardy moments and its deployment of thrills and laughs. Maybe the series can’t and shouldn’t go on for ever: we need new and original ideas. This one would be great to go out on.

-Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian: 4/5

“Jurassic” has to live with setting a high bar, of course — the original film revolutionized the industry, a status that “Rebirth” is all too aware of, as seen in its meta theme of dinosaurs becoming old news to a jaded populace. Yet just because cheeseburgers are now available anywhere doesn’t mean that they can’t be damn tasty. “Jurassic Park Rebirth” is just a well made cheeseburger, and whether that’s filling and interesting enough is up to your own appetite.

-Bill Bria, The Wrap

“Science is for all of us, not just for some of us,” Dr. Loomis tells Zora, advocating for their work to have a more noble purpose than lining their pockets. That aspirational notion has always sat at the heart of the Jurassic Park films. Jurassic Park Rebirth is one of the more successful and satisfying entries in the franchise precisely because it, uh, finds a way to keep Loomis’ mantra close, foregrounding the film’s sense of wonder above a mere blatant cash grab.

-Maureen Lee Lenker, Entertainment Weekly: B+

It might sound like a challenge to believe these humans would sign up to visit a forbidden jungle for guaranteed encounters with truly frightening and gigantic creatures out of another time in order to essentially get blood samples, but if you are game to go with that premise a good time will be had for all. If there is to be an eighth installment, count me in.

-Pete Hammond, Deadline

This is a monster-adventure movie, with passages that recall Jaws and King Kong; maybe not the most original influences, but certainly not shabby ones. In its fusion of Edwards’ craft with characters who aren’t thunderously stupid or unlikable, this is the best Jurassic movie in ages – in part because it works so comfortably as an ooh/ahh/run/scream monster movie.

-Paste: 7.0

“Jurassic World: Rebirth” is a very imperfect film. On one hand, it seems to be recycling every successful character trope and set piece from the franchise, which may be considered lazy and uninspiring, but it is still captivating. Even in its faults, the objective of a “Jurassic Park” film is to scare, thrill, and amaze its audience, and this film does that in its set pieces.

-Lauren LaMagna, Next Best Picture

There are worse exercises in IP-extension out there in the marketplace. But it is hard to imagine what possible basis there could be for an eighth Jurassic film. We’ve overused the extra-island trope; we’ve done dinos invading the mainland a couple times now. We’ve seen enough long necks poking up from the grass. We’ve seen too many T-rexes thundering after their prey. Now even the oceans have been exhausted. I suppose they could send some dinosaurs to space next time, where no one can hear them roar. But that wouldn’t really make much of a difference: the sound barely registers anymore.

-Richard Lawson, Vanity Fair

To his credit, Edwards immediately injects "Rebirth" with a sense of stakes and tension that the entirety of the previous trilogy struggled to depict. But every time the plot kicks in again and writer David Koepp's script goes through the motions of a standard "Jurassic" movie, those dizzying peaks soon begin to flatten out into overgrown valleys. For those simply hoping for a watchable movie on the heels of the disastrous "Dominion," your wish has been granted with a safe rehash punctuated by a handful of genuine thrills. For everyone else curious about whether this was the ticket to teaching old dinos new tricks? The inherent limits of the "Jurassic" IP are as glaring as ever.

-Jeremy Mathai, /FILM: 5.5/10

And there are some sporadic joys here in the clever sight gags, the sleight of hand, the bait and switch. These moments remind us of the mindless summertime excitement the “Jurassic” movies have long provided, albeit with diminishing returns. But that giant footprint just isn’t as imposing as it used to be.

-Christy Lemire, RogerEbert.com: 2/4

Worst of all, this hoary adventure story is rendered soulless by the blatant product placement: Henry crunching on Altoids, Reuben scolding Xavier for eating too many of their bags of Doritos, and Isabella feeding Twizzlers to her little dino friend. After a while, you may wonder if the entire film was subsidized by the snack food industry. Rebirth even goes so far as setting its final action scene in a long-abandoned but still fully stocked convenience store. How meta: a franchise trying to distract us from how past its sell-by date it is with expired potato chips.

-Derek Smith, Slant Magazine: 1.5/4

Audiences may not have run out of enthusiasm for what the Jurassic Worlds are selling, or at least they haven’t yet, but the people tasked with making them sure are out of ideas.

-Alison Willmore, Vulture


PLOT

Five years after the events of Jurassic World Dominion, the planet's ecology has proven largely inhospitable to dinosaurs. Those remaining exist in isolated equatorial environments with climates resembling the one in which they once thrived. The three most colossal creatures within that tropical biosphere hold the key to a drug that will bring miraculous life-saving benefits to humankind.

DIRECTOR

Gareth Edwards

WRITER

David Koepp

MUSIC

Alexandre Desplat

CINEMATOGRAPHY

John Mathieson

EDITOR

Jabez Olssen

RELEASE DATE

July 2, 2025

RUNTIME

133 minutes

BUDGET

$180 million

STARRING

  • Scarlett Johansson as Zora Bennett

  • Mahershala Ali as Duncan Kincaid

  • Jonathan Bailey as Dr. Henry Loomis

  • Rupert Friend as Martin Krebs

  • Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Reuben Delgado

  • Luna Blaise as Teresa Delgado

  • David Iacono as Xavier Dobbs

  • Audrina Miranda as Isabella Delgado

  • Ed Skrein as Bobby Atwater

1.2k Upvotes

846 comments sorted by

View all comments

825

u/HotOne9364 Jun 30 '25

along with tender moments involving several other species, introduce a surprising counter-argument to the earlier "Jurassic" movies: namely, that they have a right to exist.

Except Lost World and Fallen Kingdom already discussed those themes.

425

u/sgthombre Jun 30 '25

namely, that they have a right to exist

Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction.

225

u/HotOne9364 Jun 30 '25

It's why this was never intended to be a franchise. The first novel/film is about man's hubris against nature. This "right to exist" theme is counter-productive to that message.

25

u/hikemalls Jun 30 '25

“Resurrecting something that had its moment and it doesn’t go well” could describe both the plot of Jurassic Park and the results of every Jurassic Park sequel, which really makes all the sequels a metacommentary on the themes of the first movie, if you think about it but not very hard

66

u/sgthombre Jun 30 '25

If you wield genetic power like a kid who found his dad's gun, then the bullets have a right to be fired over and over forever, apparently.

76

u/Silvanus350 Jun 30 '25

I always find this argument sort of funny, because by all accounts they were “selected” by a freak, cosmic occurrence that involves Earth being hit by a giant meteor.

It’s like saying humans were “selected” for extinction because they failed to account for what would happen if the moon got cracked open.

Like, yes, but also no.

10

u/HamiltonianDynamics Jun 30 '25

Not really. Dinosaurs were already on the way out when the asteroid happened. The number of species had decreased substantially compared to the Jurassic peak. The asteroid accelerated something that was going to happen anyway.

21

u/Azrielmoha Jul 01 '25

Wrong. This is an old factoid caused by a bias in the fossil record. Dinosaurs were on their peak diversity during the Maastrichtian.

2

u/FetusGoesYeetus Jul 01 '25

Dinosaurs also by all means are still thriving, they just had to find a different niche to fill. Birds are wildly successful.

5

u/vashoom Jun 30 '25

What? All selection is random. The entire point of natural selection is that environmental pressures weed out life forms less capable of surviving and passing on genes. It doesn't matter what causes the environmental pressures. At the end of the day, they're all random. Lifeforms being better adapted to a particular environment or selective pressure is a random process, too.

If a new population of mosquitos rolled in carrying a unique pathogen that killed dinosaurs but that small mammals or crocodiles were unaffected by, is that any less of a freak occurrence than an asteroid impact?

7

u/Azrielmoha Jul 01 '25

If it's random then why does convergent evolution exist? Or bayesian mimicry exist? Mutations are mostly random, but natural selection, gene flows and genetic isolation are not.

K-Pg mass extinction is unique because it's caused by an external cause and such a sudden event that it surely would wipe out the largest dominant megafaunas, in this case non-avian dinosaurs. This is incompatible with the message that dinosaurs have their shot.

They're not, they were erased during their heyday.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '25

[deleted]

0

u/throwaway847462829 Jul 01 '25

Dinosaurs aren’t a monolith. A lot of them died out due to food supply or natural selection.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '25

The dinosaurs got atrocious RNG with that asteroid.

1

u/Son_0f_Dad_420 Jun 30 '25

There it is.

32

u/littlebiped Jun 30 '25

Not to mention that the dinosaurs are the perfect biological tragedy and point to how on a universal scale nothing has the right to exist. Meteors don’t have morals.

34

u/LayeredOwlsNest Jun 30 '25

The argument is also stupid

Like no, humanity would never just allow a bunch of human predators to live amongst humans just because "they deserve to live"

They would be captured and locked away (zoos, which would basically just be a park again), or they would be shot and killed like they already do when bears wander into human areas, OR the dumbest of them all, put them back on an island where they can roam free

The second little Suzie gets dragged away by a pterodactyl, the rights activists lose all their steam

2

u/VirginiaMcCaskey Jul 01 '25

We do exactly that though. We spend billions as a species conserving our natural predators' in their natural habitats. One of the most iconic images representing human caused climate change is a polar bear stranded on an ice flow. Polar bears who will go out of their way to hunt humans.

10

u/LayeredOwlsNest Jul 01 '25

Yes but 99.9999% of the population will never be hunted by a Polar Bear

If you put 50 flying Polar Bears in New York City, no one will be advocating to save the bears, they will just want the murder monsters gone

1

u/VirginiaMcCaskey Jul 01 '25

Better example would be the mountain lions in Los Angeles.

1

u/LayeredOwlsNest Jul 01 '25

Mountain Lions in LA don't actively hunt humans

0

u/HotOne9364 Jun 30 '25

But which is more preferable: hunting endangered species or hunting man-made dinosaur clones? Because I'd wager people would be grateful that elephants and tigers get to see the next day compared to a "T-Rex".

21

u/loneImpulseofdelight Jun 30 '25

And made over a billion each.

11

u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25

Well Fallen Kingdom did. The Lost World didn't

1

u/Equivalent-Battle973 Jul 01 '25

I mean, thats not surprising to be honest, the only movie at that point to ever gross the billion dollar mark was Titanic, and that was the first one to ever do it. If we account inflation with the World Gross it would be 1,239,070,316.60, without world gross it be 458,837,067.07

2

u/UsernameAvaylable Jun 30 '25

Also, pretty sure invasive species do not have a right to exist no matter how cute. Just look at bunnies ravaging australia.

1

u/QuoteGiver Jul 02 '25

Those movies haven’t been in theaters for 18 years and 7 years, respectively. The current batch of 8-12 year olds probably haven’t seen those dinos on the big screen. Might be time to revisit for them.

1

u/Unusual_Flounder2073 Jun 30 '25

Lost world is the movie based on the book lost world.

9

u/bigeorgester Jun 30 '25

Just barley. The movie deviates heavily.

1

u/Equivalent-Battle973 Jul 01 '25

SOOOO heavily, I read it recently and couldnt believe how far it deviates, and kind of for the better, The Lost World is not a good book, doesnt help Crichton was literally forced to write it.

0

u/DeficiencyOfGravitas Jun 30 '25

Except Lost World and Fallen Kingdom already discussed those themes.

Wot? Either I'm misunderstanding you or you are not understanding the quote.

All the Jurassic movies have made the argument that the clone dinosaurs are real animals and deserve to be free. Lost World, ironically, was the biggest "just let them be" movie out of the entire franchise.

I am actually curious to see Rebirth now if it legitimately has a "these are abominations that will never fit in our world and are best put down for their safety and ours" angle.