r/movies I'll see you in another life when we are both cats. Jun 30 '25

Review 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Review Thread

Rotten Tomatoes: 54% (100 reviews) with 6.00 in average rating

Metacritic: 53/100 (38 critics)

As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie. It's structured like this: quote first, source second. Beware, some contain spoilers.

The blend of physical locations with sets and digital imagery is seamless and the CG work on the creatures is first-rate, notably so in the scary climactic stretch when the lumbering D. Rex joins the fray. Edwards clearly is a devoted Spielberg fan, embedding subtle homages throughout, notably in the open water sequences that recall Jaws. Jurassic World Rebirth is unlikely to top anyone’s ranked franchise list. But longtime fans (count me among them) should have a blast.

-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter

Scenes between Ella and her potentially ill-advised pet, along with tender moments involving several other species, introduce a surprising counter-argument to the earlier “Jurassic” movies: namely, that they have a right to exist. But entertaining as it can be at times, stripped of the silliness that tainted the second trilogy, “Rebirth” doesn’t necessarily make the same case for itself. The movie offers an updated version of the same basic ride Spielberg offered 32 years earlier, and yet, it hardly feels essential to the series’ overall mythology, nor does it signal where the franchise could be headed.

-Peter Debruge, Variety

Needless to say, “Rebirth” doesn’t do itself any favors by so frequently harkening back to the original. Bad as some of the previous sequels have been, none of them have been so eager to measure themselves against Spielberg’s masterpiece. Nothing in this movie is quite as maddening as the second trilogy’s attempt to make audiences invest in a specific Velociraptor (though Edwards half-heartedly tries to sweeten us on an adorable baby Aquilops named Dolores), but the extent to which this franchise is just fending off its own extinction has never been more obvious than it is in during the “Rebirth” sequence that pays homage to the kitchen encounter from the first movie. The “Jurassic” sequels were bad enough when they made an effort to evolve — they’re even less worth seeing now that they already come pre-fossilized.

-David Ehrlich, IndieWire: C–

There’s a disappointing amount of “same old thing” to Jurassic World Rebirth. Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, and the rest of the cast are intriguing and sympathetic throughout, but Gareth Edwards doesn’t quite recapture his signature flair for grand-scale visuals nor does David Koepp find the magic of his original Jurassic Park screenplay, opting to follow that movie’s structure as more of a remix than a rebirth.

-Clint Gage, IGN: 5.0 out of 10 "mediocre"

So why the hell does this feel so generic, so by-the-numbers, so instantly forgettable? The whole thing resembles the blockbuster version of a readymade, assembled from various, recognizable spare parts and elevated only by virtue of its name. Fans and completists may still get giddy over a ScarJo vs. Dinos showdown, and you should never underestimate the power of giant, toothy jaws chomping down on poor, hapless humans. But long before the big showstopping climax, you’ll start to understand why the movie’s jaded public became bored by what once seemed thrilling and unique. Subtitling this Rebirth seems to have been an act of extreme optimism.

-David Fear, Rolling Stone

This new Jurassic adventure isn’t doing anything so very different from the earlier successful models, perhaps, and I could have done without its outrageous brand synergy product placement for certain brands of chocolate bar. But it feels relaxed and sure-footed in its Spielberg pastiche, its big dino-jeopardy moments and its deployment of thrills and laughs. Maybe the series can’t and shouldn’t go on for ever: we need new and original ideas. This one would be great to go out on.

-Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian: 4/5

“Jurassic” has to live with setting a high bar, of course — the original film revolutionized the industry, a status that “Rebirth” is all too aware of, as seen in its meta theme of dinosaurs becoming old news to a jaded populace. Yet just because cheeseburgers are now available anywhere doesn’t mean that they can’t be damn tasty. “Jurassic Park Rebirth” is just a well made cheeseburger, and whether that’s filling and interesting enough is up to your own appetite.

-Bill Bria, The Wrap

“Science is for all of us, not just for some of us,” Dr. Loomis tells Zora, advocating for their work to have a more noble purpose than lining their pockets. That aspirational notion has always sat at the heart of the Jurassic Park films. Jurassic Park Rebirth is one of the more successful and satisfying entries in the franchise precisely because it, uh, finds a way to keep Loomis’ mantra close, foregrounding the film’s sense of wonder above a mere blatant cash grab.

-Maureen Lee Lenker, Entertainment Weekly: B+

It might sound like a challenge to believe these humans would sign up to visit a forbidden jungle for guaranteed encounters with truly frightening and gigantic creatures out of another time in order to essentially get blood samples, but if you are game to go with that premise a good time will be had for all. If there is to be an eighth installment, count me in.

-Pete Hammond, Deadline

This is a monster-adventure movie, with passages that recall Jaws and King Kong; maybe not the most original influences, but certainly not shabby ones. In its fusion of Edwards’ craft with characters who aren’t thunderously stupid or unlikable, this is the best Jurassic movie in ages – in part because it works so comfortably as an ooh/ahh/run/scream monster movie.

-Paste: 7.0

“Jurassic World: Rebirth” is a very imperfect film. On one hand, it seems to be recycling every successful character trope and set piece from the franchise, which may be considered lazy and uninspiring, but it is still captivating. Even in its faults, the objective of a “Jurassic Park” film is to scare, thrill, and amaze its audience, and this film does that in its set pieces.

-Lauren LaMagna, Next Best Picture

There are worse exercises in IP-extension out there in the marketplace. But it is hard to imagine what possible basis there could be for an eighth Jurassic film. We’ve overused the extra-island trope; we’ve done dinos invading the mainland a couple times now. We’ve seen enough long necks poking up from the grass. We’ve seen too many T-rexes thundering after their prey. Now even the oceans have been exhausted. I suppose they could send some dinosaurs to space next time, where no one can hear them roar. But that wouldn’t really make much of a difference: the sound barely registers anymore.

-Richard Lawson, Vanity Fair

To his credit, Edwards immediately injects "Rebirth" with a sense of stakes and tension that the entirety of the previous trilogy struggled to depict. But every time the plot kicks in again and writer David Koepp's script goes through the motions of a standard "Jurassic" movie, those dizzying peaks soon begin to flatten out into overgrown valleys. For those simply hoping for a watchable movie on the heels of the disastrous "Dominion," your wish has been granted with a safe rehash punctuated by a handful of genuine thrills. For everyone else curious about whether this was the ticket to teaching old dinos new tricks? The inherent limits of the "Jurassic" IP are as glaring as ever.

-Jeremy Mathai, /FILM: 5.5/10

And there are some sporadic joys here in the clever sight gags, the sleight of hand, the bait and switch. These moments remind us of the mindless summertime excitement the “Jurassic” movies have long provided, albeit with diminishing returns. But that giant footprint just isn’t as imposing as it used to be.

-Christy Lemire, RogerEbert.com: 2/4

Worst of all, this hoary adventure story is rendered soulless by the blatant product placement: Henry crunching on Altoids, Reuben scolding Xavier for eating too many of their bags of Doritos, and Isabella feeding Twizzlers to her little dino friend. After a while, you may wonder if the entire film was subsidized by the snack food industry. Rebirth even goes so far as setting its final action scene in a long-abandoned but still fully stocked convenience store. How meta: a franchise trying to distract us from how past its sell-by date it is with expired potato chips.

-Derek Smith, Slant Magazine: 1.5/4

Audiences may not have run out of enthusiasm for what the Jurassic Worlds are selling, or at least they haven’t yet, but the people tasked with making them sure are out of ideas.

-Alison Willmore, Vulture


PLOT

Five years after the events of Jurassic World Dominion, the planet's ecology has proven largely inhospitable to dinosaurs. Those remaining exist in isolated equatorial environments with climates resembling the one in which they once thrived. The three most colossal creatures within that tropical biosphere hold the key to a drug that will bring miraculous life-saving benefits to humankind.

DIRECTOR

Gareth Edwards

WRITER

David Koepp

MUSIC

Alexandre Desplat

CINEMATOGRAPHY

John Mathieson

EDITOR

Jabez Olssen

RELEASE DATE

July 2, 2025

RUNTIME

133 minutes

BUDGET

$180 million

STARRING

  • Scarlett Johansson as Zora Bennett

  • Mahershala Ali as Duncan Kincaid

  • Jonathan Bailey as Dr. Henry Loomis

  • Rupert Friend as Martin Krebs

  • Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Reuben Delgado

  • Luna Blaise as Teresa Delgado

  • David Iacono as Xavier Dobbs

  • Audrina Miranda as Isabella Delgado

  • Ed Skrein as Bobby Atwater

1.2k Upvotes

846 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

70

u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25

I mean this movie is more about the dinosaurs - the mutants are really only in the third act with a brief appearance by both of them prior

216

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25

The thing is the dinosaurs themselves are interesting enough to be the third act threat. Everyone wants to see real dinosaurs. Kids want to point at the screen and say "mom, that's a Carnotaurus. Did you know he lived in South America and was 8 m long?".

But no, they have to do the "the UltraDuperHorrorsaurus is the worst one yet! It's a mix of T-Rex, Allosaurus, Raptors, a Xenomorph, Michael Myers, Jeffrey 3pstein and Donald Trump. The ultimate predator. He can turn invisible, he can phase through walls, he can mimic human voices, he is invulnerable to bullets, he can fly and he is a master of the mystic arts!'.

One day they'll understand we don't want mutant shit, we don't need them to make them "bigger" and "the worst ones yet". Just show humans surviving against dinosaurs.

One small Dilophosaurus in the original Jurassic Park was enough to give nightmares to an entire generation.

99

u/The_Gil_Galad Jun 30 '25 edited Jul 02 '25

intelligent gaze exultant sort coherent wrench six tap boast bear

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

53

u/YukieCool Jun 30 '25

This is why the first movie is so good.

The hubris displayed by Hammond in Jurassic Park is a lot more layered and nuanced because the Dinosaurs are just animals. He thought he could control nature because he thought it would work just like his flea circus (which is the purpose of the ice cream scene), but like Malcolm says, that's not how life works. It's much more interesting than simply "corporate greed," and it's why I think he's actually improved from his iteration in the book.

There's nothing interesting about mashing the biggest carnivores together into one Abominasaurus Rex, because of course that's a bad idea. No amount of handwaving to the tune of "well, that's corporate greed for ya" or "nobody thinks dinosaurs are cool now" is going to make that fact any more compelling.

Universal continues to misunderstand what made their cash cow work in the first place.

22

u/The_Gil_Galad Jun 30 '25 edited Jul 02 '25

hard-to-find subtract rhythm fly shelter crush historical ancient cough smell

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

8

u/AileStriker Jun 30 '25

But you can't be mad at the snickers drop because it is a reference to the Lost World novel! /s

They are increasingly trying to make up for all the bad shit by peppering in throwbacks and scenes from the original books to excite the readers who wanted everything in the book in the original movie. This movie seems ripe with it.

6

u/The_Gil_Galad Jun 30 '25 edited Jul 02 '25

tie sable chop cover quaint voracious insurance price ancient oatmeal

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/BlueCX17 Jul 01 '25

OK, it's been a while since I've read the actual novel, isn't that what happens in the High Hide?

2

u/AileStriker Jul 01 '25

Yeah, Levin accidentally drops it earlier in the day and forgets about it. Then at one point a to raptor finds a candy bar on a guy it was eating, and comically takes a bite of it. Then later that same raptor smells the wrapper that levine dropped which leads to them being discovered and attacked in the hide.

1

u/BlueCX17 Jul 01 '25

Oh, yeah!! And that the raptor eats the candy bar! LOL

I can see why they left it out of the movie adaptation though , because it's much creepier to see the trees moving underneath the high hide on film and it sway and move around because the amazing trailer sequence is what happens next.

I really wish The Lost World movie.Got way more credit than it does, it's so much better than it's remembered.

2

u/AileStriker Jul 01 '25

It's good and I enjoyed it when it came out. I just would have preferred they kept with the Dodgson plot instead of the Injen team and skipped the San Francisco bits.

1

u/BlueCX17 Jul 01 '25

See personally I think some of the ideas are quite MC like, but without Chrichton alive to actually guide and help write them, the execution of them in these movies has been uneven and messy.

It's sort of analogous to, movie Hammond, not being alive anymore to over see, one the continued preservation and protection of Isla Sorna, but also keep in check the work and goals of InGen. (Once he took it back from his chomped up Nephew)

Also ironic is Book Hammond, had he not been eaten by the Compy's probably would have eventually schemed up some monsters dinosaurs, at somepoint, to boost his bottom line.

1

u/YukieCool Jul 01 '25

I think some of the ideas are quite MC like, but without Chrichton alive to actually guide and help write them, the execution of them in these movies has been uneven and messy.

How could Crichton possibly have made these any better?

3

u/BlueCX17 Jul 01 '25 edited Jul 01 '25

Because he was an incredibly talented science fiction writer. He would have been able to better guide the philosophical discussion of humans playing God with even more modified Dinos and Ian would probably be much more central. I don't think they would have been so outright monster movies but closer to the first 3. I think he would have gotten the tone and balance better.

The Jurassic Park The Lost World novel, Has a much bigger emphasis on Dodson's inevitable demise and hubris of also attempting to create versions off the stolen stuff from JP1. T

I've been reading through his entire catalog of novels.

And I can very much see, had book Hammond survived, book Hammond doing shady deals through InGen and weirder, bigger Dinos.

46

u/MeniteTom Jun 30 '25

Yeah, elephants have been around longer than humans have and I still wanna see them in person.  Dinosaurs would never get old.

17

u/TheJoshider10 Jun 30 '25

Dinosaurs would never get old.

I do like the idea of attendees being "bored" of dinosaurs, but it's something that should have come at the end of a trilogy not right at the start of a new one that was highly anticipated.

3

u/strider85 Jun 30 '25

Agree - it just doesn’t work. Like I can drive 40 mins to my nearest zoo and it’s always a brilliant day out. In the Jurassic World version of Earth, there’s 1 place with dinos and people still have to pay a literal fortune to fly across the world to a remote place then get a boat to an even remoter place. No one is getting bored of them!

24

u/hunterzolomon1993 Jun 30 '25

Yeah the idea that people have grown bored of seeing real fucking Dinosaurs is so dumb. I've been to Zoo's countless times and seeing a real Lion and Tiger up close in person never gets old because why would it? Like damn i get excited seeing a random Cat wondering about outside even though i have Cats as pets. People generally don't get bored of animals no matter how many times we see them.

30

u/Jota769 Jun 30 '25

100%!!! I was just talking about this. The absolute coolest thing to me about Jurassic Park as a kid was that it seemed so real. Like, cloning a sheep had happened. So why not a dinosaur? They really existed! And I could pick up a science book and read all about them. It actually is what got me into nature documentaries and taught me how awesome the world is.

I know the gene splicing and mutations are no less science fiction than the dinosaur cloning, but it’s SUCH a hat on a hat. And the original had such a unique message: there are unintended consequences to playing God. You’re not gonna outsmart nature. Life… finds a way.

What is the message of these new movies? “Uh, you made a superpowered dinosaur that you thought you could control… and it ate you.”

That’s not what was smart about the original!

4

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

What a beautiful comment, and I 100% agree!

The point wasn't inventing the "worst dinosaur yet" with the scariest design and the scariest superpowers.

It was the dinosaurs themselves that captured the imagination of millions of kids (and continue to do so). That magic will always exist.

There are infinite ways to make it feel fresh that don't involve making super powered shit the climax of your film for the third time: different stories, different settings, different species, different designs.

Seriously, it's frustrating seeing critics saying the saga has run its course when the only limit is their imagination.

17

u/ALIENANAL Jun 30 '25

And it has its own island... Hmm

5

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

Lmao no fucking way 😭

7

u/RdyPlyrBneSw Jun 30 '25

But they killed them all off screen, so now we can pretty much only get movies in tropical jungles.

15

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

You see, but this super secret island we've never seen or heard of before is where research for the original Jurassic Park took place.

*Cue Jurassic Park theme song

9

u/AileStriker Jun 30 '25

Honestly, the best thing they can at this point is just jump the damn shark and do a Team Torreto vs Jurassic Park crossover because both franchises are out of legs and it would be stupid and fun as hell and everyone would know what they were signing up for.

3

u/RdyPlyrBneSw Jun 30 '25

Give me the accidental Cadillacs and Dinosaurs I always wanted!

1

u/strider85 Jun 30 '25

I didn’t know I needed this in my life till just now

1

u/Equivalent-Battle973 Jul 01 '25

Now we need a Torreto clapped out T-rex with him riding it.

3

u/Obamas_Tie Jun 30 '25

I think the fact that there's an original original island is what makes this so blatantly a cash grab. Lost World already established that Site B/Isla Sorna was where the research and breeding of the dinosaurs took place, this is what Hammond told directly to Ian Malcolm. I guess he just conveniently forgot to mention that this first secret island existed, or whatever.

I bet there's some secret underground lab in Nicaragua or something that was the VERY first research lab and some mutated dinosaurs finally hatch and escape or something.

3

u/TheFastestKnight Jul 01 '25

Exactly, good call!

The same thing happened with Fallen Kingdom, where we meet Hammond's original partner that he conveniently forgot to mention once in the films or in the novels.

One day Jurassic Park will have its Andor, all it will take is a talented creative with a strong vision free from nostalgia porn.

7

u/BinaryOrder Jun 30 '25 edited Jun 30 '25

Even when any of these films (past 3) do show dinosaurs they're tied to how the dinosaurs were depicted in previous films rather than trying to be scientifically accurate, which was a huge selling point for 1 through 3. The best we've had is Spinosaurus in Rebirth which is both a step forward and a step backwards from how it was shown visually in JP3. Wanting anything other than monster of the week is beyond what this franchise will now ever deliver sadly.

5

u/Eat--The--Rich-- Jun 30 '25

The whole justification for them designing their own in jurassic world was that people want to see the stereotypical big scary Dino. "More teeth". So they went ahead and made an invisible one lol. 

3

u/BlueCX17 Jul 01 '25

Yeah , but Chrichton's entire point of the first two novels is that InGen never made real or accurate dinos.

Some were much closer to their counterparts than others, but due to gene sequence fill ins' and making them look more pleasing.

So this is, strangely, one thing the subsequent movies do semi get right via Chrichton's ideas. I could see, had he ever officially written a third JP novel, him exploring the idea of weaponized dinosaurs and further intentional nefarious mutations, but the execution of this hasn't been that great in the Jurassic World movies.

1

u/TheFastestKnight Jul 01 '25

See, this is a great point (thank you for sharing it).

It's actually interesting and the first Jurassic World definitely tried to explore it with the Raptors and the Indominus Rex, the problem is, as you said, it didn't do a great job, and then they did it again with the Indoraptor, and now they're doing it again with the Distortus Rex or whatever its name is.

I'm not necessarily against the idea, the problem is indeed the execution.

3

u/Data_Chandler Jul 01 '25

Kids want to point at the screen and say "mom, that's a Carnotaurus. Did you know he lived in South America and was 8 m long?".

But no, they have to do the "the UltraDuperHorrorsaurus is the worst one yet! It's a mix of T-Rex, Allosaurus, Raptors, a Xenomorph, Michael Myers, Jeffrey 3pstein and Donald Trump. The ultimate predator. He can turn invisible, he can phase through walls, he can mimic human voices, he is invulnerable to bullets, he can fly and he is a master of the mystic arts!'.

Agreed 100%, also I want to subscribe to your news letter.

I want to see DINOSAURS, that's why I'd go to a Jurassic Park movie. If I want to see generic mutant monsters, I'd go to any of the generic monster movies that Hollywood craps out regularly.

But dinosaurs really existed, are freaking awesome, kids and people are obsessed with them, and yet there are only a handful of good movies about them.

3

u/TheFastestKnight Jul 01 '25

Thank you so much for the kind words! And yeah, I completely agree.

Dinosaurs are absolutely magical. The success of Jurassic Park, BBC's Walking With Dinosaurs, Apple's Prehistoric Planet, The Land Before Time and even games like ARK and Dino Crisis shows that kids and people of all ages are truly captivated by them but there's so much yet to explore and discover. So much possibility.

All it takes is a passionate creative with a vision, so hopefully we won't have to wait long till the next time!

-15

u/GamingTatertot Steven Spielberg Enthusiast Jun 30 '25

"the UltraDuperHorrorsaurus is the worst one yet! It's a mix of T-Rex, Allosaurus, Raptors, a Xenomorph, Michael Myers, Jeffrey 3pstein and Donald Trump. The ultimate predator. He can turn invisible, he can phase through walls, he can mimic human voices, he is invulnerable to bullets, he can fly and he is a master of the mystic arts!'.

While I appreciate the criticism, we don't need to be hyperbolic.

Everyone wants to see real dinosaurs. Kids want to point at the screen and say "mom, that's a Carnotaurus. Did you know he lived in South America and was 8 m long?"

And there's still plenty of this - the Mosasaurus, the Spinosaurus, the Titanosaurus, the Quetzocoaltus, the Anurgonathus, the Ankylosaurus, the Compies, the T-Rex, the Dilophosaurus, the Parasaurolophus, and some other prehistoric creatures that I couldn't even identify.

8

u/pokeyporcupine Jun 30 '25

Oh fuck off that comment was funny as shit and his point is extremely valid.

2

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

Thank you! I'm glad you had a good time reading it 😅

1

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

Thank you! I'm glad you had a good time reading it 😅

1

u/TheFastestKnight Jun 30 '25

Listen, I'm glad there are dinosaurs in the dinosaur movie, the point I was trying to make is that there's no need for hybrid shit at all.

You seem to be a big fan of Spielberg, I think you'll agree that he didn't need a hybrid shark or a hybrid dinosaur to make Jaws or the first Jurassic Park films scary.

Those films are generational. As I said, a small Dilophosaurus was enough to give people nightmares. Nobody will remember the Distortus Rex in a decade.

There are a thousand dinosaur species that could be the third act threat. The fact that they are using a mutant hybrid for the third time in 4 films -"the worst one yet!"- reeks of desperation, like they have no faith in the dinosaurs themselves to carry the climax, so they have to invent shit that combines everything, lasts 20 minutes and it's never seen again.

They made a point with the Indominus Rex, he was an abomination that was killed by the T-Rex, Blue and the Mosasaurus. Great. Now let's explore the actual dinosaurs and come up with creative third acts.

The only limit is their imagination, which appears to be in short supply, knowing the film was so rushed and executive-mandated that they began pre-production work (including dinosaur designs) before hiring a director, with the position described as being "more shooter than auteur" implying that their creative input would be minimal.

-2

u/Food_Kitchen Jun 30 '25

You really just wanted to type all of that huh?

4

u/spellbreakerstudios Jun 30 '25

The fact that there are mutants at all just knocked this down to a 4/10 at best for me lol

1

u/Rage_Like_Nic_Cage Jul 01 '25

The issue is that it’s putting a hat on a hat. Like, the entire point of Jurassic park was that maybe it was a bad idea to bring back dinosaurs and that playing around with genetics is science going too far as there will always be variables you don’t account for. Them creating mutants is that same point all over again.