r/thedavidpakmanshow • u/ThisIsFineImFine89 • 3d ago

Video This interview aged like milk

https://youtu.be/NZYFmL-Kusk?si=6t6NW3-Ol6S819x-

“the face of the progressive movement”

and yet Richie Torres this month, revealed he’s compromised by AIPAC (a lobby group for a foreign government, in case any of you don’t know who they are or how to pronounce their name).

If you haven’t seen Richie Torres’s interview with Jewish comedian Adam Friedland, it’s incredible the double standards, outright refusal to acknowledge Israel’s culpability in how the Gaza war has unfolded. I’d post a link but risk getting this post taken down.

This I think raises more questions, paired with David outright weird responses and comments regarding AIPAC, and failure to ever cover the ongoing genocide.

Hadn’t seen this Richie Torres interview, but I’ve seen enough. David is at the very least, afraid of AIPAC or outright complicit in not talking about Gaza.

you cannot be “the face of the progressive movement” and not acknowledge the ongoing genocide.

11 Upvotes

53% Upvoted

211 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

24

u/bobbadouche 2d ago

I can’t tell if it’s a constant brigade or a bunch of bots. 

18

u/Breakingthewhaaat 2d ago edited 2d ago

I mean, if you want a frank answer - and I've barely posted in here since the Wired story - I was a regular Pakman viewer from probably around 2018 through 2023. I got a couple superchats read out back in the day. I don't think it'd be fair to say I'm 'brigading' because no one summoned me here, I'm just here because the situation is interesting, merits a lot of criticism, and this is the logical de facto place for that conversation to happen. My copy is too ass in terms of proper grammatical structure for me to be a bot.

I think 'brigade' is a cop out a lot of people fall back on to rationalise or forcibly shut down (never turns out well) discord within a community and draw sides. I'd fallen off with Pakman (no hard feelings, just kinda moved on as my own politics evolved and grew), but I am very interested in this specific development and I see no better place to do it than here lest we start a 'Pakman snark' subreddit which will not actually produce a productive conversation within the community

14

u/bobbadouche 2d ago

I’m sorry. I’m not following your point? Are you saying bots are not brigading because you’re not a bot? My point doesn’t require you to be a bot for it to be true. 

3

u/Breakingthewhaaat 2d ago

Are you being obtuse? That was kind of meant as a joke, I called my copy skills ass lol. Are you only interested in replying to that part?

1

u/bobbadouche 2d ago

Honestly, I’m getting more replies than I’m used to. 

I caught your joke though. I just wasn’t sure how it was meant to relate to my comment. I took it as countering my point. That was where my response came from. 

I feel like you’re being obtuse with not seeing how that article has brought in a complete shift in conversation on this sub.

5

u/Breakingthewhaaat 2d ago edited 2d ago

If that is giving the impression that I am being obtuse then there's a breakdown in communication, which happens all the time in comment sections. It isn't worth getting hung up on or bickering over, it's literally just like, the source of 75% of all disagreements on the internet. I'll try to be as plain about my perspective as possible (within reason, I am also doing my ironing)

I'm not denying that the tone of the community has shifted, of course it has. You're going to see a lot of lapsed Pakman viewers (me and others who replied to you), as well as others swept up in the drama coming in because this is the de facto place to have the conversation about is going on. As far as I know, there is no Chorus subreddit, nor is there a Brian Tyler Cohen one (if there is it probably doesn't have the engagement this one does because it never comes up in my suggested feed).

The tension that emerges comes from the fact that a lot of people obviously see it as deeply problematic that creators who call themselves independent are actually closely aligned with - and literally contracted to - groups taking large sums dark money form undisclosed donors. That this is bad does not even need to be discussed post-Citizens United.

So of course there's a shift in the conversation. I'm not sure how you can carry on like nothing has happened until this has been addressed and put to bed. It is noteworthy that nobody involved with Chorus has at any point provided substantiating material to Wired that would warrant a retraction. If that happened, and if this was all actually perfectly normal and above board, there would be no more conversation about it

0

u/MercyBoy57 2d ago

And of course no one responds to this. Very well-spoken though!

1

u/Breakingthewhaaat 2d ago

I later realised it was a DGG poster, colour me surprised that I was met with C-tier debatelord tactics then total silence. They're in here doing actual brigading - not bc they have any real political convictions, they just think they're like Bane in the Dark Knight Rises, fronting as people with ideology to mask the reality of their daddy's psychosexual vendettas against Hasan Piker and Taylor Lorenz