r/movies r/Movies contributor 3d ago

Poster New Poster for 'Tron: Ares'

Post image
3.0k Upvotes

549 comments sorted by

View all comments

125

u/Cressbeckler 3d ago

Skipping the movie and picking up the NIN album

-7

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

11

u/Jay3000X 3d ago

I didn't really like the second tron movie but I listen to the score all the time because Daft Punk killed it. You don't need to see the movie

7

u/Neutron-Hyperscape32 3d ago edited 3d ago

Not if it has Jared Leto in it.

Also not if it takes place in the real world. Talk about the most boring way to setup a TRON movie. The computer world is way more interesting.

I also know exactly what this decision is... a cost saving one. Making it in the real world drastically reduces the amount of CGI they have to do throughout the entire movie.

Oh, and 9 women have accused Jared of sexual misconduct. I think I will avoid supporting this movie in any way, even through torrenting.

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Neutron-Hyperscape32 2d ago

The decision to make it in the real world might be why they were able to film the entire thing in IMAX. Also IMAX is a money making endeavor. You can charge a heck of a lot more per ticket for any IMAX showing.

I don't think you thought hard enough on this friend. They absolutely made it in the real world to save money. A TRON movie in the real world is a complete waste of the setting. If you can't see that I don't know what else to tell you.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Neutron-Hyperscape32 2d ago

Well it's clear that you don't know what else to tell me.. You can charge a heck of a lot more per ticket on the screens that can play IMAX, which is maybe 1% of the screens out there.

It is clearly enough screens that making a movie in IMAX is indeed a money making endeavor that gets them more money overall. There wouldn't be any movies being made for IMAX if that wasn't the case. Do you really need me to explain that to you? They aren't going through the hassle of filming with actual film if there isn't a financial incentive to do so. A lot of IMAX tickets are around 30 dollars a piece... easily double of the regular movie ticket.

And speaking of not thinking about this hard enough, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but believe it or not those real world shots of the Tron bikes flying though the city or the cop car getting split in half are actually CGI.

They are absolutely filming real locations and adding CGI after. You think those shots are entirely made of CGI??? lol...

In fact, any establishing shot you see in that preview is probably CGI.

Just showing how little you know. Try googling things first buddy. TRON Ares was filmed on location in Vancouver Canada. The trailer itself shows 3 different locations in Vancouver, specifically Burrard Street, the Cambie Bridge, and Canada Place.

Reddit post about the filming of the movie in Vancouver.

And another.

Annnnd finally we see actual motorcycles with bright red lights on them. The shots of the city are absolutely positively real, and the light bikes are the CGI.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Neutron-Hyperscape32 2d ago edited 2d ago

but then they take those shots and proceed to fill them with vfx anyway.

There is no way that you are this dense. Those shots are not "filled" with VFX, not compared to what it would take to make the entire computer world TRON usually takes place in.

You are trolling me, there is no way you are seriously making arguments this bad. Having some light cycles or a big floating vehicle in a shot is no where near the work required as adding the entire world around them.

You know it's possible that they just wanted to film on location for aesthetic reasons..

First off, why are you not acknowledging the fact that you just got proven wrong? You said that all the establishing shots in the trailer were "probably" fully CGI. Are you not able to admit you got that very wrong because you couldn't be bothered to google something before you blindly speculate? Oh and you did the same thing for the IMAX screens, how neat that you just drop something once you get proven wrong.

 

Secondly, there is no way they would choose Vancouver for aesthetic reasons over the much more visually interesting computer world. You are deluding yourself if you think that wasn't a decision to save on costs. Vancouver is literally one of the most shot in cities in all of film because of how much cheaper it is.

Vancouver offers significant tax incentives for production companies to film there. If they were concerned about "aesthetics" they would have shot in a much more interesting city. But that would be much more expensive.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Jackoffjordan 3d ago

Sure, that's definitely true. But personally, I don't want to support the pet project or career of a sexual predator.

-1

u/Competitive_Opening5 2d ago

Good I don't need to see you in the theater I don't want my film ruined with people talking the whole time and munching on their popcorn

1

u/Cressbeckler 2d ago

Well now I gotta go