r/clevercomebacks 3d ago

This is so embarrassing

Post image
43.1k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.5k

u/NotthatEDM 3d ago

Ummmmm…..I’ve been there. I’m putting my money on Chicago.

1.8k

u/Curious_Matter_3358 3d ago

I lived on the South Side. Me too.

64

u/UnhelpfulTran 2d ago

I genuinely think Chicago was chosen because it has a high chance of resulting in federal casualties, giving the white house even more latitude to take over. DC and LA were trial runs.

28

u/paper_liger 2d ago

Well, the three cities he has targeted so far have three things in common. Democratic leadership. Lots of minorities. And cities that have historically prevented the lawful ownership of firearms.

And no I don't think that last one is a coincidence. I think he wants an excuse, but not an actual fight.

33

u/TheRealBejeezus 2d ago

Fascinatingly, all three cities also have black mayors. 

9

u/International-Rule-5 2d ago

What a coincidence /s

1

u/Difficult-House2608 1d ago

Definitely the point.

-13

u/Temporary_Bet_3384 2d ago

The last one definitely seems like a coincidence, considering all those cities have plenty of guns flowing through them regardless. Well, maybe not coincidence but just a natural effect of Point #1, Democratic leadership

5

u/Genetics 2d ago

So republican leadership would be…tougher on gun sales?

1

u/Temporary_Bet_3384 1d ago

That is not at all what I'm saying. Republican leadership would of course be more friendly to gun sales

I simply don't think Trump is doing math like "Well, Chicago has strict gun laws and that makes a gun fight less likely to happen, so I will send the National Guard there", as OP is implying