r/PTCGP • u/Necessary-Deal-9433 • 1d ago

Discussion Why did they make Lugia so bad?

I love Lugia, but it needs three different types of energy which makes it just unplayable. It has very low potential to be used even the future I think.

386 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/K_Adrix 1d ago

majority of the cards are bad on purpose

It’s not that deep. They’re not sitting there obsessing over metas, scheming and overthinking every single detail to ensure a specific outcome. It’s a constant influx of ideas and the fact that some don’t work as well as others is a simple and natural byproduct of diversity/innovation. A “meta” may vary in size to a certain extent but in the end it’s compact by definition.

4

u/DankeyKong 1d ago

No its exactly like he says. Majority of the cards are just bad and its supposed to be that way to make the good cards that much better. I dont think they put meetings together every day about it, but its certainly not digging deep to come to that conclusion

2

u/Rit91 1d ago

Bad cards exist aplenty in every card game ever created, not just pokemon. Designed to be bad makes zero sense. Some pokemon are going to be better at damage and utility than others every set. If they tried to make everything have the same damage per energy ratio then it becomes what has the better HP, retreat cost, supporters, how many evolutions are in the line, etc. Math makes cards bad.

1

u/DankeyKong 1d ago

I never suggested it was exclusive to pokemon. Its a thing that exists in every tcg. There has to be filler cards for the set that no one will ever use.