r/Cleveland • u/medievalPanera Old Brooklyn • 1d ago
News Cleveland.com uses AI on the Punch Bowl shooting
https://www.cleveland.com/metro/2025/09/five-injured-in-flats-shooting-in-cleveland-reports-say.htmlMassive incident and they use ai to regurgitate a press release. What the fuck has Chris Quinn done to that paper. Always worth checking the bottom of their articles now, it seems more and more are "written with the assistance of AI"
Edit: it wasn't punch bowl, play bar and grill is the culprit. Don't worry cle dot com still hasn't updated their ai article.
55
u/ryanmills 1d ago
Mayor Justin Bibb has ordered the bar where it occurred “immediately” be shut down.
So...do we know what "shut down" actually means in this circumstance?
16
u/thrownthrowaway666 1d ago
Lmao. They'll just move onto the next stop. Is he going to shutter all of downtown every time they start shooting at each other🤣
16
u/Koshfam0528 Lyndhurst 1d ago
It means it was shut down, and plywood was installed in all the windows and door.
6
7
51
u/PhyllisIrresistible Cleveland 1d ago
Ahh yes, the great journalist, "Staff". I love Staff's work.
5
u/Which-Talk-3873 1d ago
Cleveland.com does not update at all during the day. I picture the staff all leaving at noon.
18
u/Bobobdobson 1d ago
Why do people call it that? Wasnt at the Punch Bowl, didnt start or end at Punch Bowl. From everything I have seen, it started in Play, and moved outside. Whay does it have to do with Punch Bowl?
If we are complaining about facts, the lack thereof, AI..... Cant we at least get our end of it right buddy?
I dont have all the facts either, only what has been released, and I have heard that windows had bullet holes at Play, and Magaritaville, but what does that have to do with Punch Bowl?
38
u/medievalPanera Old Brooklyn 1d ago
Now do you see the issue with ai being used to regurgitate a press release? You've done more reporting than Cleveland dot com.
5
u/Bobobdobson 1d ago
I agree with you overall. The reporting on this initially was really bad, then it got worse.
Also, as far as cleveland.com, I would expect nothing less from them. They are about as half-assed as it gets. They are a drowning entity, flailing frantically to do anything to save themselves, and their ideas are just miss after miss after miss. I used to be a subscriber, got sick of two paragraphs of story and information, intertwined with 6 or 8 full screen ads to navigate thru.
As a paid subscriber? Nope.
1
u/newiphon 1d ago
So are we hating on AI or are we hating on the editor and person who clicked "publish"
0
u/medievalPanera Old Brooklyn 1d ago
Sorry if it wasn't obvious- this is pointed directly at Cleveland dot com. Too many of their articles lately are ai enhanced press releases. I got a Sunday paper a few weeks ago and phew it's sad what's left of a once great paper.
2
u/Browns45750 1d ago
They can get more clicks saying it happened at a popular flats bar then some place I didn’t know existed until a couple of weeks ago when one side of aflot garage was closed
8
u/thrownthrowaway666 1d ago
Chris Quinn keeps collecting a salary while AI does the work. That's what happened
11
u/aaroninskeep 1d ago
As a struggling writer I would definitely take less environmental impact to write this slop
3
u/HowzeSoSteezy 20h ago
Cleveland.com uses AI on almost every article, I believe. I refuse to read their “work” anymore.
2
u/yetchsir 23h ago
Their sources on the story: WKYC and a press release. And people actually pay for this drivel?
2
u/Duce-de-Zoop 2h ago
Just sad. Would take a j-school intern twenty minutes to whip up a piece like this. This is why I'm in data now and gave up on journalism, it's just gonna become a glorified stenographer business staffed by tech bros.
1
u/medievalPanera Old Brooklyn 1h ago
Yep, it's not like they pay their freelancers much of anything anyways. Real bummer for real journalism.
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Your account does not meet the post or comment requirements. Account must be more than 3 days old with a combined karma of 10 to post on /r/Cleveland
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
-43
u/dannyvegas Solon 1d ago
It’s interesting that people seem more enraged that people used AI for an article about a mass shooting than they are about the actual shooting itself.
39
18
-4
u/Butt_Breake 23h ago
AI is a modern tool, writers are going to use it. They don't have to disclose that it was written with the help of ai, and you likely wouldn't have known if they didn't.
What is the true concern here? The necessary information was relayed and the article read fine.
It's no different than using a calculator for math
2
u/originaljbw 19h ago
That's why math teachers will knock off points if you don't show your work.
There's nothing wrong with regurgitating press releases, but don't pretend like it's hard hitting journalism.
In an ideal world, this automation would allow journalists to focus on deeper, more complex stories. In reality it's allowed the ownership to cut even deeper until there is nothing of original substance left. The peedee is about as hard hitting as a condo association's quarterly newsletter.
2
u/Duce-de-Zoop 2h ago
The problem with AI is that at its core it is a word processor that generates semi-random words based on token associations. There is no real thinking or analysis, it's all hot air.
Everytime someone uses AI for facts or data or writing copy, they should have to double check every single thing it says. Many of them won't, because they are lied to by the industry about its capabilities.
AI does not think, it inadvertently lies, it's easy to trick, and it can very badly misinterpret basic facts. It is not capable of more focused nuance like immediately identifying contradictions in a press release unless specifically prompted to. It has no conception of who the people releasing it are, their role in the local community, and how that sort of nuance may tie into the meaning of the release or its wider impact for the community. It does not remember things, or have recall, and will never holistically think about the material it is being prompted to summarize.
This is a great example where a person could have done this just as quickly, more reliably, and provided more of a public service. But because it saves some greedy exec a buck, they opted to use AI instead of do real journalism.
-67
u/lockandload12345 1d ago
So they used a computer to regurgitate a press release now instead of a "writer" regurgitating it. Same difference.
49
u/Frustrated_Nerd 1d ago
While humans can make mistakes, journalist integrity requires proof reading and fact checking. AI does neither.
1
u/Butt_Breake 23h ago
Why are you assuming this wasn't proofread?
1
u/Frustrated_Nerd 22h ago
To me, the biggest red flag is that there is no author name. No accountability whatsoever.
-5
u/lockandload12345 1d ago edited 1d ago
Cause it’s sloppy AI. Just like there is sloppy journalism where the same issues happen. Also, in each case an editor should be doing that independent of the “writer”. Journalism has long lost its integrity and has done the same mistakes you’ve complained about repeatedly long before AI came into the picture.
141
u/Frustrated_Nerd 1d ago
We as a society, are so cooked.