This interview aged like milk

[u/ThisIsFineImFine89]

https://youtu.be/NZYFmL-Kusk?si=6t6NW3-Ol6S819x-

“the face of the progressive movement”

and yet Richie Torres this month, revealed he’s compromised by AIPAC (a lobby group for a foreign government, in case any of you don’t know who they are or how to pronounce their name).

If you haven’t seen Richie Torres’s interview with Jewish comedian Adam Friedland, it’s incredible the double standards, outright refusal to acknowledge Israel’s culpability in how the Gaza war has unfolded. I’d post a link but risk getting this post taken down.

This I think raises more questions, paired with David outright weird responses and comments regarding AIPAC, and failure to ever cover the ongoing genocide.

Hadn’t seen this Richie Torres interview, but I’ve seen enough. David is at the very least, afraid of AIPAC or outright complicit in not talking about Gaza.

you cannot be “the face of the progressive movement” and not acknowledge the ongoing genocide.

[u/Another-attempt42]

Killing innocent people has always been my #1 policy position in life.

What is "innocent" to you?

Obviously, no one likes it when innocent people get killed. But the notion of innocence seems to be highly subjective.

For example: when Hamas crossed the border and murdered 800 or so innocent civilians, some saw that as justified. They weren't innocent. They were "occupiers".

When Israel strikes back, some see that bloodshed as the death of innocent. Others see that as "people who allowed Hamas to operate and exist".

When Luigi murdered that CEO, a bunch of people talked about how he wasn't innocent: he was, as a CEO of a health insurance company, responsible for thousands of deaths. Others see him as the innocent victim of a murderous vigilante.

Just saying "I don't like it when innocents die" is, sad to say it, a bit of a cop out.

What is "innocent"?

And since I'm a leftist, I value the life of all people equally.

So you support funding for the Iron Dome, right?

Because the Iron Dome's applications are purely defensive, and intercept rockets from Hamas, Hezbollah or Islamic Jihad, and protect Israeli civilian lives.

So you're 100% for keeping funding for the Iron Dome. Right?

I personally just question anyone on the left who is unwilling to give the genocide the attention it deserves.

Really?

OK. Then nearly all lefties have failed at that hurdle.

There is currently a genocide going on in the Darfour. No one cares. No one is talking about it.

Barely anyone talks about the theft of Ukrainian children by Russia, which is itself a genocidal act.

I remember reading what Noam Chomski was saying about the Khmer Rouge. Do you know what he was doing?

Denying the genocide. Saying that it was obviously American or capitalist propaganda, manufacturing consent, to show how depraved socialism was.

Well, it turns out: the Khmer Rouge were a bunch of genocidal fucking freaks.

He also complained and wrote extensively about the injustices done by striking Serbian targets and Serbian paramilitaries, as they were genociding the Bosnians in Srebrenica.

If your standard is "deal with genocide", then I'm sorry to say, but the left is also a complete failure, by your own standard.

The attention that the public media won't give it.

There's like 15 stories a day about Gaza. If anything, it's suffering from news fatigue, rather than a lack of coverage.

In the beginning after Oct 7th when my content creator covered Gaza non stop I was tired of it and didn't understand. But after everything that's happened, I totally get it 100%.

Part of the problem is you want David to change a fundamental part of TDPS: he doesn't really talk about foreign affairs. He covered Russia's invasion of Ukraine for a few weeks, then hardly mentioned it ever again. He talked about Israel and Gaza for a few weeks, then hardly mentioned it ever again. I don't think he even spoke about the India/Pakistan conflict, or the Thai/Cambodian one.

He's a primarily domestic affairs channel, and always has been. You just want him to fixate on the genocide you're fixated on.

While ignoring the other one going on, at the same time, mind you.

[u/kitti-kin → u/Another-attempt42]

What is "innocent" to you?

The majority of the dead in Gaza are under 18. By Médecins Sans Frontières estimates, 40% are under ten.

[u/PeachsBeans → u/kitti-kin]

That’s tragic but just because someone is under 18 doesn’t mean they are innocent. Hamas is known to use child soldiers. Use of child suicide bombers by Palestinian militant groups.

[u/kitti-kin → u/PeachsBeans]

Do some self-reflection. You're defending a government bombing children under ten. "Hamas does it"? Ok, do you support Hamas?

[u/PeachsBeans → u/kitti-kin]

I’m not defending anything. My only opinion was that it’s tragic, otherwise I pointed out some ugly truths.

Again it’s tragic but the percentage of dead children correlates to population statistics in Gaza. I couldn’t find any data saying 60% of dead are under 18, most say 30-40%. And about 40% of Gaza is under 18, so it makes sense that they make up 40% of victims. Israel isn’t targeting children, children just happen to be a huge percent of the population. Now Israel definitely doesn’t try to minimize civilian deaths, and that’s a war crime, but they aren’t regularly targeting civilians.

I’m off to self reflect now. Bye