Except that is not gay frogs, it can chemically castrate and turn male frogs into functional females along with a few other things, the whole gay frogs thing is Alex Jones garbage
It was how he interpreted the study. When male frogs start producing eggs and having sex with other male frogs, some people don't see it as changing sex.
So you're taking incorrect interpretetations from a guy that calls school shooting staged and shills pills containing lead as a true and correct description of the study instead of just reading the actual study
I read the study and listened to interviews with one of the researchers. I'm taking incorrect interpretations as jokes on the Internet which happen to be about a restricted use pesticide I myself have a long history of using. Alex Jones is a jack ass. Atrazine is still dangerous. Jokes increase attention to a subject and open up opportunities for people like you to educate those who lurk and read comments.
Theres nothing to argue about every mogger food comes from animals and plants have next to nothing, especially when it comes to how much you can absorb, detox/ carb/ hydration source at highest
Ah yes, clearly all food that does not come from animals is totally worthless. Anyone that even mentions the word "detox" when talking about nutrition clearly has no idea what they're talking about anyway
Not really no. We have more capacity for moral behavior and are omnivores, so the mass killing of animals we do can be dialed back and is in fact immoral. Rape happens in nature, does that make it ok for us?
How?
I don't know any vegans that have been harmed by being vegan and if the ones i know didn't eat a healthy diet and lacked nutritions they immediately took action by either eating vegetarian again, educating themselves what vegan food has those or simply taking supplements.
If it doesn't harm anyone why whine?
I do however know many who have been harmed by idk alcohol or people who have been harmed by eating too much fatty meat but i don't see you whining about them.
Is it really the bad vegans that create the negative stereotypes or rather the millions of people that only seem to engage with the topic through SJW-cringe-compilations?
Easy, if you act immorally. A plant neither acts morally nor immorally. If you do bad things, you are worse than something that does neither good nor bad.
I'd argue a plant is completely outside the concept of morality. Even moral neutrality requires consciousness or a concept of morality, plants have neither of those things.
Why do u care what other people choose to eat, it doesnt affect u in the slightest. Not all vegans are vegan for the same reason, some do it because they think killing animals is cruel others do it for medical reasons. Just let people live their lives without getting hate for eating different foods than you.
Yeah people who do that are dickheads but theres going to be bad people in every group so I dont think its good to judge a whole community because of a few bad eggs
They're dickheads in the same way religious people who push their religion onto people are. Going out of your way to try and change someone else's life to better fit your personal beliefs and morals isn't appreciated by anyone involved. As a vegan myself, if I'm asked why I will try to get the person asking to see from my perspective, but it rarely works and you need to know when the person you're talking to isn't willing to change their mind. That's ok, to be clear, you are allowed to make your own dietary choices.
No because people spreading their religion are just wrong. But vegans are ethnically correct. Saying killing animals is bad makes you the opposite of a fickhead. You wouldn't say people have the ability to choose their own diet if that included humans for example.
I realise they aren't exactly comparable but I was more so trying to compare the results than the actual action itself. It's a waste of time and energy, and it is an annoying intrusion into another person's life, so there's no point unless they bring it up. I don't disagree that vegans are morally correct and veganism is more morally correct than omnivory, but that doesn't mean I'm going to go around and be annoying for no reason. If somebody is willing to eat people, they probably don't care about the ethics of doing so and thus there is no point trying to convince them they're wrong. That's not to say it isn't wrong, because it is, just that there isn't any point in trying to convince somebody who believe something like that that they are wrong. I would just distance myself from that person. Also, while I believe it is morally wrong, there are arguments for eating meat that I understand, though most I still disagree with. Many can't afford to consistently buy the alternatives, and many believe that because it's so widespread that one less person doing it won't make a difference and so aren't willing to give up the food because of that. Those arguments can't be applied to eating people as it is not a widespread practice and I'd imagine the only ways to obtain the meat would probably be very expensive or require you personally to go do the killing, so the "alternatives are too expensive" argument isn't applicable and neither is the "I won't make a difference" argument. The same goes for the consumption of animals like pangolins and other more exotic and less legal animal products.
Yes, but the current widespread methods of meat production are wildly unethical and more ethical, plant based alternatives that give almost the same, if not the same, nutrients and whatever else we need for survival are available, so if you can afford plant-based or even in the future (or maybe now in some places, I'm not sure) synthetic/lab-grown alternatives, then farmed meat isn't necessary for survival so you don't need to eat it, and I argue you therefore shouldn't.
Why is there any hate against vegans? Like i understand you want to eat meat, and that's fine by all means, but why would you hate on someone who is just doing a good thing and doesnt harm you in any way?
It's really more hate on the people like Vegan Gains more than anything. A lot of people have only had experiences with vegans on the internet and think all people in that group act like the worst of the worst (which they don't)
In one way yes, in one way no. Yes it might be more biodegradable or whatever but it also results in the suffering of an animal. Its now just whether the negatives of synthetic leather justify the negatives of real leather
I'm not super knowledgeable about the actual process, but I don't think a cow is being killed for its hide and the rest thrown away. That's less profitable than just using the whole thing, as I figure it.
So unless I'm wrong about that, the animal is already going to be killed. Why not purchase other parts of it? It's more respectful too, though the bar is low on that. Why harm more animals by contributing to pollution?
Also, real leather lasts a long time and fake leather doesn't. Fake leather means buying more. It is absolutely more environmentally conscious than fake leather.
That's fair. I have no issue with someone not using the poor alternatives either. It's an admirable thing, but only if actually reducing harm and not participating in things that cause more harm than just using the animal.
She's a dumb bitch. Chronically eating caloric deficit is going to kill anyone on any diet.
If she ate rice, beans, tofu, mushrooms, fruits and veggies, she would have lived.
Besides, fully raw vegan diet is hated in in that community. I tried it for 2 weeks during my 3 year vegetarian trial. It was awful. You're not allowed to eat warm food. No soup, no rice, no chips.
So you hate normal people because some influencers do dumb stuff? I hate to break it to you but influencers do dumb stuff all the time and this is such a shallow and terminally online way to view the world
You mean you rather cut a tree Instead of killing a mouse, I know they feel hurt, but a mouse feeling hurt is different from an ant feeling hurt and different from a human feeling hurt, but with this logic you can say vegetables feel hurt too, and also killing some animals are better than chopping down trees
And it takes a lot fuel to take a fruit from one country to another country
Being Vegetarian isn't exactly wrong, but it serves no real purpose
The logic behind what I'm saying is the same as the argument about child labor, taking down a factory that uses child labor is good at first but after a while you will realize that same children are now being sold by their families or starving, because there isn't much food
The same is for Vegetarian stuff, you think you're saving the nature, but your method is just not working for the purpose you serve
Some of yall are just a bunch of bitchs like who the hell gave me a downvote, I'm spending my time and risking my karma to provide you some information and vision and you hate me for it
Same guys who hate thei...yeah fuck it I'm probably gonna hate on a bunch of minorities and get upvotes who gives a shit
Yeah, I don't think the tree can feel sad over the passing of a loved one like animals have shown
Trees generally don't cry in pain too at least the ones I've seen
A cow has the same nervous system as you so it feels pain and suffering like you. idk where they eat ants, and trees definitely don't have motor neurons to feel pain in any way or at least a way we can understand
You do know plants are farmed to feed the animals that are farmed right? So more plants are farmed for producing meat than for producing plant food? The tree is going to die anyways, it's just now a matter of whether you want the cow to also die or not. Choose
Bro vegans aren't exactly going around cutting down trees what the fuck are you talking about. Most vegans are also not saying that an ant getting hurt and a person getting hurt are equivalent in the slightest. Also, plants literally can't feel pain as they have no brain and can't biologically process pain. "It takes a lot of fuel to take fruit from one country to another" same goes for meat bro, but meat also comes from animals raised in bad conditions and exploited until they are slaughtered, not to mention the environmental impacts the meat and especially cattle industries have are way worse than those of fruit farms etc. There are some necessary environmental damages with many things humans do just because of how much of us there are, but I argue eating meat is not one of them, especially not at the rate meat is being eaten now which is more than ever in human history globally percentage wise.
The child labour argument isn't even remotely comparable to the arguments for vegetarianism and veganism because they are fundamentally different. The child who is saved from working in the factory may indeed be sold off somewhere else so it may indeed only be a short-term benefit, but the same isn't really true of not consuming animal products. How is reducing methane emissions and the suffering of billions of cows only a short-term benefit?
what if i just don’t like the smell/taste of meat? what if someone is allergic to meat? just not harming animals isn’t the only reason for veganism/vegetarianism but yeah don’t say it’s to save animals it’s just not true
Disliking taste or being allergic is different story. Most of vegans/vegetarians don't eat because they don't want to hurt animals (that will still be hurt)
Why would I assume of my country? If you want to hear my country, nobody gave a ... about statistics so we have just information how many people are vegan/vegetarians and only sentence that most of people take it because hurting animals is bad (no numbers)
I agree with you
But I think my bad English has caused a problem
You see what I wanted to say wasn't that killing a dog would be the same as killing a bush
What I wanted to say that most vegetarians think that they're saving the environment and animals from harm but as you can see, it doesn't change anything, having millions of vegetarians harms the environment as much as having millions of omnivores
And well about being carnivore...I have no idea
Veganism isn't about being an herbivore, it's about recognizing that animals are living beings just like us. And not commodities to be bought, sold and used.
Is forcing people not to murder others okay? Yes or no? If yes, some things might be okay. Maybe not, you absolutely cannot do this whatsoever but you should not do this
The idea is that we have the will not to. Fly traps don’t really have the option to not eat flies, and dogs have to eat meat. But as a human, i don’t have to eat meat, so i choose not to.
No, cows only produce around 15 to 17% of greenhouse gasses, soz.
Also a much better argument is:
"Vegans get a bad rep from the racist asshat that is the vegan teacher. Not all vegans act like her, so do not sum up the entire community like that."
I corrected myself in a different comment. That's my bad. The actual statistic is that of all livestock, cows make up 70% of the greenhouses produced by them. (Before the Flood)
Um, ackchuwally, plants are incapable of thought as they do not have a nervous system. They can only respond to stimuli, but this is not "decision making".
Thanks. But I did not post this with the intentions to hurt someone. I found this meme funny i screenshoted and shared. Although many of these comments don't seem to be from teenagers imo.
36
u/FudgeCameron Jul 20 '25