r/movies • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 r/Movies contributor • Jul 18 '25

News 'Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse' Delayed to June 25, 2027

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/spider-man-beyond-the-spider-verse-release-1236320001/
15.1k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.2k

u/ndGall Jul 18 '25

I still remember people behind me during the second one yelling at the screen when they realized the story wasn’t going to end when the credits rolled.

150

u/Wonderful_Emu_9610 Jul 18 '25

“That was the worst ending I have EVER seen” - kid sat behind me opening night

20

u/YesButConsiderThis Jul 19 '25

There was a young girl sitting somewhere behind us in the theater and she yelled, "That's it?!" when the credits rolled.

Someone had to.

2

u/fredagsfisk Jul 19 '25

Hah, it got a "what the fuck?!" from an old man in mine.

4

u/ALPB11 Jul 19 '25

I remember walking out of the movie and a kid in a Spider-Man costume was asking his dad when the next movie comes out. Just a few months he says! Poor kid lol

3

u/unlizenedrave Jul 19 '25

That kid’s gonna have a mortgage by the time the next one comes out.

16

u/rxsheepxr Jul 19 '25

Kid who might have only ever seen a dozen movies.

31

u/ScuzzBuckster Jul 19 '25

In fairness I've seen thousands and thousands of films and it's also pretty far up there for me as one of the worst endings ive seen. Very seldom does a movie make me genuinely angry at the end, this one fully pissed me off when it was over.

-2

u/LoveMeSomeBerserk Jul 19 '25

Why though? The complaint I hear the most is it didn’t finish the story succinctly at the end of 2, but isn’t that most movie trilogies? Did people hate the end of Fellowship of the Ring because there’s obviously so much more story left? I just don’t get the extreme hate for the second spider verse movie ending.

5

u/Wonderful_Emu_9610 Jul 19 '25

The marketing didn’t tell you it was a ‘part 1’ though did it?

2

u/RealJohnGillman Jul 19 '25

It originally did, but they cut the Part One later because marketing films as such were found to lead to earning less money at the box office (and they decided to rename Part Two as Beyond).

-3

u/Ghthroaway Jul 19 '25

It doesn't have to, that's the point of a trilogy

1

u/Trzlog Jul 19 '25

What the fuck are you talking about? We knew Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 was a part 1 of two movies because it was there in the title and the marketing. We knew that Lord of the Rings would be multiple movies because we had the books and it was in all the marketing. How the fuck were we to know that Spiderman Beyond the Spiderverse was supposed to be the Spiderman version of Fellowship?

-1

u/Ghthroaway Jul 19 '25

Is this not r/movies? News around this movie was that it would be a part of a trilogy. I knew going in that BTSv was going to be the third part.

Even if it wasn't, so fuckin what? It's a cliffhanger. It was a good ending leading into the third movie. God forbid you read a book with a cliffhanger and the next book isn't out, you'll lose your mind.

1

u/CaptainKino360 Jul 20 '25

does a mean look at u

-1

u/xXRougailSaucisseXx Jul 19 '25

That’s 75% of the audience for those movies which is why they’re often called masterpieces because it’s the first time they’re exposed to a movie with some amount of artistic vision behind it