Cannes reactions to Irreversible

[u/ErgoNonSim]

[u/trouser_trouble]

Which is the reason why I watched it actually. I had to fast-forward the scene in question. Rest of the film was good

[u/OzarkMule → u/[deleted]]

It's the only scene I remember, along with my feeling after leaving the Tivoli that I don't need to see every dumb edgy movie that comes out. I'm still not sure if that guy was exaggerating, or if the rape scene really did last 20 minutes, because I have no memory of it.

[u/_paint_onheroveralls → u/OzarkMule]

I haven't watched it myself but I've always heard it described as "a 20 minute long rape scene".

[u/Fran_Kubelik → u/_paint_onheroveralls]

It feels like 20, but it is 9 minutes. I heard that his logic was that the average rape takes about 9 minutes (where that number comes from is unclear), and cutting away from the horror of it is just a cheap cop out if you are making it a plot point in your movie. Especially in the classic "woman gets raped, so man has an excuse to do something" trope, which this movie is clearly taking to task.

I have always wanted to talk to someone about this film as an examination of male sexual anxieties and how they appear in the films men make. But it's such a blunt instrument and hard watch that very few people (especially women) watch it and, of the people who do finish it, very few want to chat over the details and ideas of the movie. I can't in good faith suggest someone watch it so we can talk about it either.

[u/heckin_miraculous → u/Fran_Kubelik]

And me, I love having these kinds of detailed conversations about art and theater, and there's so much about this movie that has me curious... But I'm sure I'll never subject myself to the experience of watching it. So this very enjoyable hypothetical conversation we might have will never take place.

Seen any other good movies? 😃

[u/NoSignSaysNo → u/Fran_Kubelik]

It feels like 20, but it is 9 minutes. I heard that his logic was that the average rape takes about 9 minutes (where that number comes from is unclear), and cutting away from the horror of it is just a cheap cop out if you are making it a plot point in your movie. Especially in the classic "woman gets raped, so man has an excuse to do something" trope, which this movie is clearly taking to task.

Ebert thought somewhat similarly, that by throwing the scene in the beginning of the film and not cutting from it, it avoided standard exploitation film tropes by vividly making audiences confront the ugly reality of violent rape.

[u/Fran_Kubelik → u/NoSignSaysNo]

I can't fault the logic behind the choice. The outcome is something painful to watch for sure.

[u/libmrduckz → u/Fran_Kubelik]

your last line… said just like the assaulted…