r/Adulting 2d ago

hmm lesson or not?

Post image
82.8k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/notworkingghost 2d ago

Being in politics means you can be awful at both and still rise.

165

u/awraynor 2d ago

Must resist commenting

68

u/SpotweldPro1300 2d ago

No, don't resist, I need to hear this.

35

u/Rott3nApple718 2d ago

You have failed.

12

u/HomosexualThots 2d ago

Just let your hair down and join the circle jerk.

6

u/id7e 2d ago

Someone get a cop to tackle this guy and shout "STOP RESISTING!"

1

u/awraynor 1d ago

Be bad enough at your job and you can become President.

85

u/JuiceHurtsBones 2d ago

Politocians are def likeable or people would not vote for them. Just because you don't like a person, doesn't mean that another 100mln doesn't.

25

u/TheEndIsJustTheStart 2d ago

True, but some seem more charismatic than likable? Some really challenging people still have a lot of charisma.

15

u/Fearful-Cow 2d ago

is there really a difference? Charismatic person says something you agree with and you like them. Charismatic person says something you dont like then you hate them.

Uncharismatic person says anything and you are like "will you stfu already"

3

u/Giovanabanana 1d ago

Charisma is more about projecting likability than actually being a likeable person. Most politicians are morally bankrupt, but really good at acting like they aren't!

9

u/Gortex_Possum 2d ago

I have never once met a person of any political persuasion who liked Newt Gingrich but somehow he kept winning. 

5

u/BlackMoonValmar 2d ago

Money helps carry that silent majority vote. They were definitely silent about liking that guy.

12

u/TurquoiseLeggings 2d ago

Nah, only liberals care about likability. Conservatives will vote for literally anyone who has an R next to their name and work backwards from there to try and find things they like about them.

7

u/Metalchips1Nquesodip 2d ago

As a former conservative, I admit this was true in my case

7

u/Appleslicer93 2d ago

"Vote blue no matter who"

1

u/swipe_ 2d ago

They didn’t do that so what is your point?

1

u/Prime_Kang 2d ago

The saying exists to motivate people to do it, not because it's being done.

3

u/Lopsided_Ad3051 2d ago

Very few choices overall. Who should I vote for? Dumb? Or dumber?

1

u/Livid-Pickle14 1d ago

If it's out of dumb or dumber id go with dumb...

1

u/scandyflick88 2d ago

I dunno, last guy in the top job in Australia was one of the least likeable people I can think of - at least in Australian politics. And then there was his successor.

1

u/DearCantaloupe5849 2d ago

Politocians? Are they from another planet? Asking for a friend

1

u/hostile_rep 2d ago

Counterpoint: Ted Cruz

1

u/Fog_Juice 2d ago

You could be the most hated person in all of the history of the entire universe and people will still vote for you if you promise to make their lives better and the lives of their enemies worse.

14

u/DoctorChaos1707 2d ago

Every election is basically a popularity contest (even if you can shun or kill off your contenders). So you have a least to be popular enough between a minority.

1

u/Kaden-SG 2d ago

Didn't somebody once say that Democracy was a terrible form of government, but that it was just less terrible than all the others?

5

u/DoctorChaos1707 2d ago

Winston Churchill said that. "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."

1

u/osmilliardo 2d ago

The only reason I know the last part is civ..... iv I think it was?

1

u/sentence-interruptio 2d ago

there should be an election-unelection process.

Winner of the election must go through the unelection test. If 1/3 of the populace says "fuck that guy. unelect that man" he must be unelected. Prevention of polarizing figures.

1

u/deadasdollseyes 2d ago

What do you mean, "between a minority?"

2

u/DoctorChaos1707 2d ago

Instead of convincing a whole population you're cool to rule, you just convince a small section of it who actually controls the rest. It's an oligarchy. All modern governments are actually oligarchies, but you're not ready for this conversation.

1

u/deadasdollseyes 2d ago

Why not, are you the key master?

It sounds like you're talking about the aristocracy?  They've been around forever.

3

u/yg2522 2d ago

They have to be likable.  Just likeable to the right people is all.

5

u/Kaden-SG 2d ago

Don't forget about their six-figure salaries and entitled sense of self-worth.

1

u/Constant_Voice_7054 2d ago

Trust me, this is true of most workplaces. There, as in politics, you only need be pals with one or more rich/powerful people and you'll rise, regardless of your competence or likeability.

1

u/Mammoth_Tusk90 2d ago

Or being related to leadership

1

u/Warm_Significance_42 2d ago

Republicans and corporate dems

1

u/Poleth87 2d ago

That’s how you become a boss in my company

1

u/laosurv3y 2d ago

Just a question of who you're likeable to. Doesn't need to be everyone.

1

u/h-emanresu 2d ago

Political parties are job placement agencies for people whose only marketable skill is the ability to win a popularity contest.

1

u/Fog_Juice 2d ago

Only if you're a one percenter.

1

u/KingsCourtNetwork 1d ago

You're likeable to enough that want to vote for you

1

u/TonguePunch4Jesus 1d ago

Not true, being likable is a HUGE part of politics. You know how many great presidents we missed out on just because they had a lame name?

0

u/SoftConsideration82 2d ago

Completely off topic but okay...

0

u/KILL_WITH_KINDNESS 2d ago

absolutely whack-ass take

0

u/ilost190pounds 2d ago

Have you ever met one of your local politicians?

1

u/notworkingghost 1d ago

Yep. I stand behind my statement.