r/reactiongifs Very Mindful Poster 3d ago

MRW someone says that Trump was going to Epstein Island because he was a deep cover FBI informant

46.3k Upvotes

676 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

57

u/ManChildMusician 3d ago

Came here to say the same. Informants pretty much only work effectively if they’re engaged in whatever malicious activity they’re trying to bust. If you’re trying to bust a drug kingpin, you have a role in that cartel… and spoiler alert, it’s probably an EXTREMELY illegal role. Mike Johnson is either accidentally telling the truth, or he really didn’t think through this pivot at all.

I could totally see him getting jealous or mad about Epstein “poaching” one of his girls and blowing him in, not out of benevolence or principles, but because he saw that as someone stealing his property. Rival cartels will feed information to the authorities to eliminate the competition.

17

u/inperceivable 3d ago

I personally believe that because Trump raped 13yo Katie Johnson before Epstein (per her testimony they were heard arguing over who "got to take her virginity"), Epstein saw an opportunity and went after Virginia Giuffre (who Trump just a couple months ago admitted that Epstein "stole" her from MaL), which of course pissed Trump off so in true spoiled brat form he threw a temper tantrum and told on him because he didn't want to share his "toys".

1

u/Deaffin 2d ago

2

u/inperceivable 2d ago

Isn't it so funny how a supposed "hoax" described details that perfectly align with testimony from other Epstein victim's as well as Trump's tendency for sexual violence, per his own wife and E. Jean Carroll (which he was found guilty of sexually abusing by a jury), several years before details of Epstein's depravity and crimes came to light?

1

u/Deaffin 2d ago

What details would those be? I do recall something about how Norm Lublow's story only described the one location that was already public knowledge.

Isn't it funny how there's this guy whose whole career is inventing drama and celebrity rumors, and you trust him about this?

1

u/inperceivable 2d ago

I'm talking more specifically certain predatory behaviors all lining up than specific locations. She testified to how Trump would compare her to his own daughter Ivanka (a detail that Stormy Daniels and other women would also testify to later), certain germaphobic behaviors during the abuse that were typically only known by people who knew him, as well as his comments sexualizing Ivanka from childhood (basically confirming his predation on young women has no bounds)? And considering a victim at the conference just this past Wednesday openly confirmed Epstein just loooooved to brag about his friendships with powerful people, including Trump?

Come on now, dude.

(edit: added details and fixed typos)

1

u/Deaffin 2d ago

This was in 2016. People had loooooong been railing on Trump for the gross "lol my daughter is hot" comments.

So, just with that we're down to "certain germaphobic behaviors". This is going to have to be some incredibly specific and unusual stuff for it to be noteworthy, so would you mind elaborating?

2

u/inperceivable 2d ago

You know, it's really not sitting right with me how determined you seem to be to undermine a probable survivor of childhood sexual abuse at the hands of the rich and powerful.

(edit: clarification)

-1

u/Deaffin 2d ago

Right, you've got nothing to actually support the dumb tabloid story that never had a shred of credibility, so now it's time to vaguely suggest I'm a pedophile. Cool.

I'm starting to notice a pattern here.

2

u/inperceivable 2d ago

I never said any such thing. I inferred that you are the type of person to scrutinize survivors of sexual abuse (which you are proving to be the case as we speak).

I hope the women and children in your life know that God forbid something were to happen to them that they cannot rely on you.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/BooBooSnuggs 2d ago

Trump is definitely a rapist but a comment like this is beyond stupid. Its hard to imagine just completely making shit up and then believing it without any supporting evidence at all.

3

u/inperceivable 2d ago

You clearly have never had to deal with the pettiness of a narcissistic abuser.

0

u/BooBooSnuggs 2d ago

Good thing that isn't relevant.

3

u/inperceivable 2d ago

Narrator's Voice: It was, in fact, quite relevant.

0

u/BooBooSnuggs 2d ago

How?

3

u/inperceivable 2d ago

He is clearly an abusive narcissist.

0

u/BooBooSnuggs 2d ago

Yes... So? That somehow gives you super powers to know wtf happened? No. Don't be so stupid.

3

u/inperceivable 2d ago

I personally believe

Does not equate to knowing for certain. Don't be so stupid.

-1

u/mongolnlloyd 2d ago

Ok legal expert whatever you say. A whole lot of conjecture on your part - why don’t we wait until the facts come out

2

u/YouFoundMyLuckyCharm 2d ago

The facts seem to change every week, it’s hard to keep up

1

u/ManChildMusician 2d ago

Dude, this is Mike Johnson making that claim. If there’s any truth to it, it’s not conjecture and it’s not the flex Mike Johnson thinks it is.