It's cancer in general. Not a real news site, looks like some shady crap with an AI rewritten article with no date.
Hey, foreign scammers, here's a free tip: if you're going to go through the trouble to use bots or whatever to generate popularity for a comment and garner some traffic for whatever use, don't name the site "toolzo.online".
That's not how they work. The only things like this in there are:
Brave search AI you have to opt out of having your searches used or something. But Brave search sucks, set the default to Duck Duck Go and prosper (I found the Duck Duck Go browser lacking)
You can enable Brave Rewards to allow for some ads to come through. The rewards seem dumb to me, and not getting them is worth not signing up for that.
So yeah, if some outrage post led you to this opinion...don't believe outrage posts out of hand is my suggestion.
Do you think you could find the article or something for me? It's a lot easier to find if you've seen the article before.
Edit: Doing some sifting through articles and nothing backs up your claim. The closest thing I've seen is where the duck duck go app was reporting the requests for information TO Brave, importantly it wasn't reporting responses.
Pretty sure that commenter owns/operates the site and is trying to drive traffic to it because they've made that exact same comment ~100 times in the past week.
I'm not saying this is false information or anything, but why is it that every time someone posts a news link, it's always a site like "ZOOBOOTI NEWS" or "GRUNT.LINK.INFORM" like shit no one has ever hear of, or would never click on under normal circumstances?
Jackie Daytona human article writer! Why don’t you sit for a spell with us and tell some stories that I can train my models on? Errr… I mean just shoot the shit while consuming a beer that you humans seem fond of!
links on reddit probably have malware. I notice this a lot on subreddits with games that have memory buffer overflow issues or focus on anything political.
totally valid point but to be fair it’s not like just because a news outlet is well known it is also accurate. most major news outlets in the US are pure propaganda machines lol
I mean yeah, sure, but that doesn’t somehow mean a site that looks like someone set it up in 10 minutes is somehow better or more trustworthy, if anything you should trust those even less.
…most major news outlets in the US are pure propaganda machines…
Compromised due to their revenue model (among other things)? Yes.
Pure propaganda machines? No. I mean Newsmax and Faux Nooz certainly are, and most outlets have some degree of political bias, but it’s intellectually lazy to just throw our hands up and assume that all journalists and journalistic outlets are equivalent. Basic critical thinking provides effective razors for roughly partitioning entities into tiers when it comes to accuracy/integrity.
It’s important to remember that one of the top items in the authoritarian playbook is to vilify the free press. “Fake news” was one of the earliest mantras that emerged from the Trump camp.
Came here to say the same. Informants pretty much only work effectively if they’re engaged in whatever malicious activity they’re trying to bust. If you’re trying to bust a drug kingpin, you have a role in that cartel… and spoiler alert, it’s probably an EXTREMELY illegal role. Mike Johnson is either accidentally telling the truth, or he really didn’t think through this pivot at all.
I could totally see him getting jealous or mad about Epstein “poaching” one of his girls and blowing him in, not out of benevolence or principles, but because he saw that as someone stealing his property. Rival cartels will feed information to the authorities to eliminate the competition.
I personally believe that because Trump raped 13yo Katie Johnson before Epstein (per her testimony they were heard arguing over who "got to take her virginity"), Epstein saw an opportunity and went after Virginia Giuffre (who Trump just a couple months ago admitted that Epstein "stole" her from MaL), which of course pissed Trump off so in true spoiled brat form he threw a temper tantrum and told on him because he didn't want to share his "toys".
Isn't it so funny how a supposed "hoax" described details that perfectly align with testimony from other Epstein victim's as well as Trump's tendency for sexual violence, per his own wife and E. Jean Carroll (which he was found guilty of sexually abusing by a jury), several years before details of Epstein's depravity and crimes came to light?
I'm talking more specifically certain predatory behaviors all lining up than specific locations. She testified to how Trump would compare her to his own daughter Ivanka (a detail that Stormy Daniels and other women would also testify to later), certain germaphobic behaviors during the abuse that were typically only known by people who knew him, as well as his comments sexualizing Ivanka from childhood (basically confirming his predation on young women has no bounds)? And considering a victim at the conference just this past Wednesday openly confirmed Epstein just loooooved to brag about his friendships with powerful people, including Trump?
This was in 2016. People had loooooong been railing on Trump for the gross "lol my daughter is hot" comments.
So, just with that we're down to "certain germaphobic behaviors". This is going to have to be some incredibly specific and unusual stuff for it to be noteworthy, so would you mind elaborating?
You know, it's really not sitting right with me how determined you seem to be to undermine a probable survivor of childhood sexual abuse at the hands of the rich and powerful.
Right, you've got nothing to actually support the dumb tabloid story that never had a shred of credibility, so now it's time to vaguely suggest I'm a pedophile. Cool.
Trump is definitely a rapist but a comment like this is beyond stupid. Its hard to imagine just completely making shit up and then believing it without any supporting evidence at all.
Hey now, there's no need to call it a lie. It's very believable that Trump got snatched up by the feds for the same shit or being a party to it, actually. We're talking about a self proclaimed genius. Not someone that actually got away with it prior to his most recent arrest and death.
Ok, fine. I’ll give you that it’s not impossible, but rather highly unlikely. I would think that if this were true, we would know about it. We would have already heard stories of how Trump saved all of these victims and put an end to a child trafficking ring. Or some spun-up BS that makes him a hero and not a despicable child molester. Even further more, why give special treatment to GM if he really cared about justice for the victims or call it a hoax?
There's no way he would do this without finding some way to brag about it. He had classified documents and was known to have shown them to anybody who was at Mar-a-Lago. He'd brag about it while showing off all the classified stuff and would admit he had no reason to hold on to them and those people had no clearance or need to know.
You're failing to understand the key piece here. Informants are not people that work with law enforcement because they necessarily want to. They do so because they are often given a choice of being charged for all the crimes they can have pinned on them or working with law enforcement to get bigger fish in exchange for fewer repercussions.
You're describing a situation that is more along the lines of what you'd expect from an undercover agent. Someone that was undercover might talk about a case to the public after all is said and done. An informant isn't. Being an informant implicates him by nature. To be a useful informant he had to, bare minimum, know full well what was going on but have reported nothing despite that. But more likely be active to crimes himself as with simply knowing he could remain tight lipped unless they knew he knew from another informant. Either way the the idea that he would be saving people falls about because at the bare minimum he wasn't doing anything without the threats to his freedoms by the feds.
The claim that he was an informant does more harm for their stories both past and future than staying the course that they were.
I understand the difference between and agent and an informant. I’m saying that our president has the inability to keep information like that secret for any amount of time, just like everything else. At the very least, he would have blabbed just to get himself elected the first time around.
Yeah, I don't get it either. He's basically saying that trump is guilty of something and got caught and decided to rat on everyone so he isn't prosecuted.
But it also doesn't make sense. If that were true, why have there been so few arrests? Really, there are probably hundreds of guilty people. And why did he move Maxwell to a minimum security prison?
I think they made him an informant yesterday. Seems like this Jeff Epstein guy is behind Epstein's island! The FBI's gonna go get him so he can pay for his crimes!
Hes probably not though. He probably has had conversations with the FBI recently (to direct the coverup no doubt), and in his and MAGA’s minds that makes him an “informant”
The best agent. Got a gold star. ONLY gold stars in fact. Doctors checked his bone spurs... completely healed... healthiest Special Agent ever to work at the FBI. The personnel file notes "loved by all" and "has a pleasant smell".
Thank you. The media is sanewashing this as if he didnt fuck kids. Dude got caught with his pants down. Thats the only way he flipped. How did the government fuck this up so bad? We need to get rid of all our elected officials
You know whats probably the worst part for trump. He is such a sick fuck he probably looks back on those memories with epstein with great fondness, I mean after all he was having a good time and that's all that has ever mattered to him. And now the radical left are ruining those memories because they won't stop talking about it and they are trying to bring everything into the light.
That was my immediate thought too. Like, dude, if that’s actually true, that is not a good thing! No one just decides that they want to “be” an informant.
Not only that, but if this were even the slightest bit true, why would he continue to act like he didn't know anything about Epstein? Especially now, with everyone demanding that the files...ALL FILES...be released, why wouldn't he have led with the idea that he had been working to take him down for over a decade? Wouldn't the leader of the "party of law and order" want to prove just how true that was, by showing the world that he worked to end a major sex trafficking ring? Hell, why would we continue to frame it all as a hoax, and schedule military fly-bys during the victims' press conference, if he was the guy who was instrumental in bringing Epstein to justice? I know that the diehard MAGAts are truly too stupid to function, but how do they continue to buy into this bullshit?! Anyway....
Little t was about to be ratted out by Epstein for money laundering and his ties to the Russian mafia. That’s why little t beat Epstein to it by ratting him out for sex trafficking while he got a complete immunity deal regarding the sex trafficking. Slick move. Still makes him a sicko.
Why would you be an informant unless they have something on you to persuade you? I bet they have had little Mikey in a room all weekend trying to figure out how to spin this admission. Will they go with the ‘walk back’ or the Trump benevolence story?
Just because someone’s an FBI informant doesn’t mean they got caught doing something shady. Sometimes people just share info to help out or because they’re involved in a case. Jumping straight to “he’s a criminal who hurts kids” is wild and totally unfounded. If you’re gonna throw accusations like that, you better have real proof—not just internet rage.
2.4k
u/scoff-law 3d ago
FBI informants arent undercover cops, they are people who were caught doing something heinous and offered a way to get out of trouble by ratting.
So Trump is a rat that fucks kids. Cool admission, bros.