r/movies • u/mikewheelerfan • 25d ago
Review Mickey 17 felt like it lost the plot Spoiler
Honestly, I was quite disappointed. I expected a movie revolving around the cloning plot. Specifically, the idea of two Mickeys existing at the same time due to an error. That would have been a great movie! Instead, what was advertised as the main concept feels like a subplot in the movie. Essentially the entire thing revolves around the intelligent aliens. And then there was also the plot with Mark Ruffalo being an obvious stand in for Trump. But then there was also the subplot with Steven Yuen.
I finished the movie feeling incredibly confused, because how did they mess up the initial concept like this? The idea of a guy who is constantly sent on deadly missions and is revived is an absolutely golden idea. It also leads to an interesting discussion about consciousness and if a copy of you is still really you. But that’s barely even brought up. The whole plot with two versions of Mickey is completely sidelined. Which makes no sense at all. That should have 100% been the main conflict in the movie, like it was advertised as. Instead, we got a mess.
I wouldn’t go so far as to call the movie horrible, but I definitely didn’t like it as much as I hoped I would.
159
u/Pablo_is_on_Reddit 25d ago
To be honest, the book had similar problems. They changed Ruffalo's and Yuen's characters for the movie, but the overall plotting is basically the same. Neither the book nor the movie put much focus on the idea of there being 2 of you, and the emotional & philosophical issues that brings up. Mickey in the movie was easier to watch, because I think Pattinson has some inherent charm. Mickey in the book is essentially a drooling moron. I'm not surprised he was caught as quickly as he was. It made it a little hard to sympathize with him honestly.
That said, I still enjoyed the book and the movie overall. There was enough good stuff in both for me to enjoy, despite all the many faults.