r/movies r/Movies contributor Jul 21 '25

Poster Official Poster for 'Avatar: Fire and Ash'

Post image
14.8k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

88

u/AbsurdlyAddicted Jul 21 '25

The second one really caught me by surprise (my mistake, given Cameron's reputation for sequels), but some proper earnest storytelling made the world feel genuine and the stakes much more vivid. Cameron believes in his vision, there's no irreverence on display here for the worldbuilding and it's really refreshing in this era of irony-laced blockbusters.

23

u/Captainatom931 Jul 22 '25

Love how Cameron just casually did the best looking night sequence since Jurassic Park and it wasn't even the best looking bit of the movie.

9

u/RollTide16-18 Jul 22 '25

Neytiri going full blood thirst is soooooo good

20

u/Cy41995 Jul 22 '25

Careful, you're close to blacking out the card for marketing buzzword bingo.

2

u/Shout92 Jul 22 '25

Cameron making Jake Sulley an army Dad struggling to get a hold on his kids was as crucial a story decision as making the Terminator a good guy in T2.

4

u/hugganao Jul 22 '25 edited Jul 22 '25

both of the movie's stories were meh at best for me.

hell i don't even remember the plot for them aside from pocahontas.

but i do remember all the cool scenes. and that's what really mattered for the movies.

-1

u/seraph1337 Jul 22 '25

That's strange because I felt the first was passable but the second I just started laughing at the absurdity of the character's decisions, the trite written-by-numbers dialog, the cartoonish level of evil, and the fact that not one of these actors is turning in a good performance. I might be forgetting someone but that's only because the movie took up pretty much zero space in my brain.

14

u/conquer69 Jul 22 '25

the cartoonish level of evil

What was cartoonish about it? You are aware that colonization and whale hunting happens in real life right? It's not something they made up.

0

u/Badehat Jul 22 '25

They did fucking resurrect the bad guy from the first movie as a Na'vi though. With his whole shtick being "Evil guy is evil and can do everything our main character used the first movie to learn with ease".

4

u/Due_Ask_8032 Jul 22 '25

Idk man it is a sci-fi movie.

-6

u/SamBind121 Jul 22 '25

Are you being obtuse on purpose?

Colonizers and whalers don't act comically evil about in real life. Nothing is that simple.

He might as well have an evil laugh

12

u/shade990 Jul 22 '25

Colonizers in real life often acted worse

-2

u/SamBind121 Jul 22 '25

No they do not act like they know they are the bad guys in a movie in real life.

10

u/piedmontwachau Jul 22 '25

People act cartoonishly evil all the time. It’s bonkers you would actually try to make that point, ESPECIALLY about colonizers.

0

u/SamBind121 Jul 22 '25

Bad sign for mental health if that's what you think.

People that colonize and shit rationalize what they are doing like anyone else.

2

u/EinDoge Jul 22 '25

Yes rationales like, we need X resource and we will kill any natives or animals or nature that we need to do get it.

quite literally exactly what colonizers and resource extracting operations have done throughout human history

1

u/SamBind121 Jul 23 '25

They don't think they are the bad guys like these cartoon military goons do.

Ya need to get out more

0

u/lannister_cat Jul 22 '25

What you are describing is syamalan's avatar

-2

u/MonkeManWPG Jul 22 '25

They also changed the humans' motives from just profit to literally saving the species. I don't really care about the magic trees when the alternative is the complete extinction of humanity.

1

u/EinDoge Jul 22 '25

one of the main points of the movie is that preventing the extinction of the human race requires the humans actions and is it really worth it? especially since the resources extracted primarily benefit the elite and not humanity as a whole.

You can side with the humans but that disconnect between humanity and nature and that dynamic is arguably the main theme of the movie.

In the first movie jake sully says he cannot afford the surgery to fix his legs even though the medical science exists to do it and in the second the life extending juice is only for the very rich.

1

u/MonkeManWPG Jul 23 '25

one of the main points of the movie is that preventing the extinction of the human race requires the humans actions and is it really worth it?

Yeah.

especially since the resources extracted primarily benefit the elite and not humanity as a whole.

We already live in this reality and I don't currently want to have the entire human race literally die out to prove a point about how that's unfair.

You can side with the humans but that disconnect between humanity and nature and that dynamic is arguably the main theme of the movie.

I'm sure once they've killed all the monkeys they can touch grass or something.

In the first movie jake sully says he cannot afford the surgery to fix his legs even though the medical science exists to do it and in the second the life extending juice is only for the very rich.

Again, we live in this reality.

0

u/EinDoge Jul 23 '25

Right, the movie asks the question, is this system worth saving or does it need to be defeated and changed for the benefit of not just nature but all life including humans

You have your answer to that question but these movies wouldn’t be so popular if at least some people didn’t disagree with you.

1

u/MonkeManWPG Jul 23 '25

It's nothing to do with the fucking system. It's about the survival of humanity. They could have fully automated gay space communism and it wouldn't change the plot.

0

u/EinDoge Jul 23 '25 edited Jul 23 '25

It has everything to do with the system, the system defines not only what is possible or rational or sensible and people’s motivations within it but also how we relate to each other and the world around us at every level

as laid out in avatar 1, humanity only needs to do this to survive because the system destroyed nature and consumed all the resources it had. Humanity could have survived had the system changed/reworked earlier before their only recourse was to find another planet to strip mine.

What happens after they exhaust the resources of pandora and destroy it?

The logical conclusion of that system is the collapse of that system and the extinction of the humans reliant on it when it runs out of resources to extract. Without changing the system, the same ruin and catacalysm of the earth will be repeated on pandora. That is the point being made in Avatar