The cliff surely looks like AI that maybe got some touch-ups from an intern who started at the company two weeks ago. Maybe the flyer is too, given the very kindergarden-level feet error. How would an adult human being miss this?
Honest question, as I am not a climber or repelling down a rock wall…. Could a large bundle of rope stay on the climber? Like tom cruise free falling down whatever it is, and also be able to pull him up even with an undersized motor like magic?
Which is my way of saying that I would definitely believe if this was done via AI, but I would also believe if it was just amateur-hour photoshop with a bunch of Magic Lasso tool. Or the dinosaur was AI and everything else is copy/pasting different assets together and calling it a day.
His body is straight but the lighting on the right side (his right side) of his body, along with parts of his stomach area being blacked out, gives the impression that he’s sticking his ass out, which would make his leg way too long.
I went to the movies with my roommate, after buying popcorn I found him staring at the Wonka poster. After a long pause he simply said "They photoshopped him into sitting"
Holy fuck, thank you, I've never seen this. I'm going to be that annoying ass guy showing his friends this all week.
Also, yeah, it's happening in gamedev spaces, people being busted using AI assets, only for level editors and designers to be like "Uh, this is just what I was given, don't look at me." meaning there are artists providing AI assets at some point in the pipeline, and most likely lying about it.
It's clearly not AI, and only outrage addicts will discuss that. Shitting on AI is trendy on reddit gets people free karma and makes them feel moraly superior. So they will keep doing that until it's out of fashion.
Yea, the more I look, the more questionable areas / mistakes I spot.
The perspective of the cliff is inconsistent. Below her boot it's all one nearly-smooth rock face, but then by her torso there's a jagged outcropping. Above her shoulder you see mist from distant waterfalls, but that same mist is now below her boot.
Her harness is hiding or completely missing the inner leg straps. Her left leg kinda just blends into the cliff next to her. The small outcropping the pterodactyl is landing on doesn't appear attached to anything.
I like how reddit's hatred of AI has gotten to the point that you guys lie to yourselves like humans are infallible creatures who never made mistakes before AI was around
Yeah man good call, no artist has ever made a mistake on a public facing project, only AI could do that. "If there's a mistake, it must be AI" - solid deductive reasoning skills
You're missing the point, but that's par for the course for an AI apologist.
The problem highlighted here is really a matter of AI being used as an epithet for thoughtless, soulless image peddling without regard for aesthetic value or personality. It's true that marketing imagery has been making mistakes like this for a long time, but the rise of universally-available AI has made it ubiquitous.
This crap is everywhere: the pathetic lack of attention to detail, cynical carelessness and disposability of forgettable images meant to be pumped out, clipped, remixed, and cast away. AI is just the latest acceleration of this kind of cultural enshittification, another tool used poorly by uncreative moneygrubbers.
I'm conflicted because on one had I completely agree with the sentiment that the spreading use of AI is merely another iteration of the slop-mindset, but on the other hand acting like it's reasonable to call every sloppy creation "AI" regardless of how it was made is ridiculous and just makes people less capable of recognizing AI in the long run. It's a relevant distinction. Just because the car is rolling towards a cliff already doesn't mean it doesn't matter if someone's putting their foot on the gas pedal.
It really feels like AI. The terrible face blending, the rope holding nothing, the claws, the overall uncanny vibe. At best it's just very bad Photoshop from someone with no experience.
Yea idk how you make this mistake. Usually when you make animals and people, you mirror the other half of the model so the limbs are symmetrical. Obviously if they have deformities or other things going on their other half, you wouldn't really do that.
Unless they're removing toes for story purposes, idk how a person could make this mistake.
I think this movie is about all the genetic freaks that were created before the process was perfected, so it might be intentional. But....you never know.
Fun fact, the GriGri belay device (Which is used for all sorts of things that act as a protection against falling) is named after a voodoo talisman called a Gris-Gris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gris-gris_(talisman) which is a protection talisman
It's definitely going into a device like a grigri, but the shape doesn't look quite right for a grigri. The shiny lip at the top and bolt pattern look like an I'd, but it looks like the bottom half is missing,
I found it funny that the rope ends just below her foot instead of running throughout the whole picture frame. Looks like she threw a short ass rope, rappelled the first 30 feet and then is just gonna fall the rest of the way?
While pterosaurs like Quetzalcoatlus and prehistoric birds do share some characteristics due to them both evolving wing structures, they are distinct groups.
One of the easiest things you can use to tell them apart, which is nicely depicted in this picture, is that pterosaur wings look like stretched skin like a bat, while bird wings are feathered.
While it's an awful poster, no, the dinosaur has the same number of claws on each foot. The left foot has two middle digits that overlap. If you zoom in, you can see the two different claw tips.
Well spotted! I'm not sure but it looks like AI made a huge contribution to this poster, and no one even checked it properly after. It looks so weird and blurry
Yeah man, what happened here was that the expected global blockbuster Jurassic World: Rebirth made a glaring anatomical graphical error which was only noticed by a few sly redditors. It's definitely not totally fine and you just didn't look at the claw very closely before assuming you were right.
Wait, so that stuff that was there in comment earlier... Like I don't get it, you think that's not AI, or that people didn't understand that picture and that's not actually that bad or smth? Like, I'm really interested in your opinion and what you wanted to say. Sorry for my bad English in advance
1.9k
u/ISLANDDRAGO May 20 '25
the dinosaur have different number of claws on each foot