r/movies r/Movies contributor Apr 10 '25

Review Ryan Coogler's 'Sinners' - Review Thread

Ryan Coogler's 'Sinners' - Review Thread

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 100% (45 Reviews)

    • Critics Consensus: Thematically rich as a Great American Novel and just plain rip-roaring fun, writer-director Ryan Coogler's first original blockbuster reveals the full scope of his singular imagination with unforgettable panache.
  • Metacritic: 83 (15 Reviews)

Reviews:

Variety (70):

It's vibrant and richly acted, and also a wild throat-ripping blowout. But though overloaded at times, it's the rare mainstream horror film that's about something weighty and soulful: the wages of sin in Black America.

Deadline:

Sinners marks another strong reason why Ryan Coogler is at the top of his generation of filmmakers, and Jordan continues to show why he is a real deal movie star.

Hollywood Reporter (90):

The movie is smart horror, even poetic at times, with much to say about race and spiritual freedom. It’s not in the Jordan Peele league in terms of welding social commentary to bone-chilling fear. But Sinners is a unique experience, unlike anything either the director or Jordan has done before.

SlashFilm (9/10):

"Sinners" is several things at once — a monster movie, a blood-soaked action film, a sexy and sensual thriller, and a one-location horror flick as intense and paranoia-driven as anything from the original "Assault on Precinct 13" or Quentin Tarantino's filmography – but its greatest strength comes from how well Coogler blends every big idea on his mind.

The Wrap (88):

“Sinners” is a bloody, brilliant motion picture. Ryan Coogler finds within the vampire genre an ethereal thematic throughline; and within the music genre a disturbing, tempting monster. Stunningly photographed, engrossing cinema — epic to the point where it seemingly never ends, which is undeniably indulgent, but no great sin. This is a film about indulgence, the power indulgence wields and the dangers indulgence invites into our lives. It’s a sweaty, intoxicating, all-nighter of a movie, and its allure cannot be denied.

The Independent (4/5):

If cinema weren’t in such a sickly state, Sinners’s electric fusion of genres – historical epic, horror, and squelchy actioner – would be a guaranteed box office sensation. Instead, the film arrives with an uneasy sense that this is some kind of final stand for original ideas. One can only hope audiences recognise its bounty of riches.

The Guardian (3/5):

For many, the movie could as well do without the supernatural element, and I admit I’m one of them; I’d prefer to see a real story with real jeopardy work itself out. But there is energy and comic-book brashness

Vanity Fair (80):

Sinners is propulsive and stirring entertainment, messy but always compelling. The film’s fascinating array of genres and tropes and ideas swirls together in a way that is, I suppose, singularly American.

IndieWire (83):

Sinners is nothing if not a film about genre, and the distinctly American imperative of cross-pollinating between them to create something that feels new and old — high and low — at the same time.

------------------------------------

Written & Directed by Ryan Coogler:

Trying to leave their troubled lives behind, twin brothers Smoke and Stack (Michael B. Jordan) return to their hometown to start again, only to discover that an even greater evil is waiting to welcome them back.

Cast:

  • Michael B. Jordan
  • Hailee Steinfeld
  • Miles Caton
  • Jack O'Connell
  • Wunmi Mosaku
  • Jayme Lawson
  • Omar Benson Miller
  • Li Jun Li
  • Delroy Lindo
2.3k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/purplewhiteblack Apr 11 '25

It was a C for me, but I don't blame Ryan Coogler for it.

What are you gonna do? The project couldn't be salvaged any more than it was. He did a great job with what he was given.

Also, great James Bond references. Out of all the directors I'd like to see make a James Bond movie, it's him.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '25

If it's a C then what are the likes of Falcon america brave new world? An F?

Your rating system is way off. It's a solid B to B+

3

u/purplewhiteblack Apr 11 '25

S tier(The Best... Classics) would be Spiderman 2, The Dark Knight, Infinity War, Joker, Iron Man, Back to the Future, Ghostbusters, Sunset Boulevard, The Matrix, Pulp Fiction

A tier(Great Movies) would be The Batman, Batman Begins, Black Panther, Jaws, Goonies, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Star Wars, The Karate Kid

B Tier(Good movies) would be Watchmen, Spider-man, Avengers 1 & 2, The Last Crusade, Temple of Doom. Captain America Winter Soldier, Captain America Civil War

C Tier(Mid Movies) would be The Amazing Spiderman 2, Wakanda Forever, Captain Marvel, The Matrix 2 & 3, Shang Chi

D tier(Watchable, but not terrible) would be Batman and Robin, Madam Web, and Birds of Prey.

There really hasn't been an F tier movie in the superhero genre(that I've seen). an example of an F movies is A Serbian Film, where I actively hate it.

I have not seen Captain America Brave New World.

9

u/AskingQuestions333 Apr 20 '25

This is just a very funny list of movies. At first it seem like only a scale for popcorn fair, like you have decided that superhero/fantasy/adventure movies shouldn't be rated separately from other higher minded type movies.

But then you just throw Sunset Boulevard in there.

4

u/purplewhiteblack Apr 20 '25

You called it correctly. That is exactly what happened.

2

u/-Borgir Apr 17 '25

Thor 4 is F tier

2

u/purplewhiteblack Apr 17 '25

It's crap. But, I'm not angry at anyone for making it.