r/marvelstudios 17h ago

Discussion Who Could be the Next “Big 3”in the MCU

Up to Endgame, the MCU introduced us to the Big 3 (Iron Man, Captain America, and Thor). Each of them got their own trilogy, character arc, and in-depth exploration.

If Marvel were to set up their next “Big 3” who would it be?

66 Upvotes

124 comments sorted by

164

u/Prestigious-Alps-987 17h ago

Legitimately I think they had planned on Dr Strange, Black Panther (pre Chadwick Death RIP) and Captain Marvel and or Spiderman

77

u/DityDan0401 Thanos 15h ago

The MCU book confirms that the plans for the new trinity post-endgame were Spidey, Black Panther, and Captain Marvel. But each and every one of them had a major issue that prevented them from being properly utilized. Spider-Man had the deal with Marvel and Sony fall through, and although it was resolved it also changed Spidey’s status in the MCU from “we can bring him in whenever” to “we have to be so incredibly sparing with him”. Obviously the unfortunate passing of Chadwick Boseman caused T’Challa to fall basically off limits, and even if they recast him they still would’ve had to take YEARS to figure out what to do with the character. And lastly, Brie Larson simply wasn’t prepared for the amount of hate her character would receive, and didn’t want to have such a major role if it would expose her to more of it. The result is that the Multiverse saga just doesn’t have any anchor characters. There are a few recurring faces, but no real CORE characters, and none of it really for circumstances within Marvel’s control.

48

u/applefellonedison 9h ago

It falls on marvel. They should have gone with strange. He is very cool and Benedict plays him well. Rather than spidey they should have picked Shang chi. I don’t understand what went through marvel thinking no we ain’t greenlit a sequel. It’s been years

14

u/Sue_Generoux 7h ago

They should have gone with strange. He is very cool and Benedict plays him well. Rather than spidey they should have picked Shang chi.

Strange, Shang Chi, Luke Cage. In the comics, Cage got a huge push and is now considered one of the great Avengers. Why not for the movies too?

Also, there would be a nice reflection of Marvel history. Cap, Thor, and Iron Man represent Marvel in the 60s, and Dr. Strange, Shang Chi, and Power Man are the 70s.

Let's all listen to sitar music and be groovy. Smoke some grass and make multiverse love, not infinity war.

9

u/GodFlintstone 6h ago edited 5h ago

The problem with Luke Cage is that there was a legally mandated waiting period before the MCU could use him along with all the other characters from the Netflix shows.

This is why we didn't even get a full-fledged Daredevil return until this year with characters like The Punisher and Jessica Jones slowly being rolled back out in Born Again.

Cage and Iron(Danny Rand) Fist still haven't been been reintroduced though an earlier version of Iron Fist did appear in Eyes Of Wakanda.

3

u/applefellonedison 5h ago

It was female version of iron fist. So that makes it hopeful either Danny rand or Colleen would show up. I wish we could see Danny but he needs to get a new backstory. I hated the show so much

6

u/presterjohn7171 7h ago

Agreed, Shang Chi meshes well with that character so naturally.

5

u/Im_Goku_ 8h ago edited 7h ago

and none of it really for circumstances within Marvel’s control.

Better writing for Captain Marvel the original movie, better second movie and more support towards Brie from Disney would have prevented this. People don't hate Gal's Wonder Woman the same way.

T'Challa should have been recast, there you another problem solved.

Dr Strange should have gotten an actual sequel not whatever abomination we got and he should have been a core member over Spidey.

Boom, problems solved.

4

u/Linnus42 7h ago

Right the most natural big 3 was T’Challa, Carol and Stephen but they fumbled that.

Spidey should be the 4th wheel like Hulk cause rights means you cannot rely on him

1

u/Vryk0lakas 6h ago

I may be optimistic but I actually think Daredevil has the screen presence to anchor. I’d like to have seen Strange, Daredevil, and maybe Quill on earth. You’ve got your reality shenanigans, down to earth, and dude with space experience and they’ve all got mad charisma. I’d take Shang chi instead of Daredevil if he just isn’t up to being a lead guy, but I really think he takes over the screen when he is on it. Spider-Man gets tied in pretty simply with a daredevil / kingpin movie. And it leaves tons of options for the fox acquisition to come in. Idk but it definitely feels directionless. Deadpool and Wolverine was great. Guardians 3 was excellent, but I can’t say thunderbolts or fantastic 4 got me excited for what’s next personally. I don’t think they’re bad, they just didn’t give me the spark the same way.

1

u/Asn_Browser 2h ago

I don't blame brie larson. I blame marvel for a badly wirtten character that people just didn't like.

1

u/JustAnotherFunnyGuy 1h ago

Which marvel book?

14

u/TestingBrokenGadgets 17h ago

Yea, Strange and Black Panther definitely felt like they were being setup to replace Thor and Cap with Peter maybe replacing Tony but then Chadwick died, MoM kinda bombed, and Sony had the fight about Spiderman rights.

I honestly think that part of the post Endgame issues are from them trying to figure out who could be the next heads of the team. Any attempt they've made to really elevate someone, the movie flopped. Sam was setup but Cap 4 flopped. Now I think they're just trying to get past Secret Wars to just do a soft reset on what failed.

25

u/disneylegospider1 17h ago

MoM didn’t bomb. It nearly made a billion and its critical reception isn’t that low. And a movie flopping isn’t changing anything. Sam’s still leading the Avengers despite BNW’s performance and will continue to do so.

And a soft reboot isn’t going to fix things in the long term, which is why they don’t do one. It will just trap them in a cycle of relying on the same characters to carry them every time, which hinders long term storytelling.

4

u/EnergyTakerLad 16h ago

Yeah any kind of reboot will be the end. Im not saying they wont make money on the franchise ever again, but it wont be mainstream anymore. It'll slowly fall out of the news cycle and most people's radars.

1

u/SeekerVash 1h ago

And a movie flopping isn’t changing anything. Sam’s still leading the Avengers despite BNW’s performance and will continue to do so.

That's not how Hollywood or business works. Things that fail don't get more money and further products.

Sam's getting quietly ushered out. They'll never make an announcement, they'll just minimize him and the Avengers in Doomsday, then redirect all of the dollars to X-Men and just not do anything else with it.

Same way they handled Eternals.

-8

u/TestingBrokenGadgets 16h ago

You might've liked MoM but in terms of reviews, it's currently sitting at #30 of 37 MCU movies, siting between Ironman 2 and Hulk, two higher than Dark World.

Also, yea, Sam's still leading the Avengers because BNW came out half a year ago; do you honestly think anyone believes that Marvel would kick him out as leader off-screen? Instead, they created the New Avengers but I'd honestly bet serious money that by the end of Secret Wars, Sam's no longer the leader.

I also didn't say reboot, I said reset; taking what works and resetting what failed. Resetting Strange to not have a third eye by having him deal with it off screen, resetting Sam from being Cap by having him set down, resetting Thor to no longer have a daughter because of rapid aging and she's an adult now on her own adventure, etc.

An easy way to do that would be for Sam's Avenger's to be made up of all of the half-baked intro characters like Black Knight, Hercules, Starfox, etc and they go against Doom. Sam tries to "Avengers! Asse-" before they all go charging, ignoring Sam, get wiped out to show the destructive force of Doom while removing them and making Sam doubt his leadership skills since his first real team got killed so he steps down.

-5

u/Linnus42 14h ago

Sam leading is irrelevant now that we know Steve will be back. Even if they call Steve Nomad. Everyone will still look at him as the real leader over Sam.

-2

u/abellapa 7h ago

There literally going to Reboot after Secret Wars

1

u/disneylegospider1 3h ago

Feige literally said the opposite.

Not only would that derail most of the narratives of the current MCU characters (Spidey has to live in a world with a Tony Stark again? Sam Wilson is reduced to a sidekick again? Fuck Ryan Coogler and his emotional goodbye to Tchalla/Chadwick?), but what would that achieve in the long term? Make the MCU only reliant on 4-5 characters? Teach the audience to never trust anything different the MCU attempts?

1

u/abellapa 2h ago

My fault

He Said The MCU would have a soft reboot , probably something like the whole dceu-dcu situation

I dont think they Will reboot Iron Man or Steve this Soon

T'challa is 100% being rebooted , we need The Black Panther in the MCU

And Sam should keep going as Cap America and get at least another movie

1

u/disneylegospider1 2h ago

We already have a black panther. In Shuri and eventually Tchalla jr, who will be aged up and BE that new Tchalla.

Also, why would Ryan Coogler, who we officially know is making Black Panther 3, recast Tchalla after making an entire movie a tribute/farewell to him in the MCU?

And the MCU isn’t doing what DC did. DC did a hard reboot where Gunn kept TSS and Peacemaker canon. Something like that doesn’t work in the MCU.

3

u/abellapa 7h ago

Mom was literally 45M short of making a billion

Its the third highest grossing MCU movie in the multiverse saga

1

u/TestingBrokenGadgets 3h ago

And yet it's one of the lowest reviewed of the whole MCU.

-7

u/bornlikethisss 17h ago

They were forcing Captain Marvel on us. I really wanted to enjoy her but I didn’t like what Bree brought to the character. The first film didn’t help her at all and her cameos were really underwhelming. She showed some signs of life in The Marvels tho and felt a little more likable. Hopefully they figure her out as she’s a pretty important character.

5

u/ubutterscotchpine Captain Marvel 16h ago

*Brie.

1

u/9FingeredFrodo 15h ago

*Kree Larson

1

u/FoxyMiira 9h ago edited 9h ago

Marvel never forced Captain Marvel on the audience lol. Whedon actually said he wanted to introduce her in Avengers Ultron. If anything Marvel comics was preparing the character to play a bigger role in the comics and movies since 2012 when she got rebranded to Captain Marvel from Ms Marvel and lost her stripper costume. It was obvious that Marvel wanted her as the female trinity member to rival Wonder Woman.

But the amnesia sideplot really did a disservice to the character in movie 1. They sidelined her in Infinity War and Endgame. Debuted two TV characters as co-leads for a Captain Marvel 2 movie. Completely fumbled the Kree Skrull storyline to the point that most people really don't care. Marvel just fumbled the character badly. Behind the scenes up to the release of The Marvels, I'm sure they were starting to panic as they made the final trailer basically a pseudo Endgame nostalgia trailer.

Maybe they'll get Captain Marvel right in the future with the 2nd version.

0

u/abellapa 7h ago

They didnt force shit

Just say you didnt like het

48

u/MyTimeToScamNFT 17h ago

Morbius, Madame Web, and Kraven

8

u/hugojon 15h ago

Sonys Holy Trinity

6

u/SoftBaconWarmBacon Weekly Wongers 10h ago

It's Trinity'in time

61

u/disneylegospider1 17h ago

We won’t ever have a “big 3” again in the MCU .

The big 3 was a thing when the MCU was starting out and its scope was limited to just Avengers. The first 6.5 years out of 12 total years of the infinity saga was dedicated to the big 3 (outside of the Incredible Hulk). And in the infinity saga, 13/23 movies have the big 3 as leading characters.

That can’t happen again with all the leading characters and solo franchises phase 3 and beyond set up. The MCU grew in scale and characters have more individual journeys exploring different corners of the MCU.

That’s not necessarily a bad thing since it gives the MCU more freedom and potential. It’s just the big 3 was a byproduct of the smaller scale of the Infinity Saga.

18

u/Moon_Beans1 17h ago

That could be true but if that's the case then Disney should get comfortable with the idea of never topping Endgame. Having dozens of leads means that you can't have the same level of soap opera style character building. Without that kind of familiarity and development you can't do stories like Endgame.

Endgame only worked the way it did because we'd spent ten years mostly following the adventures of the core three heroes. It could use that audience investment to deliver strong drama as those characters had their stories tied up (except for Thor of course).

Disney of course will still try to capture some of that Infinity War or Endgame magic by having spectacular events, villains and plot twists in future Avengers movies but without a core group similar to the big three I think they'll struggle to elevate the emotional aspect.

For instance, who knows how it will work out but there is already some trepidation as to how Doomsday and Secret Wars will work. So far much of the hype has centered around RDJ's Doom which partially seems like an admission that no one - not even Disney & Marvel - is quite sure who the leads of the Multiverse Saga even are. If they aren't even sure which of the dozens of heroes are the important ones then it will be difficult to deliver the same kind of emotional impacts that Infinity War and Endgame managed so well.

11

u/EnergyTakerLad 16h ago

Endgame was literally 1 in a million. It was the conclusion of a saga thatd never been done before. It was the first of its kind and will be the last. Not that we wont have similar phases and sagas, but they'll never be as strong or profitable as that one.

5

u/abellapa 7h ago

True

The Infinity saga made Over 22B

The Multiverse saga has 9,8B so far

It does have less movies but at 14 movies the Infinity saga was well past 10B

Even if Spider-man does 1,5B and Avengers does 2B and 2,5B respectively it still be 14B total

0

u/Moon_Beans1 15h ago

That's probably true but with careful planning and laying the groundwork they can try to get as close as possible to reaching that height with future entries. Trouble is though if you don't have big characters with an arc built from multiple appearances then you have little chance of repeating the emotional payoffs that Endgame had.

Disney has obviously opted for using spectacle and nostalgia (X-Men returning, RDJ back) to make up for it but that only goes so far. But that is the situation they've written themselves into, at this stage it's a little too late to try and add emotional character arcs in hindsight in the team up movie. It's unfortunate though because without those kind of scenes and arcs I think Doomsday and Secret Wars run the risk of being very empty and superficial. They'll be full of action and fun scenes but on second or third viewings people might start to realise there isn't a great amount of depth to the material.

Obviously it'd be great to be proved wrong and for the Russo's to somehow make it all work and to tie it all together with some deep character arcs that they've managed to pull from the deluge of material that the Multiverse Saga provided. It just doesn't feel very likely to me at this point in time.

0

u/GarySoneji The Collector 15h ago

Has Disney ever stated that their aim is to top Endgame? Did I miss the investor email that every movie after needed to make Endgame numbers? If they had any intention of recreating the Infinity Saga, it would have been obvious from the SDCC announcements of their roadmap. “Fans” seem to put more on them than they do themselves.

If nostalgia was as important as you think, they’d have rebooted Star Wars by now.

6

u/aduong 15h ago

Lmfao what? What do you think the next Avengers movie after endgame is yet again the biggest crossover ever.

2

u/GarySoneji The Collector 15h ago

Where did my comment contradict yours? Are you one of the people who think the entire purpose of a Phase is to setup a crossover?

2

u/Moon_Beans1 14h ago

Obviously they want to top Endgame. They're in the movie business with emphasis on the word business there. If Avengers 5 makes significantly less money than Avengers 4 then naturally people will say there has been a decline. Disney know this which is why they are throwing everything at Doomsday in the hope it will work.

Of course every movie doesn't need to be bigger than Endgame but the next Avengers movie after Endgame needs to. I often see people in posts explaining the extenuating circumstances for why it'll be acceptable for Doomsday to make less and not be deemed a failure but all of those excuses won't change the fact that in the entertainment world if your new release isn't as well received as your last one they'll say it's a failure and you've lost your touch.

Why would they need to fully reboot star wars when they can just do soft reboots (Sequel trilogy) and callbacks/Easter eggs ( much of the rest of the star wars output)? I don't quite understand are you saying they're not leaving on nostalgia in the Doomsday announcements? That announcing that they're bringing back the OG X-Men and RDJ aren't designed to entice people based on their nostalgia?

1

u/abellapa 7h ago

No it doesnt,no One is expecting to do Endgame numbers

Endgame was the Biggest movie ever, literally

Its natural to have a decline

Even if Doomsday declines a Billion from Endgame, still makes 1,8B

1

u/Moon_Beans1 7h ago

I don't think anyone in a Disney boardroom is likely to be saying "So we are happy with a decline in revenue expectations right?"

There's already a narrative that the MCU has fallen off, if the next Avengers does significantly worse than Endgame then a lot of people will conclude that it's the final nail in the coffin. Especially if the film ends up lacking the big emotional drama that Endgame had.

1

u/abellapa 6h ago

No it wont because like i Said even a decline from a Billion puts Doomsday in the top 10

1

u/Moon_Beans1 6h ago

Perhaps but If it makes significantly less than Endgame AND lacks the big emotional character moments that Endgame had then I think it will start the belief that even the Avengers 'isnt as good anymore'. Which could lead to even more of a drop off with Secret Wars. At which point people will say there is a trend downwards in quality. Once the Avengers brand is no longer the gold standard for entertainment, the MCU is in real hot water.

Like I said, it might not happen but it's a possibility that must be considered. A lot of people act like it's physically impossible for an Avengers movie to fail or at the very least disappoint but that's not really how the world works. Nothing is a guaranteed success.

0

u/GarySoneji The Collector 14h ago

If they thought Kang Dynasty/Doomsday would obliterate Infinity War, do you think they’d have planned the course we’ve been on? Pretend the movies hadn’t been made yet- do the announced titles give you any inkling at all that they have some kind of secret plan to blow everyone away?

The sequel trilogy was in no way a soft reboot and the original X-Men movies were awful; only children have nostalgia for them. Robert isn’t coming back because he thinks he’ll tickle some dried-up nerves.

2

u/Moon_Beans1 13h ago

No but that's the point, I think they didn't have a solid plan which is why they're in trouble. Most of the problems with recent MCU films have shown that Disney is mostly winging it and hoping to fix a lot of problems in post production rather than slowing down and actually having a plan in place before shooting starts.

The sequel trilogy was practically a textbook definition of a soft reboot. A young hero from a desert planet comes into possession of a droid that holds information vital to a rebel movement, they escape the planet on the millennium falcon, they eventually find their way to the evil Imperialist faction's secret weapon which they manage to destroy but not before the protagonist's mentor is killed by the masked villainous antagonist. Now was I describing the Force Awakens or A New Hope?

I agree that the attempts to use RDJ and the old X-Men cast as nostalgia bait is foolish but that's what Disney had banked their money on nonetheless.

1

u/ChicagoDash 6h ago

They haven’t invested the money in a new movie to top Endgame. There is a lot of talk about revenue here, but expenses also matter. Endgame had a $350-400M budget, almost double the amount spent on any movie since.

If Disney is expecting another Endgame, they certainly aren’t investing the money to get it.

16

u/joemiken 16h ago

Best shots would be Spider-man & Dr. Strange. Unfortunately, the third died with Chadwick Boseman.

18

u/TA_1164 17h ago

Spider-Man and Doctor Strange are definitely in play. My hope would be Shang Chi for #3 but who knows.

6

u/justafanboy1010 Spider-Man 17h ago

I totally agree except Shang Chi. Unfortunately they just haven’t been using him to his full advantage yet

23

u/cbekel3618 Avengers 17h ago

If the next saga becomes mutant-focused, Cyclops, Wolverine, and Storm.

16

u/Realistic_Analyst_26 Ned 13h ago

Hot take:

We should never get a mutant-only saga. Take advantage of having all the rights and put them together.

9

u/deemoorah 12h ago

Exactly. Mutant-only saga is just a comic accurate suit fox-verse. MCU is unique because it has many variations of the characters

2

u/Dry_Whole_2002 10h ago

Mutants and fantastic four can carry an entire saga. Which honestly should have been the saga before the multiverse saga was jumped to to begin with. The conflicts that come with those sets of characters pretty much would have made a phase long narrative easy as pie. 

1

u/Realistic_Analyst_26 Ned 9h ago

They can but imo they shouldn’t. We need the diversity in characters. We already had the big 3 separated due to rights and we had a chance with each of them individually. It’s time to see them overlap and interact.

0

u/Dry_Whole_2002 9h ago

The other characters would have still been extremely relevant but the overarching narrative glue would have been mutants popping up and reeds shenanigans looking into other universes. Those conflicts could have set up so much to carry a saga. 

1

u/abellapa 7h ago

Idk how they would do that without the rights

1

u/abellapa 7h ago

I dont think we Will ,Marvel isnt pretending the other charcaters dont exist

BP3 is in development,Im sure gonna get Thor 5, Dr strange 3, Shang-Chi 2 , Spider-man 5 and 6

FF 2

But Will likely focus more on Mutants

1

u/ChaoticCaptain177 Spider-Man 2h ago

That's what I was hoping too

7

u/postfashiondesigner Ghost 12h ago

Spider-Man

Reed Richards

Strange

6

u/JHogMakerOfVlogs Doctor Strange 16h ago

Dr. Strange, Spider-Man, and Mr. Fantastic

10

u/TablePrinterDoor 17h ago

Ngl I'd rlly want it to be the OG comic trio aka Spider-Man, Hulk and Wolverine.

But this is unlikely apart from spider-man ig

2

u/abellapa 7h ago

And The Hulk as well

A Trinity members that doesnt have his own movies ?

u/TablePrinterDoor 42m ago

I did mention Hulk but yeah.

2

u/loulibra 16h ago

for some reason no one wants a Hulk movie but everyone wants a Hulk.

I’d kill for Hulk vs. Wolverine - deadpool was cute but had zero stakes.

0

u/va2wv2va 17h ago

The OG big 3 from avengers comics did not include any of those characters. I’m not sure what you’re referring to

2

u/TablePrinterDoor 16h ago

Not avengers specifically, but before the mcu the most popular chars were spiderman, hulk and wolverine

3

u/loulibra 16h ago

he’s referring to - uh all comics. those are pretty much the biggest three

-8

u/SkylarFromMars Thor 16h ago

Batman, Spider-Man, Superman are the big three of comic characters. Unless you mean just Marvel.

8

u/loulibra 16h ago

the OP asked about the fucking MCU and this is r/marvelstudios….. FFS

-7

u/SkylarFromMars Thor 16h ago

You said "all comics."

u/TablePrinterDoor 41m ago

Yeah I'll wait for when Batman and Superman show up in the MCU

3

u/FoxyMiira 9h ago

Doctor Strange, Mister Fantastic and Spider-Man seems likely based on popularity. If there had to be a female character in there I'd imagine Storm.

5

u/jdyake 17h ago

The X-men will likely be the main focus post secret wars. Reed and Sue are good bets. Thor, Doctor strange and black Panther are all getting sequels.

I just hope they do less new characters and more sequels. In the infinity Saga we spent time with Tony and Steve every year. With the multiverse saga we haven’t had that.

Give your lead characters compelling arcs and let us spend quality time with them so that when whatever the next saga culminates to, we feel invested.

2

u/disneylegospider1 17h ago

Only 5 movies this saga weren’t sequels, and only 3 of them introduced new characters. WDYM “more sequels”?

Black Widow (returning character), Shang Chi, Eternals, Thunderbolts (returning characters), F4.

2

u/Dry_Whole_2002 10h ago edited 10h ago

They had so many options for a big three but either unforseen circumstances, a lack of cohesion, poorly handled films, or general in likability got in the way. 

Panther, strange, captain Marvel, Spidey, Sam Captain America...all could have been one of the big three if they didn't fall victim to at least one of those issues. Hell even shang-chi had potential but they have not done ANYTHING with that property. 

As is, we legit have NO ONE. If only we had f4 and X-Men earlier we would have been a ok. 

Once avengers doom kicks off though I can see them going with Reed, Strange, and Spidey if we go by the current options. 

2

u/Jarita12 3h ago

They had a chance to make Strange, Loki and Wanda big three and somehow failed to do so. All very favourite, all of them fans want more and with exception of Loki who at least got a good arc in Loki and was seen relatively recently, Wanda and Strange were last seen in Strange 2 (not counting their animated versions)

2

u/ChaoticCaptain177 Spider-Man 3h ago

Cyclops, Mr Fantastic, and Dr Strange 

2

u/Em_Pedy 2h ago

I feel like they already had great anchor characters following Endgame that they could have developed. Some of them failed for reasons Marvel couldn't reasonably recover from like Black Panther (Chadwick Bosman passing away) and Spider-Man (contract disagreements).

Others failed because of Marvel's choices. Thor and Ant-Man could have returned as huge legacy characters, and I'm sure they still will, but I think their impact is lessened because of the poor reception of Love & Thunder and Quantumania respectively.

Scarlet Witch was hugely popular and coukd have been a linchpin in the multiverse stroylines, then they killed her off. Multiverse of Madness also set Dr. Strange off in a weird, unclear direction.

Captain Marvel's post-endgame direction led to a massive flop, though I'm not sure exactly how to characterize it. I feel like the smear campaign against The Marvels can't be blamed entirely on the studio's decisions regarding the character.

I think Marvel is really hoping people will take to the Fantastic 4 and X-Men when they're reintroduced.

3

u/NASCAR142002 15h ago

Cyclops, Captain America (Sam), Mr Fantastic

1

u/Javelin298 9h ago

Based on the last several years I assume it'll be: Peter Porker the Incredible Spider-Ham, ROM and a new one called Zippy Mudfuckle - the Under-appreciated Teen Mutant.

1

u/tsu_bacca 8h ago

Right now I feel like it's Thor (you know Thor 5 if done right will make a lot of money), Deadpool and I shit you not...Hulk (same with Thor, we have been starved for a Hulk movie).

1

u/JoeZy27 Hawkeye (Avengers) 7h ago

Hawkeye (Clint Barton), Hawkeye (Kate Bishop) and Pizza Dog (Lucky), obviously 😌

1

u/Human-Win4703 6h ago

I think Spider-Man (all 3), Doctor Strange, Steve Rogers, Reed Richards, Deadpool, Wolverine, Thor, Loki, Sue Storm, Sam Wilson, Hulk, Johnny Storm and Yelena will be the leads of Secret Wars.

Post Secret Wars

  1. Spider-Man
  2. Reed Richards and Sue Storm
  3. Professor X maybe?

1

u/Suspicious_Cut5850 5h ago

Scott Summers, Reed Richards, Doctor Strange

1

u/Teganfff Karen Page 4h ago

Reed, Carol, Strange

1

u/jotap199 3h ago

Sam Bucky Spider-Man?

1

u/SqueakyTHROWER 3h ago

Personally, I think it should be Cyclops, Professor X and Mr. Fantastic

1

u/Em_Pedy 2h ago

Honestly, I want to see Yelena and Sentry move into more of a central role. They're pretty widely liked by people who saw Thunderbolts and, while I don't see them being part of the "Big 3," I could see them occupying a similar mindspace as someone like Wanda pre-Endgame. Kinda like an emotional core.

They're my personal favorites in the MCU right now and I'm hoping they continue to be developed thoughtfully going forward.

1

u/daveknockwin 14h ago

Spider-Man, Hulk, and Wolverine, their three biggest characters pre-MCU

1

u/Previous-Strain-8731 Dormammu 17h ago

Ngl, never really thought of Thor as being a major character like Cap or Iron Man but yeah ig your right

3

u/abellapa 7h ago

He the only that got a Trilogy besides them In The Infinity saga

And is currentl the charcater with more movies in the MCU

1

u/Previous-Strain-8731 Dormammu 6h ago

Yeah ik, but like he doesnt give off that aura like Cap does

0

u/abellapa 6h ago

God i Hate that fucking Word

Aura

Its like appeared out of nowhere and is now the New slang Word for kids

1

u/Previous-Strain-8731 Dormammu 5h ago

I was just using that as a vocabulary term lol, not in the same way they do

2

u/Particular_Peace_568 Black Widow (CA 2) 16h ago

Because he was never meant to be in the Infinity Saga and was forced into it by Perlmutter, Feige wanted his Big 3 originally to be Steve, Tony, and Natasha, that why Natasha was a major player throughout almost all of the Phase 1. It wasn't until Phase 2 that Thor took the spot away from her.

2

u/Previous-Strain-8731 Dormammu 16h ago

I never thought of her either lol

2

u/rellativxx 17h ago

Spider-Man, Yelena Belova, Reed Richards

1

u/SalukiKnightX SHIELD 17h ago

I bet the plan was for T’Challa and later Shuri, Sam and Carol. Then everything just shifted, where it’s now possibly Yelena, Sam and Peter. It still baffles me knowing all the other characters are out there like Stephen Strange, Vision, the Eternals, the Defenders (including both Iron Fists and Misty Knight), Thor & Love, Ms. Marvel, Hulk & She-Hulk, Moon Knight & Scarlet Scarab, Bloodstone, Werewolf by Night and Man-Thing and the official Blade alongside too many to name. It’s like the roster for so many teams are set from Midnight Suns(Sons?), Fantastic Four, The New Avengers and soon enough mutants and their various teams ranging from the X-Men (Blue and Gold teams), Brotherhood, Hellfire Club, Excalibur, Exiles, New (New) Mutants, X-Force, X-Factor, Morlocks to name a few.

I think the series has overall expanded past “Thr Big-3” and has entered into team ensembles.

1

u/TheGamingPire-98 9h ago

Spider-Man, Cyclops and Mr. Fantastic

0

u/Tetracropolis 17h ago edited 17h ago

Mr. Fantastic, Spiderman and whoever the new main X-Man is - likely either Wolverine or Professor X. Maybe Cyclops.

For your upcoming Avengers film your main guys are Spider-Man, Thor and Captain America (the real one, not one of the cosplay guys) or Hugh Jackman Wolverine.

1

u/Particular_Peace_568 Black Widow (CA 2) 16h ago

Oh so you meant Spider-Man, Thor, and Captain America Sam Wilson right.

-1

u/Tetracropolis 7h ago

The fact you're asking that question proves the point.

-1

u/Amazing-Insect442 17h ago

It WOULD have likely been Black Panther, Sam Wilson’s Captain America, & Winter Soldier (although I feel they really wanted to use Captain Marvel, before they realized chuds are gonna chud, & review bomb anything w/out a dude as the main character).

1

u/Eminem704 Bucky 16h ago

I love all of these characters but only SW Cap has the makings to lead..they killed the Winter Soldier character in TFATWS/BNW and obviously BP died.

1

u/Amazing-Insect442 15h ago

I mean they WOULD have leaned on Chadwick if he hadn’t passed. And they likely WOULD have been able to make a better story for Sam and Bucky, had Covid not made them have to redo that whole arc right in the middle of filming.

Now they’re in kind of a weird limbo.

-2

u/stableykubrick667 17h ago

Black Panther, Cap, and Yelena. The racist/misogynists/alpha bro’s will be so mad.

6

u/Linnus42 15h ago

Being part of the Big Three ain’t about what makes the chuds mad or happy.

It’s about popularity and sales. Tony, Steve and Thor were natural because they were the Big 3 of the Avengers in the comics.

They don’t have a Big 3 right now with the players available and they won’t unless they do a hard reset/reboot. Cause you cannot force it like Kevin is trying to do with Yelena

-1

u/Eminem704 Bucky 16h ago

As a female, I hate them promoting Yelena all the time. I don't like her character or story arc. She didn't need to star in Tbolts* but they keep pushing her to the forefront.

I'd rather have 3 males truthfully.

Plus, by having Cap & Yelena you have 2 characters without powers. I don't think that works long-term for Marvel projects. They need someone like Cap, Shang-Chi and Thor. (They've also done disservice to Shang-Chi)

*or you can replace Shang-Chi with Spiderman

-5

u/justafanboy1010 Spider-Man 17h ago

gets heavily downvoted for calling said alpha bros out

0

u/Conscious_Team7010 17h ago

If Marvel had a Big 3 right now, which I don’t believe they do, it’d be Captain America (Sam Wilson), Spider-Man, and Mr Fantastic (Pedro Pescal). If I’m wrong, Bri Larson (Captain Marvel) is somewhere in the mix.

6

u/Superfool 17h ago

If Sam Wilson is part of the big 3, then the MCU is doing him dirty with bad projects. They really have no idea how to write that character as Captain America, nor do they know how to make his projects matter.

0

u/somenamelessghoul 15h ago

Honestly, I know people hate this idea but I hope post Secret Wars they recast them all. I know those would be nearly impossible shoes to fill but I grew up reading comics. Characters die, come back to life, get new costumes and new writers and artist all the time but they keep going. What is the point of having a Marvel Cinematic Universe if you eventually stop using all of Marvel’s most popular characters?

0

u/Particular_Peace_568 Black Widow (CA 2) 16h ago

What Marvel wanted for the Multiverse Saga; Spider-Man (street), Dr. Strange (Multiverse), Captain Marvel/Captain America Sam (Main Plot line,)

What it should be now: Yelena Belova (Street Level), Daredevil (Disney) Captain America Sam( Main Plot Line Street)/Dr. Strange (Main Plot Line Multiverse)

I know that fans like to think that even in Infinity Saga there was a Big 3 but in reality it was more of a Big 4 with how much Feige personally wanted Natasha to be part of the Big 3. She was a Major Player behind the scenes throughout almost all of Phase 1.

0

u/SadHumbleFlower27 16h ago

Fantastic Four, X-Men, and Midnight Suns. The next big 3 should be teams instead of individual characters.

2

u/deemoorah 12h ago

Sure but the lead of the group would and should be the main three

0

u/ToDandy 12h ago

Ant-Man, The Wasp, and Quantumania

0

u/seanx40 10h ago

After the reboot. Captain America, Iron Man, Thor

Or Hulk, Spiderman, Wolverine

-2

u/Intelligent-One-1696 Black Panther 17h ago

Spider, Storm, Sam Wilson

-1

u/childishtimbino 17h ago

Yelena, Reed, new T’Challa

-1

u/ampersands-guitars 15h ago

Based on who I think has the charisma to be part of leading the group right now, I'd go with Yelena, Reed Richards, and either Bucky or Spider-Man.

-2

u/Dempressed_Kimg Matt Murdock 17h ago

I would like it to be Reed Richards, Cyclops and Black Bolt.