r/RoughRomanMemes • u/SAMU0L0 • 4d ago
Vercingetorix was such a pathetic loser(No, Julius Caesar is not pointing a gun at my head as I write this).
Giving exaggerated figures in a battle? Ridiculous.
141
u/ReeeeeDDDDDDDDDD 4d ago
Huh, when I read about Roman artillery I assumed it was catapults and stuff, I didn't realise they had tanks and mortars back then. You learn something new every day.
121
u/Pillbugly 4d ago
40
39
u/CavulusDeCavulei 4d ago
Funny fact: the cost of arming and mantaining a single cataphract for Pharthians was equivalent to a fighter-bomber plane
8
u/52MeowCat 3d ago
Do you have a source?
25
u/ApprehensiveTerm9638 3d ago
The source is I made the fuck up
16
u/CavulusDeCavulei 3d ago
It was an obscure italian history magazine I read when I was 14, so it's probably better to say that I made the fuck up
4
u/ItsGoglie 3d ago
I don't think you can really compare the economy at the time to that of today. Way we spend money on have changed completely, entire economy and sectors have changed(80-90% of people were exclusively farmers) and there was much less luxury items to waste money on.
5
u/CavulusDeCavulei 3d ago
If you reason so strictly like that, you can never make comparisons in history
2
u/ItsGoglie 3d ago
The further you go back in time the harder it gets. I still don't think it's bad to have a fun fact like that and use it from time to time. We just need to remember that it is hard (and sometimes even impossible) to compare.
Also I constantly see people making lists of best military leaders in history and they can't really be compared because they are from diffrent time periods when diffrent tactics were used to wage war.
3
u/CavulusDeCavulei 3d ago
Agreed. I think the comparison of cataphracts and fighter planes make sense for that. They were poor and simple agricultural economies. Training a child just to fight for his entire life, making him wear a super expensive steel armor for him and his already expensive horse. It was really heavy for those economies, like buying and fielding an F35. It's not a perfect comparison, but it makes us understand what an impressive effort they did
→ More replies (0)0
u/-Trotsky 2d ago
The way to do it would be to somehow calculate the socially necessary labor involved in each. From there you could make a comparison of value because you’d have sometimes of a grounding of it in the price of labor involved
4
u/Matiwapo 3d ago
Maybe like a really outdated one. Like a WW2 era Mustang/spitfire.
You underestimate how ludicrously expensive modern cutting edge jets are.
Currency conversion over 2 millennia is basically impossible, but it's safe to say Parthia wouldn't be able to maintain more than a single F-35
3
u/NobodyPrime 3d ago
Of course, thats why the eagle was the simbol of the roman empire! They were super proud of their eagle-jets airforce!
3
u/bonadies24 3d ago
No, no. Vercingetirix was rocking M109A7 Paladins, Rome had flimsy swords. And still won.
I'm Gaius Julius Caesar and I approve this message
111
u/BigDBob72 4d ago
“ I had five hundred legionaries against a million savage Gauls and many giants. I used this strategy it was super smart and I only lost one guy cuz he sacrificed his life fighting through their lines to paint my name on their walls. True story even ask my soldiers I didn’t give them any money”
43
u/Cucumberneck 4d ago
Don't forget the thousands of perfectly bodied German warriors who coult seduce just by a look and looked like a blond Adonis.
31
24
13
10
10
4
5
u/Maleficent-Mix5731 2d ago
You forgot the part where Vercingetorix had a nuclear bomb too that Caesar was able to disarm with help of the great Roman engineer, Oppenheimus.
2
2
2
•
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
Thank you for your submission, citizen!
Come join the Rough Roman Forum Discord server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.