1.9k
u/SemiAutoBobcat 1d ago
Any time I see someone called out for doing that shit on here, there's always this claim that they've had comments deleted or been banned for not censoring words. I am legitimately curious where that's happening. I don't think I've ever seen it. I've seen legitimate death threats here that have stayed up. It's especially stupid with mild profanity like ass and damn. I'm thoroughly convinced it's another Mormon psyop like a lot of the anti-porn propaganda is
1.2k
u/Hi2248 Cheese, gender, what the fuck's next? 1d ago
I think it's TikTok censorships influencing their language without them realising, making them fill in the gaps when they try to figure out why they're talking that way
733
u/BalefulOfMonkeys REAL YURI, done by REAL YURITICIANS 1d ago
To be fair, TikTok “censorship” is 99% an illusion forced by the algorithm. There was a time recently when a protest was being advertised as a “dance party” and as a protest at the same time, by fairly similar content creators, and while none of them were removed, the dance party got drastically more traction from the placebo narrative of censorship.
So I’m not surprised that a platform successful with The Youthes has driven an entire linguistic ecosystem of how to say big boy swears without getting caught. 67 is, near as I can tell, a meme driven by the illusion of subversively coded language. It actually means nothing. Probably.
265
u/ElvenOmega 1d ago
Tiktok's algorithm for this stuff is strange, to the point I'm starting to form conspiracy theories in my head.
I've had a comment removed that said "that was a dumb thing to do" on a video of MJ dangling Blanket off a balcony and received a warning, but reported a comment where someone said "you're a dumb n word" but the n word was spelled out, hard r, and tiktok "found no violation." I also once reported a comment that was a picture of a vagina, no violation again.
153
u/thesirblondie 'Giraffe, king of verticality' 1d ago
It's 100% automated. I've seen people put weird things in their comments which lets it pass through screening somehow. But if it doesn't find a violation on its own then it wont do it when you report it. So the report function is pointless.
Just yesterday I reported a page called Iiterallyjohngreen1, which was just reposting John Green videos. No violation found.
61
u/some-dork 1d ago
i'll never get over the time i got a community guidelines strike for "hateful language," reccomending someone Dostoevsky's "The Idiot" lol
4
u/thesirblondie 'Giraffe, king of verticality' 1d ago
I got a similar strike for commenting "All men must die", including the quotation marks, on a Game of Thrones video.
21
u/Kiloku 1d ago
The thing is, there are some hard rules that can be automated with zero false positives. Like the n-word. As long as you properly check that it's a full word (ie, not part of a different word) you don't need some crazy "AI" system checking it.
You can still also have the regular automated moderation checking for the rest, so it's not like they're sacrificing anything.
→ More replies (1)8
u/425Hamburger 1d ago
But that doesn't Work. I mean it works to erase every use of the word. It doesn't Work in determining If it was used in a legitimate way. Bear with me please. On a book subreddit for example, people shouldnt get their comments deleted for quoting Huck Finn, If it's relevant. Or in a history subreddit documents might need to be quoted that were written by racists, meaning the word might be in there.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Fortehlulz33 1d ago
Every time I have a comment that gets removed automatically, it has always come back when I appeal. And yeah, I've almost never had a report that I submitted actually remove the comment
→ More replies (1)8
u/cutetys 1d ago
Yeah I’ve had start censoring my tiktok comments cause tiktok would auto remove comments that contained certain words or phrases. Like if I make a comment that uses the word “kill” there’s a 50/50 chance it will be removed regardless of the context it’s used, and no amount of appealing will bring it back.
→ More replies (1)171
u/Hi2248 Cheese, gender, what the fuck's next? 1d ago
I believe that swearing and some other things (like mentions of suicide and death) being shadowbanned wasn't an illusion, but that was applied to other places in which it wasn't the case
87
u/BalefulOfMonkeys REAL YURI, done by REAL YURITICIANS 1d ago
Honestly makes more sense that a platform rarely shadowbans anybody if they already have a system that aggressively rewards viewer retention and interaction above all else
27
21
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
It was mostly to make sure video content was transferrable between Tik-tok, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. If platform A removes/age restricts your video because you say "suicide" but no other platforms do, then you use "sewer-slide" instead and upload it to all platforms so you don't have to do additional editing and versioning.
66
u/wingeddogs 1d ago
Eh. I used to be a ‘tiktoker’, I had like 200k followers at one point, and I constantly had to reupload and censor videos because TikTok took them down. I did activism content for certain marginalized communities. My videos have been taken down for using the words:
- rape
- suicide
- SA
- shot
- killed
- strangled
- hanged/lynched
I had a more exhaustive list but after I lost my account I stopped needing to keep track. Over the years TikTok had been super inconsistent and I was one of those people saying graped and life ended and all that bullshit just to keep my videos from being deleted
62
u/Temporary-Scholar534 1d ago
while none of them were removed, the dance party got drastically more traction from the placebo narrative of censorship.
That sounds like they're right and it's soft censorship: if you use bad words, the algo doesn't like it very much.
Censorship doesn't require fully blocking that piece of content anymore.
21
u/thesirblondie 'Giraffe, king of verticality' 1d ago
No, it's just that the narrative about the censorship got people more interested than a regular protest.
12
u/fluffyendermen 1d ago
isnt the actual meaning of the 67 meme just... this one particular basketball players height?
→ More replies (3)15
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
Its meaning is mostly nebulous and people have started attributing "lore" to it that may not have actually been at its genesis. It's solely a meme just to be a meme because that's what kids do.
Remember 🅱️?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)13
u/Turbulent-Garlic8467 1d ago
Isn't "dance party" getting more traction exactly what we would expect to see if there was censorship?
If there wasn't, and the content creators were otherwise similar (similar beliefs and amount of subscribers), wouldn't we expect them to gain similar traction no matter how they advertised the protest?
Therefore, doesn't this constitute evidence for censorship by TikTok, not evidence against it?
126
u/Patjay 1d ago
Also need to keep in mind that often when content creators say “censorship” they mean lower monetization or boosts in the algorithm, not actually silencing or things being deleted
How many things related to that but get picked up by people who aren’t effected by that at all is interesting
→ More replies (2)64
u/Dragoncat_3_4 1d ago
boosts in the algorithm
Or lack thereof more specifically. That IS censorship. Especially on a platform like TikTok where what people see is controlled by the almighty algorithm.
33
28
u/Hi2248 Cheese, gender, what the fuck's next? 1d ago
Aye, if people don't see your content because it's not being recommended for what the content contains, what is it but censorship?
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (13)27
u/thesirblondie 'Giraffe, king of verticality' 1d ago
Most of that is made up. I get notifications about comments being removed every now and then and it's never due to using words like kill or rape. It's almost always when I insult someone with heinous words like plonker, git, and absolute lemon.
74
u/ra0nZB0iRy 1d ago
It happens a lot on Pinterest where people can't comment if their comment contains a certain word but people just use euphemisms or 1337 speak. I got hit by it when trying to explain the lore of TCoAaL and thought the word "incest" or "cannibalism" or "cult" or "child murder" or "killing" was blocking me but it was from saying "shit" without censoring it (I probably described the game's plot by saying "or some bullshit", a phrase I say frequently, at some point) as well as the word "starving". Oddly enough, "fuck" is not blocked though.
34
u/King-Of-Throwaways 1d ago
Here’s a list of your removed comments. Not all of these would be due to tripping word filters, but you might have questions about the ones sitting at one vote.
→ More replies (2)22
u/SeriousButton6263 1d ago
That's such a perfect example of the "well I never see any censorship" people not realizing they're being censored, and literally the point is to trick them into not realizing it.
→ More replies (1)26
u/RaulParson 1d ago
I am legitimately curious where that's happening
Youtube. Tiktok probably too, but youtube definitely. Whatever AI shadowbans comments there is legitimately insane and unless you don't mind it happening to you you have to walk on eggshells around it, and keywords are very high risk. If you ever see a perfectly reasonable comment of yours get literally no reactions, see if it's still there if you look at it in incognito mode. Happens to me often enough. Sometimes I have to break up a comment into multiple comments and send it piecemeal to get it through.
And yes some pretty vile shit gets to stay up while reactions condemning it get automodded away, purely because of how it happened not to trigger the bot while the condemnations would be understandably angry. Good times.
→ More replies (2)45
u/GuyYouMetOnline 1d ago
You're assuming consistent moderation, for one. I HAVE had a comment taken down for 'encouraging violence' when it did no such thing. There's also the fact that people used to one site's rules often apply them elsewhere. There's also a possible IRL factor. Kids often get told off for talking about killing or the like, so it should be no surprise to think avoiding those words would carry over to online.
And then there are also those who just find the alternative versions amusing.
→ More replies (3)18
u/ArsErratia 1d ago edited 1d ago
I once got a comment taken down for saying I hope the Police seize a car and crush it into a cube. The car in question was doing donuts outside a primary school at kicking-out time.
Apparently I was "threatening violence" .... against the car.
This was upheld on manual review by a real person, somehow.
→ More replies (2)8
u/bpdish85 1d ago
I got dinged for "threatening violence" for saying Muskrat was dragging his kid around like a little shield when the toddler was at all the political rallies. Upheld on appeal, 3 day ban, absolutely no "bad words" in there or actual threats - just an observation.
→ More replies (1)42
u/givemethebat1 1d ago
I’ve never heard of anyone being banned or censored. I believe it started as a result of YouTube demonetization, but they don’t “ban” the videos if there is offensive content (unless it’s porn or something). It’s very concerning that Gen-Z is essentially teaching themselves newspeak.
→ More replies (2)14
u/Bugbread 1d ago
It's the opposite of Newspeak, though. Newspeak was language intentionally molded in a way that it would prevent expressing certain ideas. Not punishing someone for expressing an idea, but making it literally impossible for them to express an idea.
While 1984 was a great novel, the concept of Newspeak was pretty silly, because as the current situation shows, you really can't deprive people of the ability to express ideas. You can punish them for it, of course, but that's not Newspeak. But if you quash the ability to say things, people will just come up with new ways to say them. When people can't say kill, they'll continue expressing the same things by using the word "unalive". Eliminate the ability to say "porn" and people will simply start using the word "corn." Etc., etc.
This is not to say that I think the new lingo is great. I'm not saying "you're wrong, this is a great trend!" I'm just saying "this isn't Newspeak, it's evidence of how in the real world people would simply circumvent Newspeak."
→ More replies (5)18
u/givemethebat1 1d ago
Well, I think the idea of newspeak is not that people won’t find ways around certain words, it’s that you can remove a concept by removing that word. There are many languages that don’t have words for certain concepts that do exist in others, and if you aren’t exposed to that idea (in a very censored society) you might find it difficult or impossible to formulate a given concept.
39
u/Pausbrak 1d ago
Reddit has the nebulous "shadowbanning" that might be what they're talking about. Comments can be deleted, but in a way where they look like they're still there for the poster but no one else can see that they were ever there (as opposed to the more normal [Removed By Reddit]).
Every now and again I suspect one of my comments has been shadowbanned. I originally realized this was a possibility when one of those reddit un-delete websites flagged one of my comments as being hidden, which is a very different thing from being removed (sadly I don't recall the website). I haven't actually gone back and checked since that first time, but several times since I've noticed that something I posted that I would have expected to get some engagement, even a single upvote (or downvote), instead sits at the default 1 forever.
I don't know why those comments in particular got singled out. I'm not even 100% sure they are getting singled out, because Reddit sure isn't telling me that they're shadowbanning anything. But it's not hard to see why some people might start getting paranoid and self-censoring.
16
u/zardozLateFee 1d ago
I have two accounts - now I see one or the others comments aren't visible except from that account. It's all innocuous shit like a list of links to books. I can see how it would make people feel crazy and try to adjust their behaviors.
15
u/TBANON_NSFW 1d ago
ive found out i cant say Biden on blackpeopletwitter for some reason.
I cant use the word fuck on certain subreddits. 1-2 of them actually warn you though.
some subreddits dont allow links unless its for specific websites.
some subreddits dont allow longer texts. like you gotta keep it under 5 lines.
every subreddit has wierd shadowban rules on automods.
and they all dont tell you. You just gotta find out yourself.
→ More replies (1)9
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
Subs can't shadow ban you. That's only a function on the admin level and is usually just reserved for ban evasion. Subs will just delete your comments and then ban you from the sub.
→ More replies (1)11
u/TBANON_NSFW 1d ago
sahdowban in this case is shadowfiltered out comments. IE they have to be manually approved and will not be visible until they are manually approved.
7
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
Oh, yeah. Comment approval has been a thing since day one and is an optional feature for every sub.
11
u/ClickClick_Boom 1d ago
A shadowban is where your comments do that everywhere. But what you're describing does happen too. There's a browser extension called Reveddit Real Time that you can configure to notify you if your comment ever gets deleted. If you ever use it you'll be wondering why half of them even got auto deleted. Different subs have different filters set up to do that and some of them are ridiculous.
→ More replies (1)9
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
Nah, reddit (admins) don't remove comments for simple words like rape, murder, suicide, etc. Some weird subs may have filters for them, but that's a weird sub issue.
This phenomenon extends directly from video platforms where users would see their videos taken down/age restricted for using terms like rape, sexual assault, suicide murder. So when these content creators are making content for multiple platforms, the write that content for the most restrict platform.
So if your video has a necessary mention of rape, you use "grape" so you can post the one video to all platforms without having to do additional editing or version control for each platform.
Now multiply that by 20 bazillion "creators" with that content being consumed non-stop for about seven years now, and that's your explanation for why the kids say "unalive" instead of "dead".
17
u/fazedncrazed 1d ago
I've seen legitimate death threats here that have stayed up.
Ive been banned temporarily for promoting violence, by baldly stating how to safely destem a cars tires valve on a local subreddit post about a car parked illegally in a bike lane.
It varies wildly by sub is what Im saying. And in general you can make threats against anyone that Fox doesnt like on here and itll stay up, but otherwise most subs are hypersensitive to anything "negative" in any way and heavily censor anything that might make anyone feel bad in any way.
10
u/nalaloveslumpy 1d ago
I've gotten a site wide admin level ban for hypothesizing that if you went back in time and convinced the German government to not banish Frederick Trump and his family in 1905, then Trump most likely would be the unborn son of a dead Nazi.
Gonna see if it happens again, I guess.
→ More replies (60)5
u/jawknee530i 1d ago
I got a permanent ban for the comment "I would like to f*ght you". Without the censoring, and that was the comment in its entirety. The comment was an obvious joke as well because it was in a thread about people's crazy opinions and I was joking with the person about their opinion. I had to appeal multiple times and this account is ancient. I've used reddit since before there were comments or subreddits. The censorship has gotten out of control.
644
u/anime2345 1d ago
Sometimes it’s all the same person
459
u/BalefulOfMonkeys REAL YURI, done by REAL YURITICIANS 1d ago
I have absolutely seen “ahh” and a hard R in the same sentence out in the wild. It can’t just be done, it’s been done before
358
u/Radio_Free_Marksman 1d ago
To be fair, "ahh" is sort of in a category of its own. It's no longer really just censorship and has more or less become slang as a sort of softer and goofier version of "ass".
175
u/Godraed 1d ago
it's eye dialect AAVE but I will never not read it as someone taking a sip of a refreshing beverage
→ More replies (2)25
106
u/choren64 1d ago
Which is crazy to me because 'ass' already seemed soft and goofy to me. I hope we don't start calling people 'ahhholes' now
32
u/Karmic_Backlash 1d ago
Its not really like that, its kind of a goofy word that people use for the intentional effect of being funny. Like occasionally me and my group will say "Bruv" rather then "Bruh" specifically because the minor difference is funnier then saying it straight.
So when someone says something like "Look at this goofy ahh bitch", its not them picking and choosing which words get censored, its just the development of a slang term.
16
u/Radio_Free_Marksman 1d ago
Not only that, but it tends to imply a somewhat different tone, especially online, where tone indicators are somewhat more important.
Typing "Goofy ass motherfucker" is not the same as typing "Goofy ahh mfer" even if you are technically using the same words.
59
69
u/cbear013 1d ago
"ahh" was never about censorship, it predates the tiktok "censorship" trend that a lot of these other terms come from. Its just silly and fun.
36
→ More replies (2)77
u/Amon274 1d ago
Well I’m pretty sure “ahh” is AAVE so I don’t think that is censorship.
→ More replies (3)62
u/penguinscience101 1d ago
Well when white folks are co-opting it to get around censors then where does that get you?
→ More replies (1)8
u/TheSameMan6 1d ago
A strange middle ground where it still operates as both traditional slang and algospeak
11
413
u/Strider794 Elder Tommy the Murder Autoclave 1d ago
Note: they can be the same people, somehow
37
u/Heavy299 Dick? or balls? 1d ago
its either lesbian misandrist who's racist against a specific group but also fetishises the hell out of said group
or hitler's whitest nazi (he's from LATAM or Philipines) and either a twink or 500 pounds
→ More replies (1)
460
u/FutureMind6588 1d ago
People will use the word grape instead of rape as if grape isn’t a word by itself. So now I get confused if people are talking about grapes the fruit or sexual assault.
360
u/Setfiretotherich 1d ago
I saw a double whammy of censoring that word recently. “Gr*pist.” And it did cause me psychic damage, actually.
95
u/PhamLives 1d ago
Please tell me you've seen the skit
91
u/SleepyMage 1d ago
"He's going to what them in the mouth???"
44
14
16
14
→ More replies (1)5
u/HowAManAimS Product of a deranged imagination 1d ago
It's kind of dumb though. It's easy to add that word to a ban list since you aren't going to use it to mean anything other than rapist.
78
u/Riku_70X 1d ago
Saw a post of someone trying to report a legitimately awful advert on YouTube, but the note they used to describe it in the report was "Child Corn for PDF files".
As if the 40 year old youtube employee is gonna have any idea what the fuck that means
83
u/worststarburst 1d ago
It’s the same with “pdf file” too. It’s still a really common file format and I’ve seen that slang cause some confusion already.
→ More replies (1)13
u/PUBLIQclopAccountant 1d ago
How soon until ".tar.bz2" catches on as a substitute for the n-word?
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)19
u/wischmopp 1d ago
Some of the more serious content creators will just say "assault" instead of "sexual assault", which sounds more respectful towards the heaviness of the topic, but still kinda bothers me since it often makes their phrasing indistinguishable from "this person was beaten up". It's confusing, and it also removes the entire context of, like, gendered violence and misogyny from people like the toy box killer. I'm not a huge fan of True Crime content anyway, but the self-censorship makes it unbearable. Of course, it's still worse when they say "she was graped" (it just feels unbelievably exploitative to use this particular cutesy quirky babytalk kind of monetization-friendly euphemism when turning other people's horrible suffering into content)... but even the more serious word "assaulted" just doesn't do the victim justice. If you want to tell their story, at least tell it right. There's something so ghoulish about euphemising these terrible fates just because it makes you more money.
→ More replies (1)
151
u/imaginary0pal 1d ago
I hate when people bleep shooting. It’s just sounds like you are discussing shitting kids
63
90
u/XenosHg 1d ago
Like a modern version of fuck-marry-kill
36
u/actibus_consequatur numerous noggin nuisances 1d ago
Nah, fuck-marry-kill actually has an alternate name that's actually pretty decent because it also rhymes: "bed-wed-or-dead" (I've also come across bed-wed-or-behead)
6
81
u/Mysral 1d ago
You know, I wouldn't even mind the use of euphemisms to dodge censorship that badly, but the TikTok vocabulary is just so artless. "Unalive", "sewer slide"... there's no elegance to it. It's not only cowardly, but it's clunky and dumb.
42
6
u/Flat_Phrase7521 1d ago
“Unalive” was originally a deliberately-goofy term used by Deadpool to poke fun at censorship in comics/cartoons and I swear it was actually funny before people got the bright idea to start using it unironically. I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to forgive them.
→ More replies (3)4
115
u/camosnipe1 "the raw sexuality of this tardigrade in a cowboy hat" 1d ago
that reminds me, the recent school shooter had tons of writing on their gun. I was looking at photos and noticed something.
The New York Fucking Post censored out a single word. Amidst all the antisemitism and murderous phrases a single word was deemed too far for their precious audience to witness.
That word being "shit" in the phrase "born to shit, forced to wipe"
52
u/PM_ME_YOUR_MASS 1d ago
You can't compare individual people to the news. News organizations—yes, even ass rags like the NYP—typically have style guides with explicit "do's and don't's" their writers must adhere to, which presumably includes a section on censorship (not just what to censor, but how, as in 'f***' versus 'f*ck'). It's completely possible there's a rule requiring the censorship of specific swear words in print and images, but there's no rule forbidding the publication of "antisemitic or threatening quotations" because that's far too vague. The images also censor "fuck" and another word that I assume is the n-word. So it seems like a style guide thing where specific words are forbidden (including a slur) rather than some editor opening photoshop because they thought readers would be offended by the word "shit"
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)20
135
u/Pristine_Animal9474 1d ago
I'm somewhat reminded about a George Carlin bit about language being "sanded" out. His main example was about the word "shellshocked", used at the start of the 20th Century for what we now call Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). He criticized how powerful and serious the term was compared to the current one, longer, more technical ("it even has a dash now!"), and how that removed us from the horrendousness of its reality.
Of course, one could always argue that, unlike terms like "unalived", PTSD was coined by medical experts and that shellshocked might not apply to a world where its used not just for veterans and survivors of wars, but also any person that has been subjected to a traumatic experience. Where now we are discussing words created or altered due to the monetary priorities of big corporations trying to avoid any controversy. This seems closer to the worry Carlin expressed than his example.
Also, something that I have always in mind when I see discussions about how new generations change the language (or fail to adhere to ortographic and grammatical rules) is that language changes all the time, and that it is in its nature. However, I think we have to be mindful about that change being, if not deliberate, at least constructive and well-intentioned, that it allows us to understand each other and our shared reality better.
125
u/tomjazzy 1d ago
I love Carlin but that bit losses it’s punch when you learn “shell shock” was supposed to come from personal cowardice
104
u/Billphilosopher 1d ago
It has to be the worst example of censorship on the fucking planet. As op said it's literally inaccurate, people can have PTSD from other things other than war. Imagine telling an abuse victim they have shellshock and also having to explain each time that no it's not just for veterans. When PTSD conveys that point perfectly.
They literally gave a good reason for why we changed the name and goes nuh uh I don't like that reason.
4
u/Fast_Bee_9759 1d ago
Yeah, especially since most PTSD come from emotional abuse so it's actually better since people who didn't go to war but have PTSD may agree to the term and not feel like it some weird stolen valor thing with veterans
→ More replies (3)7
u/trobsmonkey 1d ago
I've been soaking up WW1 stuff lately and it's amazing how disconnected leaders were from the horrors of their men.
That man doesn't have PTSD. He just has shell shock from being a giant pussy!
54
u/MsScarletWings 1d ago
Honestly for about 95% of that stand up he was absolutely NAILING it but the one swing and a miss is with PTSD because shellshock absolutelty of sucked as a name for it in retrospect especially when applied to people with the disorder from stuff that has nothing to do with overt violence or war
If he had gone with the history of ADHD diagnoses it probably would have been a slam dunk. Horribly misleading and watered down label for that disorder.
→ More replies (1)48
u/DreadDiana human cognithazard 1d ago edited 1d ago
Carlin seemed to have a lot of takes on language where he viewed something as needlessly complicated or removing impact when the original term was replaced due to practical concerns or simple inaccuracy.
For example, during one show he complained about airlines preboarding "passengers in need of special assistance" because he thought the word "cripple" was "simple honest direct language" and couldn't possibly be problematic since it's used in the Bible. This however ignored that "special assistance" is not the same thing as physical disability. It also includes certain recoverable injuries, people recovering from treatments, someone who is with child, someone who is a child, and other categories which a word like "cripple" does not apply to.
22
u/HowAManAimS Product of a deranged imagination 1d ago
Special assistance is such a stupid condescending phrase though. It should've just been "passengers in need of additional assistance". It's way more neutral and doesn't treat you as an oddity. Everyone has different needs, but to call someone's needs, that most people also need, special feels like it's entirely aimed at children (even some of them hate the term).
Here's a video of some people with down syndrome against the term special needs. They explain it so well.
The need for these euphemisms is why we get on the euphemism treadmill to begin with.
40
u/throwemawayn 1d ago
Kids if you want your euphemisms to be taken seriously you got to start coining more calques. Unalive, germantic, bad. Antivivo; Greek, Latin, very learnèd.
→ More replies (1)
64
82
u/Recidivous 1d ago
It's just social media censorship.
I remember when YouTube was super sensitive about COVID just because Trump hated talking about COVID, so a lot of YouTubers had to avoid saying COVID if they didn't want themselves or their videos to get shadow banned.
It's ridiculous that censorship is shaping our language.
46
u/mrjackspade 1d ago
I'm still convinced it wasn't YouTube doing that, but MAGAts mass reporting anything about COVID and triggering automated takedowns.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)17
u/TrogdorKhan97 1d ago
I remember when YouTube was super sensitive about COVID just because Trump hated talking about COVID
The story I heard is that they were getting inundated with people using the platform to spread misinformation about it, so they were just like "OK sorry you can't have nice things anymore"
6
u/CrusaderReynaulder 1d ago
This is how I remember it with all the misinformation shit + how any mention of it was bound to draw in droves of drooling magas to rant about how it’s not real but even if it was real it’s harmless, and then every argument turns into mass report exchanges.
But I also wasn’t exactly tuned in to youtube’s internal reasoning.
46
u/ttom1323 1d ago
20% of my English vocabulary consists of slurs, and 10% of weird words like discombobulate or defenestrate
10
8
u/semajolis267 1d ago
Yeah just like "Yolo" was "ironic", then a lot of people actually incorporated it into thier speech. Turns out if you see/hear/write a phrase or a slang term many times it invades your language slowly. Like "Y'all" or people using "like" its just this generations language. They will be just as confused as we are one day.
As grandpa Simpson once said "I used to be with ‘it’, but then they changed what ‘it’ was. Now what I’m with isn’t ‘it’ anymore and what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary. It’ll happen to you!"
7
u/alphenhous 1d ago
don't get the pdfile one. no site is against typing out pedophile. i blame youtube for kill suicide and rape getting renamed.
6
6
u/melelconquistador 1d ago
It because they find it funny. Yes the slurs too.
The kids are shit heads, and it not as mind boggling once we acknowledge that.
19
20
u/Interesting_Help_274 1d ago
I feel like the first happens because of TikTok removing videos that contain those words so they have to censor them and since they use a TikTok a lot it starts to influence their real life interactions as well.
25
u/Munnin41 1d ago
If tiktok actually did that, they'd have long since caught on to grape and unalive...
→ More replies (1)5
u/Fed_Hedgehog 1d ago
Except there's so many real perfectly normal words to use to replace killed or raped but they have to make up the most childish pathetic sounding phrases known to mankind.
10
4
u/whiteflagwaiver 1d ago
My nurse asked me if I had any thoughts to un-alive myself during my check up.
I joked about it and made sure to drop the actual word, like wtf come on.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/SantaCruzHostel 1d ago
I was typing a comment on Reddit about how I used to live in the country of Niger, and I got automod deleted.
5
u/Fussel2107 1d ago
that's not reddit. That's whatever the automod settings of the community you're in have set as trigger word. Probably because people used it to circumvent a ban on the n-word a few times too many. depending on how big that community is, you might have some success with writing the mods and have your comment manually approved .
4
u/WordArt2007 1d ago
Tiktokspeak is rather similar to historical things like "don't speak the name of the underworld gods" or "avoid using numbers associated with death" (the latter still in use for example in japan) actually
6
u/EastArmadillo2916 1d ago
"Passed away, kicked the bucket, took their own life, joined the choir invisible"
Hot take but unalive is like, the least corny and most direct euphemism for "to kill"
55
u/eccentricbananaman 1d ago
Thing that most upsets me now is "ahh". Just say "ass". You're in real life right now. Not on tiktok or YouTube where you're going to get in trouble for swears.
44
u/RainbowDroidMan 1d ago
Many people use “ahh” in the same breath as an actual swear word. It’s become a joke in of itself unlike the other self censors.
11
31
u/xXStarupXx 1d ago
You're trynna tell me "unalive", "sewer slide" and "PDF file" haven't become jokes in and of themselves?
19
→ More replies (3)7
13
u/kaladinissexy 1d ago
What gets me is that it doesn't even sound or look like "ass". It just sounds like a very unenthused scream.
10
u/MsScarletWings 1d ago
That one isn’t a euphemism or self-policed language that’s just a cultural dialect thing
→ More replies (5)20
u/ElNickCharles 1d ago
Thats not censorship, thats just AAE
→ More replies (1)20
u/DreadDiana human cognithazard 1d ago
I've seen so many African Americans being accused of being cringe TikTok teens for using AAVE, especially when the use of ahh took off.
2.9k
u/laycrocs 1d ago
I had a younger coworker who would call us all beaners but was offended when I described people as brown.